[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (1) :89-97    DOI:
研究与分析 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
水下隧道复合式衬砌水压特征研究
(北京交通大学土建学院,北京 100044)
Study on the Characteristics of Water Pressure on the Composite Lining in Underwater Tunnels
(School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044)
Download: PDF (1157KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 水下隧道无论在施工期还是运营期,时刻都处于有无限水源补给且水头恒定的水体下,因此水压是水下隧道衬砌结构设计的主要荷载之一。文章通过理论分析、模型试验和对厦门海底隧道现场实测数据的分析,研究了水下隧道复合式衬砌的水压特征。研究表明:(1)仅在考虑隧道排水时,注浆圈才能发挥减小对衬砌水压的作用。随注浆厚度增加,衬砌水压减少,且注浆效果越好,衬砌水压降低越明显,而相应注浆圈分担的水压也就越高,但是注浆圈厚度的无限增大对减少衬砌水压作用甚微,合理的注浆厚度在3~8 m范围内;(2)随着初期支护抗渗性的加强,衬砌水压明显增加。设计时必须考虑初期支护承受一定的水压。初期支护水压主要取决于注浆层与初期支护渗透系数的比值;(3)不论注浆水平如何,不论初期支护、二次衬砌渗透系数如何,二次衬砌水压折减系数的大小关键取决于进入初期支护的水量能被多大程度地排出,即取决于隧道排水量与进入初期支护水量的比值。在确定二次衬砌水压时,还应考虑初始渗流场的影响。研究可为水下隧道和高水压山岭隧道的结构设计提供参考。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王秀英
谭忠盛
关键词:   
Abstract: Abstract An underwater tunnel, whether in the construction or operation phase, is always located under the water, with an unlimited water supply and constant head; thus, the water pressure is one of the main loads to be considered for the lining structure design for an underwater tunnel. In this paper, the characteristics of water pressure on composite linings in underwater tunnels are studied by a theoretical analysis, model test, and field-measured data analysis of the Xiamen subsea tunnel. The research show that: (1) when only considering tunnel drainage, the grouting circle can reduce the water pressure on the lining. Water pressure on the lining reduces with an increase of grouting thickness, and the better the grouting effect is, the more obvious the reduction in water pressure, with the higher water pressure shared by the relevant grouting circle. However, the unlimited increase of the thickness of the grouting circle has little effect on the reduction of the water pressure, so a reasonable grouting thickness is 3~8m; (2) the water pressure on the lining obviously increases with the strengthening of primary support permeability resistance. Certain water pressure on the primary support must be considered in the design, and the water pressure on the primary support is mainly dependent on the ratio of the permeability coefficient of the grouting layer to that of the primary support; and (3) the reduction coefficient of water pressure on the secondary lining depends on the discharge of water permeating into the primary lining, namely, the ratio of the water drainage of the tunnel to the volume of water permeating into the primary lining, regardless of the grouting effect and the permeability coefficient of the primary support and secondary lining. During the determination of water pressure on the secondary lining, the impact of the initial seepage field has to be considered. This research can provide a reference for the structural design of underwater tunnels and mountain tunnels with high water pressure.
KeywordsKeywords Underwater tunnel,   Primary support,   Secondary lining,   Water pressure     
出版日期: 2014-01-20
基金资助:

基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50878019,51178026).

作者简介: 作者简介:王秀英(1970-),女,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学和研究工作,E-mail:xy98_wang@126.com.
引用本文:   
王秀英, 谭忠盛 .水下隧道复合式衬砌水压特征研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2015,V52(1): 89-97
WANG Xiu-Ying, Tan-Zhong-Sheng .Study on the Characteristics of Water Pressure on the Composite Lining in Underwater Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(1): 89-97
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2015/V52/I1/89
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术