Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (3) :18-24    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Research on Interpretation Method of TRT Test Results Based on GOCAD
(1 PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu 610072; 2 Construction Investment and Management Co., Ltd., CDCI, Chengdu 610037)
Download: PDF (2598KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The TRT technology has been more and more widely applied to tunnel geological prediction. However, the result interpretation is always the key and difficult point in geological prediction, since there are a few kinds of interpretation methods and the results are not quite precise. Aiming at the problems in result interpretation of TRT,such as the low combining degree of prediction criteria with actual geological conditions of test area and low prediction accuracy of disaster body′ s development degree and position, some corresponding improvement methods were proposed, namely the actual geological conditions of TRT test section were introduced to GOCAD to create a model and then the TRT 3D data were introduced to the model, realizing the interconnection between TRT test images and actual geological conditions. By adding varieties of color combination in the result image, the TRT result image can reflect both the disaster body and its development degree. A model was established by introducing tunnel coordinates and TRT test data to GOCAD, and the relative position relation between the disaster body and tunnel is understood, the precise prediction of development position and scale of disaster body was realized. Case application shows the improved TRT result interpretation method can greatly increase the accuracy and precision of TRT geological prediction.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YUAN Xianfan1 LIAO Dan2
KeywordsTunnel   TRT   Interpretation method   GOCAD   Chromatography combination   Precise prediction     
Abstract: The TRT technology has been more and more widely applied to tunnel geological prediction. However, the result interpretation is always the key and difficult point in geological prediction, since there are a few kinds of interpretation methods and the results are not quite precise. Aiming at the problems in result interpretation of TRT,such as the low combining degree of prediction criteria with actual geological conditions of test area and low prediction accuracy of disaster body′ s development degree and position, some corresponding improvement methods were proposed, namely the actual geological conditions of TRT test section were introduced to GOCAD to create a model and then the TRT 3D data were introduced to the model, realizing the interconnection between TRT test images and actual geological conditions. By adding varieties of color combination in the result image, the TRT result image can reflect both the disaster body and its development degree. A model was established by introducing tunnel coordinates and TRT test data to GOCAD, and the relative position relation between the disaster body and tunnel is understood, the precise prediction of development position and scale of disaster body was realized. Case application shows the improved TRT result interpretation method can greatly increase the accuracy and precision of TRT geological prediction.
KeywordsTunnel,   TRT,   Interpretation method,   GOCAD,   Chromatography combination,   Precise prediction     
Cite this article:   
YUAN Xianfan1 LIAO Dan2 .Research on Interpretation Method of TRT Test Results Based on GOCAD[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(3): 18-24
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I3/18
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY