Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :220-227    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Experimental Study on the Impact of Side Wall Coating on Luminous Environment of Highway Tunnel and Visual Characteristics of Human Eyes
(1. Zhongyi New Material Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 239500; 2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094; 3. Anhui Guangyi Scientific Research Testing Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 239000)
Download: PDF (3634KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The priority in lighting design of highway tunnel is the pavement brightness in the tunnel, while the tun? nel side wall brightness is usually designed to be no more than 60% of the pavement brightness. Side wall is an important part of the luminous environment in tunnel, but its impact on the luminous environment in tunnel and the pavement lighting quality has not drawn much attention. Therefore this paper expounds an experimental study on the luminous environment in a tunnel that is illuminated by LED lights, and on the visual characteristics of human eyes,where the side wall of the tunnel is painted with energy-accumulating luminescent and white or grey coatings. As the study results indicate: With illumination by the same LED light, different types of coatings will bring different brightness levels of side wall. The wall surfaces painted with the energy-accumulating luminescent coating with 0.91 reflectivity and white coating with 0.97 reflectivity have greater brightness than the wall surface painted with the grey coating with 0.37 reflectivity. The brightness ratio between side wall and pavement of a tunnel can be 1.24~1.35. As the side wall brightness increases, the pavement brightness in tunnel and the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement detected by human eyes will increase. If the pavement brightness remains essentially unchanged while the side wall brightness is changed in a tunnel, the power of the illuminating lamps can be reduced by 14.6% and 9.8% respectively in a tunnel with side wall painted with energy-accumulating luminescent coating and in a tunnel with side wall painted with white coating, as compared with a tunnel with side wall painted with grey coating; besides, the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement in the tunnel detected by human eyes essentially remains unchanged, the variation pattern of the pupil diameter of the driver in a moving vehicle essentially remains the same, and the driver feels no discomfort. In the lighting design of tunnel, lighting energy conservation of a highway tunnel can be accomplished by painting the side wall with energy-accumulating luminescent coating or a coating with high reflectivity, and so reducing the power of the illuminating lamps.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
FENG Shouzhong1 ZHOU Long2 MAO Weixing1 LI Jie3 GAO Wei1
KeywordsHighway tunnel   Side wall coating   Reflectivity   Luminous environment   Visual characteristics   Test     
Abstract: The priority in lighting design of highway tunnel is the pavement brightness in the tunnel, while the tun? nel side wall brightness is usually designed to be no more than 60% of the pavement brightness. Side wall is an important part of the luminous environment in tunnel, but its impact on the luminous environment in tunnel and the pavement lighting quality has not drawn much attention. Therefore this paper expounds an experimental study on the luminous environment in a tunnel that is illuminated by LED lights, and on the visual characteristics of human eyes,where the side wall of the tunnel is painted with energy-accumulating luminescent and white or grey coatings. As the study results indicate: With illumination by the same LED light, different types of coatings will bring different brightness levels of side wall. The wall surfaces painted with the energy-accumulating luminescent coating with 0.91 reflectivity and white coating with 0.97 reflectivity have greater brightness than the wall surface painted with the grey coating with 0.37 reflectivity. The brightness ratio between side wall and pavement of a tunnel can be 1.24~1.35. As the side wall brightness increases, the pavement brightness in tunnel and the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement detected by human eyes will increase. If the pavement brightness remains essentially unchanged while the side wall brightness is changed in a tunnel, the power of the illuminating lamps can be reduced by 14.6% and 9.8% respectively in a tunnel with side wall painted with energy-accumulating luminescent coating and in a tunnel with side wall painted with white coating, as compared with a tunnel with side wall painted with grey coating; besides, the visual distance of any obstruction on the pavement in the tunnel detected by human eyes essentially remains unchanged, the variation pattern of the pupil diameter of the driver in a moving vehicle essentially remains the same, and the driver feels no discomfort. In the lighting design of tunnel, lighting energy conservation of a highway tunnel can be accomplished by painting the side wall with energy-accumulating luminescent coating or a coating with high reflectivity, and so reducing the power of the illuminating lamps.
KeywordsHighway tunnel,   Side wall coating,   Reflectivity,   Luminous environment,   Visual characteristics,   Test     
Cite this article:   
FENG Shouzhong1 ZHOU Long2 MAO Weixing1 LI Jie3 GAO Wei1 .Experimental Study on the Impact of Side Wall Coating on Luminous Environment of Highway Tunnel and Visual Characteristics of Human Eyes[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 220-227
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I3/220
 
No references of article
[1] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[2] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[3] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[4] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[5] ZHONG Wulin1 HAN Xingbo1 YE Fei1 WANG Han1 CAO Xiaoyong2 XI Weizheng2.Research on Wind Resistance and Optimization Design of Steel Corrugated Plate Support for Tunnel Shafts[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 197-207
[6] GENG Qi XIE Weifeng YANG Mulin WANG Xuebin HUANG Yufeng LI Lei LI Xiaobin LI Zhibiao.Development of a Scaled Multifunctional TBM Rock-breaking Test Platform[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 208-218
[7] LIU Pengfei1,2 ZENG Dexing2 WANG Xiao3 YANG Zhao2 LI Yu2.Experimental Evaluation and Application Study on the Shield Muck Cake Decomposition Agents[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 230-237
[8] CHEN Ming1 ZHAO Dapeng2 ZHANG Jingxiang1 GAO Hui1 WANG Xing1 HAO Jianshuai3 FANG Kuizhen3.The Reuse and Performance Testing of Shield Tunnel Mucks in Synchronous Grouting Materials[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 248-258
[9] GE Zhenghui ZHENG Jianguo1 LI Xinzhi CHEN Peng3 NING Zhiwei WANG Pengcheng2.Field Measurement and Numerical Study on Deformation Behavior of Initial Supports with Different Arch Types[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[10] LI Qiang1 HAN Xingbo2 XIE Ju1 LI Chao3 LI Xing3 MA Aihua1 BI Jiefu3 YE Fei.Tunnel Energy Supply Strategy and Practice with Grid-Connected PV-Storage Microgrid: A Case Study of the Wudingguan Tunnel Photovoltaic Power Station Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 60-66
[11] HU Yunjin1,2,3 ZHU Mingwei GAO Huicai REN Zhihao1,2,3.null[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 50-59
[12] ZHENG Tengyue1 WANG Shuying1,2 YUAN Xiao1.Optimization of Construction Parameters for Shield Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Lines Based on Numerical Simulation and Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 100-107
[13] WANG JingYong1,2 WANG Ping2 YANG Jin2 JI Feng3.Optimization Study on the Support Structure of a Tunnel in Carbonaceous Phyllite Using Physical Model Tests[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 160-169
[14] LI Pengfei ZHANG Jialong ZHANG Mingju CUI Xiaopu HUANG Zhengdong MA Rui.Experimental Study on the Mechanical Performance of Steel Corrugated Plate-fabricform Concrete Support Joints in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 170-181
[15] TANG Xie LIN Guojin1, 2 ZHANG Hang2.Adaptive Strategies for Mechanized Drill-and-Blast Construction in Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 217-228
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY