Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (5) :51-55    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Analysis of the Impact of Interface Contact Friction on the Seismic Effect of Deeply Buried Shield Tunnels
(1 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2 China Construction South Investment Co, Ltd., Shenzhen 518000)
Download: PDF (1957KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Based on a quasi-static finite-element numerical model, the law of influence of the seismic effect of a shield tunnel is analyzed for four types of interface contact characteristics, e.g. full contact without slipping, slipping with friction Ⅰ, slipping with friction Ⅱ and full slipping, respectively. Meanwhile, the feasibility and rationality of the quasi-static numerical method is verified by the quasi-static analytical method based on the elastic center method and empty complex function based quasi-static analytical method. The results show that: 1) the quasi-static analysis of circular shield tunnels is feasible with the friction elements simulating interface characteristics under proper boundary conditions; 2) full contact without slipping and full slipping are two ultimate states considering interface contact friction characteristics; 3) under the action of horizontal shear waves, the additional seismic bending moment and axial force distribute as an asymmetrical axis on the axis of 45° and -45°, with a distribution pattern of an asymmetricone; and 4) the additional seismic axial force increases with the increase of the interface friction coefficient,while the additional bending moment decreases with the increase of the interface friction coefficient, which means the friction coefficient has more influence on the axial force than on bending moment.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Yu- 1
2 Yan-Qi-Xiang- 1 He- Chuan- 1 Geng- Ping- 1
KeywordsDeeply buried shield tunnel   Contact friction   Quasi-static numerical method   Seismic effect     
Abstract: Based on a quasi-static finite-element numerical model, the law of influence of the seismic effect of a shield tunnel is analyzed for four types of interface contact characteristics, e.g. full contact without slipping, slipping with friction Ⅰ, slipping with friction Ⅱ and full slipping, respectively. Meanwhile, the feasibility and rationality of the quasi-static numerical method is verified by the quasi-static analytical method based on the elastic center method and empty complex function based quasi-static analytical method. The results show that: 1) the quasi-static analysis of circular shield tunnels is feasible with the friction elements simulating interface characteristics under proper boundary conditions; 2) full contact without slipping and full slipping are two ultimate states considering interface contact friction characteristics; 3) under the action of horizontal shear waves, the additional seismic bending moment and axial force distribute as an asymmetrical axis on the axis of 45° and -45°, with a distribution pattern of an asymmetricone; and 4) the additional seismic axial force increases with the increase of the interface friction coefficient,while the additional bending moment decreases with the increase of the interface friction coefficient, which means the friction coefficient has more influence on the axial force than on bending moment.
KeywordsDeeply buried shield tunnel,   Contact friction,   Quasi-static numerical method,   Seismic effect     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yu- 1, 2 Yan-Qi-Xiang- 1 He- Chuan- 1 Geng- Ping- 1 .Analysis of the Impact of Interface Contact Friction on the Seismic Effect of Deeply Buried Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(5): 51-55
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I5/51
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY