[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (2) :93-102    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
远场静水压力作用下深埋隧道双层叠合衬砌合理组合形式及力学变形特性研究
(中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300308)
Research on Reasonable Combination Forms and Mechanical Deformation Characteristics of Double-layer Superimposed Lining in Deep-buried Tunnels under the Action of Far-field Hydrostatic Pressure
(China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308)
Download: PDF (5260KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 针对深埋长大隧道传统复合式衬砌结构在遭遇高水头地下水威胁的问题,研究了双层叠合衬砌方案,该方案采用“结构一分为二、两道防水设防”的设计理念,既能克服大体积混凝土施工的困难,又可以解决二次衬砌结构渗漏水的弊病。文章以青岛地铁1号线过海隧道为工程依托,借助ANSYS有限元计算软件,对双层叠合衬砌的合理组合形式及力学变形特性进行了分析,结果表明:叠合衬砌内力分配与内外层结构刚度比有关,刚度越大则内力越大,当内外层结构刚度比为0.716时,tA=0.95 m和tB=0.85 m为最优叠合衬砌厚度组合;隧道结构各控制截面的风险排序为仰拱>拱脚>拱顶;叠合衬砌在外水压力作用下,内外层衬砌变形是相互协调的,仰拱结构变形对刚度比、外水压力量值均较拱顶、侧墙更为敏感;叠合衬砌组合形式是受结构承载力控制而不是受变形控制;最优叠合衬砌组合在外水压力小于1.2 MPa时,结构安全性同样受承载力控制。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高 鑫 王文娟
关键词:   
Abstract: In regards to the threats to traditional composite lining structure of deep-buried long tunnels caused by groundwater with high water head, this paper studies a double-layer superimposed lining scheme, which adopts the design concept of "dividing the lining structure into two parts and installing two water-proof layers" , to not only overcome the construction difficulties of mass concrete but also address the leakage issue of secondary lining structure. This paper takes the sea-crossing tunnel project of Qingdao metro line 1 as the engineering basis and analyzes the reasonable combination forms and mechanical deformation characteristics of the double-layer superimposed lining through the finite element calculation software ANSYS. The results show that the internal force distribution of the superimposed lining is related to the structural stiffness ratio of the inner and outer lining layers; the greater the stiffness ratio is, the greater the internal force will be, and when the structural stiffness ratio of the inner and outer lining layers is 0.716, the optimal combination of the superimposed lining thickness is tA=0.95 m and tB=0.85 m; the risk ranking of each control section of the tunnel structure is inverted arch > arch foot > vault; under the action of ex? ternal water pressure on the superimposed lining, the deformation of inner and outer lining layers is coordinated with each other, while the deformation of the inverted arch structure is more sensitive to the stiffness ratio and the external water pressure value than that of the vault and sidewalls; the combination form of the superimposed lining is controlled by the structural load-bearing capacity rather than by the deformation; the structural safety of the optimal superimposed lining combination is also controlled by the bearing capacity when the external water pressure is lower than 1.2 MPa.
KeywordsHydrostatic pressure,   Superimposed lining,   Stiffness ratio,   Safety factor,   Deformation pattern     
作者简介: 作者简介:高 鑫(1988-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地铁隧道方面的设计与研究工作,E-mail:352110640@qq.com.
引用本文:   
高 鑫 王文娟 .远场静水压力作用下深埋隧道双层叠合衬砌合理组合形式及力学变形特性研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2021,V58(2): 93-102
GAO Xin WANG Wenjuan .Research on Reasonable Combination Forms and Mechanical Deformation Characteristics of Double-layer Superimposed Lining in Deep-buried Tunnels under the Action of Far-field Hydrostatic Pressure[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(2): 93-102
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2021/V58/I2/93
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术