[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (2) :93-102    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
远场静水压力作用下深埋隧道双层叠合衬砌合理组合形式及力学变形特性研究
(中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300308)
Research on Reasonable Combination Forms and Mechanical Deformation Characteristics of Double-layer Superimposed Lining in Deep-buried Tunnels under the Action of Far-field Hydrostatic Pressure
(China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308)
Download: PDF (5260KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 针对深埋长大隧道传统复合式衬砌结构在遭遇高水头地下水威胁的问题,研究了双层叠合衬砌方案,该方案采用“结构一分为二、两道防水设防”的设计理念,既能克服大体积混凝土施工的困难,又可以解决二次衬砌结构渗漏水的弊病。文章以青岛地铁1号线过海隧道为工程依托,借助ANSYS有限元计算软件,对双层叠合衬砌的合理组合形式及力学变形特性进行了分析,结果表明:叠合衬砌内力分配与内外层结构刚度比有关,刚度越大则内力越大,当内外层结构刚度比为0.716时,tA=0.95 m和tB=0.85 m为最优叠合衬砌厚度组合;隧道结构各控制截面的风险排序为仰拱>拱脚>拱顶;叠合衬砌在外水压力作用下,内外层衬砌变形是相互协调的,仰拱结构变形对刚度比、外水压力量值均较拱顶、侧墙更为敏感;叠合衬砌组合形式是受结构承载力控制而不是受变形控制;最优叠合衬砌组合在外水压力小于1.2 MPa时,结构安全性同样受承载力控制。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高 鑫 王文娟
关键词:   
Abstract: In regards to the threats to traditional composite lining structure of deep-buried long tunnels caused by groundwater with high water head, this paper studies a double-layer superimposed lining scheme, which adopts the design concept of "dividing the lining structure into two parts and installing two water-proof layers" , to not only overcome the construction difficulties of mass concrete but also address the leakage issue of secondary lining structure. This paper takes the sea-crossing tunnel project of Qingdao metro line 1 as the engineering basis and analyzes the reasonable combination forms and mechanical deformation characteristics of the double-layer superimposed lining through the finite element calculation software ANSYS. The results show that the internal force distribution of the superimposed lining is related to the structural stiffness ratio of the inner and outer lining layers; the greater the stiffness ratio is, the greater the internal force will be, and when the structural stiffness ratio of the inner and outer lining layers is 0.716, the optimal combination of the superimposed lining thickness is tA=0.95 m and tB=0.85 m; the risk ranking of each control section of the tunnel structure is inverted arch > arch foot > vault; under the action of ex? ternal water pressure on the superimposed lining, the deformation of inner and outer lining layers is coordinated with each other, while the deformation of the inverted arch structure is more sensitive to the stiffness ratio and the external water pressure value than that of the vault and sidewalls; the combination form of the superimposed lining is controlled by the structural load-bearing capacity rather than by the deformation; the structural safety of the optimal superimposed lining combination is also controlled by the bearing capacity when the external water pressure is lower than 1.2 MPa.
KeywordsHydrostatic pressure,   Superimposed lining,   Stiffness ratio,   Safety factor,   Deformation pattern     
作者简介: 作者简介:高 鑫(1988-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地铁隧道方面的设计与研究工作,E-mail:352110640@qq.com.
引用本文:   
高 鑫 王文娟 .远场静水压力作用下深埋隧道双层叠合衬砌合理组合形式及力学变形特性研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2021,V58(2): 93-102
GAO Xin WANG Wenjuan .Research on Reasonable Combination Forms and Mechanical Deformation Characteristics of Double-layer Superimposed Lining in Deep-buried Tunnels under the Action of Far-field Hydrostatic Pressure[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(2): 93-102
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2021/V58/I2/93
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 于 介.红粘土与砂岩夹泥岩接触带隧道合理施工工法研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 174-181
[2] 吴建成.长距离复杂航线下沉管管节拖航研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 145-150
[3] 雷升祥 1 王 飞 2 于 介 2 邵生俊 3 梁庆国 4.浅谈黄土隧道未来技术发展[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 1-7
[4] 张俊锋 1 李 强 2 史永跃 2 吴 磊 2.西南某隧道岩溶水发育规律及涌水量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 14-21
[5] 周文俊.天平线关山隧道涌水量预测技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 22-30
[6] 龚秋明 1 王庆欢 1 王杜娟 2 邱海峰 3 吴 帆 1.盾构隧道施工刀盘状态实时监测系统研制[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 41-50
[7] 许学良 1,2 马伟斌 1,2 蔡德钩 1,2 安哲立 1,2 柴金飞 1,2.铁路隧道全生命周期检测监测体系研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 31-40
[8] 黄基富 肖功夷.悬臂掘进机在交通隧道施工中的实践应用与适应性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 51-62
[9] 王春河 1,2 朱福强 3 罗 兴 4 张传奎 1,2 田军令 3 李贺朋 2 郭翼飞 4.隧道改扩建工程施工风险评估研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 63-70
[10] 张自光 1,2 曹广勇 1,2 李建立 3 翟朝娇 1,.上软下硬地层地铁隧道安全覆岩厚度研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 71-77
[11] 文 旭 1 裴向军 1 裴 钻 1 杨海龙 1 陈臻林 1 张以晨 2.长白山景区棚洞结构设计及安全性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 151-157
[12] 吴 波 1,2 彭逸勇 1,2 蒙国往 1,2 濮松权 3.软土地层大断面矩形顶管施工引起切口前方地表隆起分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 86-92
[13] 胡长明 1,2 李 靓 1 梅 源 1,2 袁一力 1 王志宇 1.盾构竖向姿态预测模型参数的全局敏感性分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 127-134
[14] 喻洪平 1 苏培东 2 赵天彪 3 陈德君 1 徐学渊 1 杜宇本 1.西成客专黄家梁隧道原油和有害气体来源及危害研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 182-187
[15] 范燕波 1, 2 陈 丽 3 史江伟 1, 2 丁 楚 1, 2 张 显 1, 2.砂土地层深基坑开挖引起下卧隧道变形机理研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 103-110
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术