[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :220-227    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
侧壁涂料对公路隧道光环境与人眼视觉特性影响试验研究
(1.安徽中益新材料科技股份有限公司,滁州 239500;2.南京理工大学 机械工程学院,南京 210094;3.安徽广益科研检测有限责任公司,滁州 239000)
Experimental Study on the Impact of Side Wall Coating on Luminous Environment of Highway Tunnel and Visual Characteristics of Human Eyes
(1. Zhongyi New Material Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 239500; 2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094; 3. Anhui Guangyi Scientific Research Testing Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 239000)
Download: PDF (3634KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 公路隧道照明设计的重点聚焦在隧道内路面亮度的设置,对于隧道侧壁亮度只是简单要求不低于路面亮度的60%即可。作为隧道内光环境的重要组成部分,侧壁对隧道内光环境及路面照明质量的影响一直未引起重视。因此,对隧道侧壁涂刷蓄能发光、白色与灰色涂料时,在LED灯具照射下隧道内的光环境及人眼视觉特性开展试验研究。研究结果表明,在相同LED灯具光源照射下,涂装不同类型涂料的侧壁亮度不同,反射率为0.91的蓄能发光涂料与反射率为0.97的白色涂料壁面相较于反射率为0.37的灰色涂料壁面亮度增大,隧道侧壁与路面的亮度比可达1.24~1.35。隧道侧壁亮度提升后,隧道内路面亮度与人眼对路面上障碍物的可视距离会随之增大。当隧道内的路面亮度基本一致、侧壁亮度不同时,相较于灰色涂料侧壁隧道,蓄能发光涂料侧壁和白色涂料侧壁隧道内,照明灯具的功率可分别降低14.6%和9.8%;同时,人眼对隧道内路面上障碍物的可视距离基本相同,行车时司驾人员瞳孔直径变化规律基本相同,并无不适反应。在隧道照明设计中,可通过采用蓄能发光涂料或高反射率的涂料装饰侧壁并降低照明灯具功率来实现公路隧道的照明节能。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
冯守中1 周 龙2 冒卫星1 李 洁3 高 巍1
关键词公路隧道   侧壁涂料   反射率   光环境   视觉特性   试验     
Abstract: The priority in lighting design of highway tunnel is the pavement brightness in the tunnel, while the tun? nel side wall brightness is usually designed to be no more than 60% of the pavement brightness. Side wall is an important part of the luminous environment in tunnel, but its impact on the luminous environment in tunnel and the pavement lighting quality has not drawn much attention. Therefore this paper expounds an experimental study on the luminous environment in a tunnel that is illuminated by LED lights, and on the visual characteristics of human eyes,where the side wall of the tunnel is painted with energy-accumulating luminescent and white or grey coatings. As the study results indicate: With illumination by the same LED light, different types of coatings will bring different brightness levels of side wall. The wall surfaces painted with the energy-accumulating luminescent coating with 0.91 reflectivity and white coating with 0.97 reflectivity have greater brightness than the wall surface painted with the grey coating with 0.37 reflectivity. The brightness ratio between side wall and pavement of a tunnel can be 1.24~1.35. As the side wall brightness increases, the pavement brightness in tunnel and the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement detected by human eyes will increase. If the pavement brightness remains essentially unchanged while the side wall brightness is changed in a tunnel, the power of the illuminating lamps can be reduced by 14.6% and 9.8% respectively in a tunnel with side wall painted with energy-accumulating luminescent coating and in a tunnel with side wall painted with white coating, as compared with a tunnel with side wall painted with grey coating; besides, the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement in the tunnel detected by human eyes essentially remains unchanged, the variation pattern of the pupil diameter of the driver in a moving vehicle essentially remains the same, and the driver feels no discomfort. In the lighting design of tunnel, lighting energy conservation of a highway tunnel can be accomplished by painting the side wall with energy-accumulating luminescent coating or a coating with high reflectivity, and so reducing the power of the illuminating lamps.
KeywordsHighway tunnel,   Side wall coating,   Reflectivity,   Luminous environment,   Visual characteristics,   Test     
基金资助:山西省交通科研课题项目(2019-JKKJ-59);河北省交通科研课题项目( TH-201909).
作者简介: 冯守中(1963- ),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程研究、咨询及建设管理工作,E-mail:fsz63@vip.163.com. 通讯作者:周 龙(1988-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事隧道照明与防灾领域的研究工作,E-mail:zhoulonglmn@126.com.
引用本文:   
冯守中1 周 龙2 冒卫星1 李 洁3 高 巍1 .侧壁涂料对公路隧道光环境与人眼视觉特性影响试验研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(3): 220-227
FENG Shouzhong1 ZHOU Long2 MAO Weixing1 LI Jie3 GAO Wei1 .Experimental Study on the Impact of Side Wall Coating on Luminous Environment of Highway Tunnel and Visual Characteristics of Human Eyes[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 220-227
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I3/220
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[2] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[3] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[4] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[5] 钟武霖1 韩兴博1 叶 飞1 王 涵1 曹校勇2 奚魏征2.隧道竖井钢波纹板支护风阻及优化设计研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 197-207
[6] 耿 麒 谢卫峰 杨沐霖 汪学斌 黄雨枫 李 磊 李晓斌 李志彪.TBM多功能缩尺破岩试验平台研制[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 208-218
[7] 刘朋飞1,2 曾德星2 王 霄3 杨 钊2 李 钰2.盾构泥饼分解剂作用效果评价试验及应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 230-237
[8] 陈 明1 赵大鹏2 张敬祥1 高 慧1 王 兴1 郝建帅3 房奎圳3.同步注浆材料中盾构渣土的再利用及性能试验[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 248-258
[9] 葛正辉1 郑建国1 李新志2 陈 鹏3 宁志玮2 王鹏程2.不同形式拱架初期支护变形规律实测与数值研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[10] 李 强1 韩兴博2 谢 举1 李 超3 李 醒3 马爱华1 毕洁夫3 叶 飞2.光储并网型微电网隧道供能策略与实践——以五丁关隧道光伏电站工程为例[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 60-66
[11] 胡云进1,,2,3 朱铭伟1,2,3 郜会彩1,2,3 任智豪1,2,3.地下水渗流对能源盾构隧道换热性能的影响[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 50-59
[12] 郑腾跃1 王树英1,2 袁 潇1.基于数值模拟与机器学习的盾构下穿既有线施工参数优化[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 100-107
[13] 王敬勇1,2 王 平2 杨 锦2 吉 锋3.基于物理模型试验的碳质千枚岩隧道支护结构优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 160-169
[14] 李鹏飞 张佳龙 张明聚 崔小普 黄正东 马 锐.隧道钢波纹板-模袋混凝土支护接头受力性能试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 170-181
[15] 唐 协1,2 林国进1,2 张 航2.公路隧道机械钻爆法施工适应对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 217-228
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术