Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (4) :119-126    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Influence of Construction Sequence and Different Types of Pipes on Ground Surface Settlement Caused by the Construction of Two-layer Jacking-pipes
(1 Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060; 2 Municipal Engineering Technology Research Institute,Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510060)
Download: PDF (4041KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Aiming at the ground surface settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction and its influen? tial factors, a three-dimensional model was established by finite element software to simulate and calculate pipejacking construction under considering interaction of bulkhead pressure, ground loss and grouting, to discuss the impact of construction sequence and pipe type on ground surface settlement. The results show that the maximum settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction occurs on the upper side of the lower jacking pipe and it reduces by 17.84% with the excavation of upper jacking-pipe, and the heaving at lower side barely changes; the main affected area of ground surface settlement is within the scope of - 3.2D1~3.2D1 around the jacking-pipe axis; the maximum ground surface settlement caused by the antecedent construction of the lower jacking-pipe occupies 78.05% of the total settlement; subsequent excavation of the upper jacking-pipe results in obvious heaving in front of it, the total settlement decreases and ground surface settlement increases after passing of jacking-pipe head, the maximum settlement increases by 21.95%, the increasing and attenuation rates of ground heaving both reduce with the advance of jacking-pipe; the ground surface settlement caused by the precedent construction of the upper-layer jacking-pipe increases largely by 20.5% compared with that of precedent construction of the lower-layer jackingpipe; the ground surface settlement caused by concrete jacking-pipe is larger than that of steel jacking-pipe, the maximum settlement increases by 26.13% and the affected scope increases to -4.8D1~4.8D1.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
AN Guanfeng1
2 WANG Tan1
2 SI Haifeng1
2 LIU Tianjun1
2
KeywordsPipe jacking construction;Two-layer jacking-pipes;Ground surface settlement;Construction se? quence   Pipe type   Numerical analysis     
Abstract: Aiming at the ground surface settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction and its influen? tial factors, a three-dimensional model was established by finite element software to simulate and calculate pipejacking construction under considering interaction of bulkhead pressure, ground loss and grouting, to discuss the impact of construction sequence and pipe type on ground surface settlement. The results show that the maximum settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction occurs on the upper side of the lower jacking pipe and it reduces by 17.84% with the excavation of upper jacking-pipe, and the heaving at lower side barely changes; the main affected area of ground surface settlement is within the scope of - 3.2D1~3.2D1 around the jacking-pipe axis; the maximum ground surface settlement caused by the antecedent construction of the lower jacking-pipe occupies 78.05% of the total settlement; subsequent excavation of the upper jacking-pipe results in obvious heaving in front of it, the total settlement decreases and ground surface settlement increases after passing of jacking-pipe head, the maximum settlement increases by 21.95%, the increasing and attenuation rates of ground heaving both reduce with the advance of jacking-pipe; the ground surface settlement caused by the precedent construction of the upper-layer jacking-pipe increases largely by 20.5% compared with that of precedent construction of the lower-layer jackingpipe; the ground surface settlement caused by concrete jacking-pipe is larger than that of steel jacking-pipe, the maximum settlement increases by 26.13% and the affected scope increases to -4.8D1~4.8D1.
KeywordsPipe jacking construction;Two-layer jacking-pipes;Ground surface settlement;Construction se? quence,   Pipe type,   Numerical analysis     
Cite this article:   
AN Guanfeng1, 2 WANG Tan1, 2 SI Haifeng1 etc .Influence of Construction Sequence and Different Types of Pipes on Ground Surface Settlement Caused by the Construction of Two-layer Jacking-pipes[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(4): 119-126
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I4/119
 
No references of article
[1] DENG Mingjiang1 TAN Zhongsheng2.Some Issues during TBM Trial Advance of Super-long Tunnel Group and Development Direction of Construction Technology[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 1-12
[2] SONG Yongjun CHE Yongxin REN Jianxi ZHANG Kun.Experimental Study on Creep Characteristics of Anchored Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 13-18
[3] YAN Gengsheng1,2 HE Xiaoliang1,2 HAN Jinming3 ZHAO Shuang3 ZHAO Cheng1,2.Analysis on the Survey Techniques of Shield Tunnels in Sandy Pebble Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 19-25
[4] ZHANG Heng ZHANG Gang SUN Jianchun ZHUYimo CHEN Shougen.Correlation Analysis of Q Value and Mechanical Parameters of Surrounding Rocks and Its Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 26-34
[5] LI Junda1,2 LI Yuanfu1,2 LI Shiqi1,3 LIU Kai1,3 WANG Guangkai1,2.A CBR-based Aided Decision Model for the Mountain Railway Tunnel Excavation Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 35-41
[6] WANG Qiuyi1 YANG Kui2 MAO Jinlong2 YANG Qingyuan3 ZHAO Boming3.Study on the Comprehensive Aseismic Measures for the Secondary Lining Structure of Highway Tunnels in Nine-degree Seismic Region[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 42-49
[7] ZHAO Licai1,2 YU Jianxing1.Design Optimization for the Rapid Excavation of Inclined Shaft of the Long Tunnel and Construction Period Estimation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 50-57
[8] WANG Xu1 MENG Lu1 YANG Gang2 LU Song1.On Influencing Factors of the Tunnel Geological Prediction Results Obtained by Multi-source Seismic Interferometry[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 58-66
[9] TANG Bin XU Wenping.Discussion and Suggestions for Explosion-proof Based Modification of Construction Machinery and Vehicles in the Gas Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 67-71
[10] CAI Yaning ZHANG Jinxun WU Fumei.Brief Introduction to Revision of the Segment Section of“Code for Construction and Acceptance of Shield Tunnelling Method”[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 72-76
[11] CHEN Xi1 ZHAO Yong2 YANG Yushun3.Effect of Rock Mechanical Parameters on Stability of Tunnel Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 77-84
[12] LIU Siwei1 YANG Hongyun1,2 PAN Ruikai1.Research on Stratified Thickness Inversion of Roadway Composite Roof[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 85-91
[13] LI Fengyun.The Influential Factors on Instability of Slope during Excavation of a Metro Station Based on Upper Limit Analysis Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 92-97
[14] CUI Guangyao1 WANG Xuelai1 ZUO Kuixian1 WANG Mingnian2,3 JING Hongfei4.Study on Rigid and Flexible Compound Disaster Reduction Technology for the Tunnel with High Rock Temperature in Meizoseismal Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 98-103
[15] WANG Xing1 QIN Wei2 MA Jia3 WANG Lei1.Study on Local Structural Resistance of Ventilation System in Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 104-113
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY