Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :83-90    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Application and Comparison of Conventional and Generalized Response Displacement Methods for Shallow-Buried DOT Shield Tunnels
(Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (2945KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Guide null
Abstract The basic principles, analytical method and problems regarding the conventional response displacement method are described. The formulas of formation spring stiffness are given with the assumption of both a slip and noslip contact surface, and a generalized response displacement method is put forward based on the formation-structure model. As for this method, the seismic force displacement is applied on the boundary at the left and right side,which are restricted by horizontal sliding support, and the boundary of the underlying bedrock is restricted by a fixed support. The frictional contact unit is introduced between the boundaries of the formation interface to imitate the slipping effect of the interface. Under different interfaces, a comparison between the conventional response displacement method and the generalized response displacement method for shallow-buried DOT shield tunnels shows that: 1) the generalized response displacement method with the assumption of interface slippage can reflect the seis? mic effects of the DOT shield tunnel more accurately; 2) under the seismic force displacement, the additional bending moment of the segment lining distributes in an inclined number 8, and the additional bending moment of the center pillar is linear with the inflection point near the midpoint; 3) the additional axial force on the segment is basically pressure, and the additional axial force on the center pillar is one of tension with an unchanged value along the height; and 4) the additional shear force on the segment distributes as a number 8 and the additional shear force on the center pillar remains unchanged along the height.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsDOT shield tunnel   Aseismic analysis   Response displacement method   Generalized response displace? ment method   Application and comparison     
Abstract: The basic principles, analytical method and problems regarding the conventional response displacement method are described. The formulas of formation spring stiffness are given with the assumption of both a slip and noslip contact surface, and a generalized response displacement method is put forward based on the formation-structure model. As for this method, the seismic force displacement is applied on the boundary at the left and right side,which are restricted by horizontal sliding support, and the boundary of the underlying bedrock is restricted by a fixed support. The frictional contact unit is introduced between the boundaries of the formation interface to imitate the slipping effect of the interface. Under different interfaces, a comparison between the conventional response displacement method and the generalized response displacement method for shallow-buried DOT shield tunnels shows that: 1) the generalized response displacement method with the assumption of interface slippage can reflect the seis? mic effects of the DOT shield tunnel more accurately; 2) under the seismic force displacement, the additional bending moment of the segment lining distributes in an inclined number 8, and the additional bending moment of the center pillar is linear with the inflection point near the midpoint; 3) the additional axial force on the segment is basically pressure, and the additional axial force on the center pillar is one of tension with an unchanged value along the height; and 4) the additional shear force on the segment distributes as a number 8 and the additional shear force on the center pillar remains unchanged along the height.
KeywordsDOT shield tunnel,   Aseismic analysis,   Response displacement method,   Generalized response displace? ment method,   Application and comparison     
Cite this article:   
.Application and Comparison of Conventional and Generalized Response Displacement Methods for Shallow-Buried DOT Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 83-90
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/83
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY