Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (2) :28-37    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study of the Impact of Single-and Double-tube Tunnel Systems on Rockburst in Deep-buried Extra-long Tunnelling
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 2. China Railway Tunnel Group Sanchu Co., Ltd.,Shenzhen 518052)
Download: PDF (6124KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Rockburst is one of the main disasters for tunnelling under high ground stress. Taking the rockburst sec? tion of Ping′an Tunnel with high ground stress, which is located on Chengdu-Lanzhou Railway, as the study object,this paper adopts combined methods of filed measurement, numerical analysis, and laboratory test, and with respect to rockburst development mechanism, energy density change and rockburst strength it comprehensively analyzes the impact of two construction schemes (single-tube double-track tunnel system and double-tube single-track tunnel system) on the rockburst in deep-buried extra-long tunnels with high ground stress. The study results show that the order relation of maximum energy density at various locations of the tunnel is Uside wall >Uhance >Utunnel face >Uvault, and rockburst easily occurs at the working face of the tunnel section to be excavated and both side walls of excavated and supported section; compared with vault, hance, side wall and other locations, more energy would be released at the tunnel face, and the stress release holes shall be reasonably installed in the process of excavation; the double-tube single-track tunnel system scheme can effectively reduce the rockburst intensity and the rockburst hazards, so as to better avoid the occurrence of rockburst.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LUO Chun1 ZHANG Zhiqiang1 LIN Dirui1 TANG Zelin2
KeywordsDeep-buried tunnel   High ground stress   Rockburst   Single-tube double-track tunnel scheme   Doubletube single-track tunnel scheme   Scheme comparison   Energy density     
Abstract: Rockburst is one of the main disasters for tunnelling under high ground stress. Taking the rockburst sec? tion of Ping′an Tunnel with high ground stress, which is located on Chengdu-Lanzhou Railway, as the study object,this paper adopts combined methods of filed measurement, numerical analysis, and laboratory test, and with respect to rockburst development mechanism, energy density change and rockburst strength it comprehensively analyzes the impact of two construction schemes (single-tube double-track tunnel system and double-tube single-track tunnel system) on the rockburst in deep-buried extra-long tunnels with high ground stress. The study results show that the order relation of maximum energy density at various locations of the tunnel is Uside wall >Uhance >Utunnel face >Uvault, and rockburst easily occurs at the working face of the tunnel section to be excavated and both side walls of excavated and supported section; compared with vault, hance, side wall and other locations, more energy would be released at the tunnel face, and the stress release holes shall be reasonably installed in the process of excavation; the double-tube single-track tunnel system scheme can effectively reduce the rockburst intensity and the rockburst hazards, so as to better avoid the occurrence of rockburst.
KeywordsDeep-buried tunnel,   High ground stress,   Rockburst,   Single-tube double-track tunnel scheme,   Doubletube single-track tunnel scheme,   Scheme comparison,   Energy density     
Cite this article:   
LUO Chun1 ZHANG Zhiqiang1 LIN Dirui1 TANG Zelin2 .Study of the Impact of Single-and Double-tube Tunnel Systems on Rockburst in Deep-buried Extra-long Tunnelling[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(2): 28-37
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I2/28
 
No references of article
[1] YUAN Wei1 LU Junfu2 LIU Jinsong1 WU Junmeng1.Cause Analysis of Persistent Heaving of Tunnel Floors in Red-bed Mudstone with Complex Geo-stress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 242-250
[2] FENG Huanhuan1,2 HONG Kairong1,2 YANG Yandong2 YANG Luwei1 SI Jingzhao1 YOU Jinhu3.Research and Application of Key Construction Technologies for TBM-driven Tunnels under Extreme Complex Geological Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 42-54
[3] CHEN Zhimin1,2 LI Jiangpeng1 XUE Zhiwen3.Model Test Study on‘Lost’Deformation and Corresponding Control Measures in Soft Rock Tunnels with Extremely High Ground Stress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 164-175
[4] CHANG Gang1,2 PAI Lifang3,4 PANG Weijun1,4 WU Honggang1,2,4 YAN Lizhen1.Study on the Effect on Deformation of the Surrounding Rock Induced by DeepBuried Tunnelling under Hard Rock Combination Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 73-77
[5] HUI Qiang1 ZHANG Jun2 JIANG Haibo1.Study on the Characteristics and Distribution Laws of Plastic Zone Induced by Deep-buried High-geostress Hydraulic Tunnelling in Jointed Rock Mass[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 86-94
[6] HUO Mengzhe1 LIU Xiqi1 LIN Manqing2.Mechanical Mechanism of the Shear Rock Burst in Intact Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 10-18
[7] WEI Yinghua LIU Fei.Numerical Simulation Analysis of the Rockburst Mechanism in the Tunnel with High Geostress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(6): 46-54
[8] WANG Jianyu.The Key Way is to Release the Genuine Rock Pressure—Discussion on Problems of Tunnelling in Squeezing Ground[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 1-11
[9] DAI Cong1,3 HE Chuan2,3 LIU Chuankun2,3 GUO Wenqi2,3.Model Test Study on Influence of Excavation Methods on Stability of Surrounding Rocks of the Soft Rock Tunnel in High Geostress Field[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 141-149
[10] LIAO Yankai1 GUO Deping1 LIU Zhiqiang2 CHEN Dayang2.Application of Peripheral Strain and Squeezing Factor Methods in the Prediction of Large Deformation of Tunnel Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 20-26
[11] LI Chang1,2 WANG Gang1,2 QIU Wenge1,2,3 GONG Lun1,2 ZHAO Yingchun4 WANG Qiuhui4.Research and Application of Support Resistant Limiting Dampers in the Tunnel with High Horizontal Geostress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(3): 15-29
[12] WEI Xinjiang1,2 CHEN Taotao2 WANG Xiao2 YU Xingfu1 ZHOU Lianying1.Progress in Research of the Rockburst Hazard[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(2): 1-12
[13] DU Shuai1 WANG Yang2.Experimental Study on Rockburst of Jinping Marble Based on an Analysis of Acoustic Emission Waveform[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(1): 130-135
[14] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[15] LI Yanzong ZHAO Shuang.Analysis on Construction Schemes and Deformation of Multi-layer Support Structure for a Soft Rock Tunnel under High Geostress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(3): 161-165
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY