Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (2) :94-102    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
A Study on Reduction Coefficient of External Hydraulic Pressure at the Lining of Diversion Tunnel in Saturated Q2 Loess Stratum
(1.Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi′an 710048; 2. Technical Research Center for UrbanGeological and Underground Space Engineering of Shaanxi, Xi′an 710068; 3. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi′an 710043)
Download: PDF (3324KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The value of the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure has a great impact on the design of the lining structure of hydraulic tunnels. This paper is based on the case of a water diversion tunnel crossing Q2 loess stratum and investigates the saturated permeability characteristics of in-situ and remodeled Q2 loess through indoor tests and in-situ pumping tests. Also, the study comparatively investigates the changing pattern of the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure on the lining under different five factors: stratigraphic conditions, limited discharge rate, tunnel size, groundwater level, and thickness of the ground grouting ring, through a model test and according to the principle of flow-solid coupling analysis of the FLAC 3D program. The results show that the increase in the limited discharge rate of the tunnel and the thickness of the grouted reinforcement ring will significantly reduce the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure at the lining, and the increase in the permeability coefficient of the ground will cause an increasing trend that follows a logarithmic function for the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure. Also, as the equivalent radius of the tunnel increases, the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure decreases before an increase, while the groundwater level has an insignificant effect on the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure. For this project, it is recommended to take the value of 0.57~0.71 for the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHU Caihui1
2 YING Li2 YANG Qiqiang2 LI Yubo3
KeywordsSaturated Q2 loess stratum   Water diversion tunnel   Reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure   Model test   Numerical analysis     
Abstract: The value of the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure has a great impact on the design of the lining structure of hydraulic tunnels. This paper is based on the case of a water diversion tunnel crossing Q2 loess stratum and investigates the saturated permeability characteristics of in-situ and remodeled Q2 loess through indoor tests and in-situ pumping tests. Also, the study comparatively investigates the changing pattern of the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure on the lining under different five factors: stratigraphic conditions, limited discharge rate, tunnel size, groundwater level, and thickness of the ground grouting ring, through a model test and according to the principle of flow-solid coupling analysis of the FLAC 3D program. The results show that the increase in the limited discharge rate of the tunnel and the thickness of the grouted reinforcement ring will significantly reduce the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure at the lining, and the increase in the permeability coefficient of the ground will cause an increasing trend that follows a logarithmic function for the reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure. Also, as the equivalent radius of the tunnel increases, the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure decreases before an increase, while the groundwater level has an insignificant effect on the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure. For this project, it is recommended to take the value of 0.57~0.71 for the reduction coefficient of the external hydraulic pressure.
KeywordsSaturated Q2 loess stratum,   Water diversion tunnel,   Reduction coefficient of external hydraulic pressure,   Model test,   Numerical analysis     
Cite this article:   
ZHU Caihui1, 2 YING Li2 YANG Qiqiang2 LI Yubo3 .A Study on Reduction Coefficient of External Hydraulic Pressure at the Lining of Diversion Tunnel in Saturated Q2 Loess Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(2): 94-102
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I2/94
 
No references of article
[1] ZHANG Xuejun1 NIE Qiqiang2 GONG Yuanjiang3.Study on Large Deformation Law of Soft Rock Tunnel in Red Bed in Central Yunnan[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 156-163
[2] XU Peng1,2 PENG Peng1,2 JU Guoquan3 ZHAO Wanqiang3 ZHANG Zhiqiang1,2.A Model Test Study on the Catastrophic Occurrence of Water Inrush on the Tunnel Face in Sand-slate Interbedded Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 271-281
[3] YUAN Xianghua1,2 ZHU Yanfei1 ZHU Yeting1,2.Test Verification of Synchronous Technology Combining Shield Tunnelling with Segment Assembling Based on the Principle of Maximum Pressure Redundancy[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 106-113
[4] CHEN Rendong1 LU Ping2 SUN Ye1 LIU Minggao1 PANG Kang1.Centrifuge Model Test of the Cross Passages in Super Large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 114-124
[5] LIU Zonghan1,2 HAN Fenglei1,2 ZHANG Xuefu1,2 LI Hongliang3 QIN Zhen1,2 ZHAO Yicong1,2.Analysis on the Construction Hazard Causes of Tunnels with Altitude Difference in the Tilted Soft-hard Interbedded Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 197-207
[6] CUI Qinglong1 LI Jin1 GAO Binyong2 XIONG Xinyue2.Mechanical Properties of Three-inclined Bolts in Longitudinal Joint of Large-diameter Shield Tunnel Segment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 63-71
[7] ZHU Yeting1,2 GONG Wei1,2 QIN Yuan1,2 YUAN Xianghua1,2 WU Wenfei1,2 ZHANG Boya1,2 ZHU Yanfei1.Closed-loop Control Technology of Shield Thrust Hydro-cylinder Pressure Based on Target Total Thrust Vector[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 170-178
[8] LIU Xuezeng1 GU Wenchuan1 YANG Zhilu2,3 GUO Qiaokun4 HE Guohua5 FENG Jin6.Test Study on the Reinforcement Effect of Bonding Steel to Damaged Tunnels under the Lateral Loads[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 187-195
[9] LIANG Rongzhu1,2 WEI Shi1 WANG Xinxin3 SUN Lianwei3 WU Xiaojian3.Comparative Test and Analysis of the Deformation in Enclosure Structure of Internally-braced and Cantilevered Locked Steel-pipe Pile Foundation Pits[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 172-182
[10] HUANG Shiguang1 YANG Yanna2 FAN Quanzhong2 HUANG Jingyu2 YU Lei2.Experimental Study on the Changing Pattern of Design Parameters of Controlled Drainage in Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 201-210
[11] SUN Shuangchi1,2 SHEN Yi1 ZHOU Zhiyan2 ZHOU Long1 ZHU Hehua1.Analaysis of Deformation and Its Control Measures for Large-diameter Shield Tunnels Passing under Building Complexes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 103-110
[12] WANG Huaizheng1 SONG Zhanping1,2 ZHANG Xuewen3 TIAN Xiaoxu1,2 PAN Hongwei4.Optimization and Application of the Construction Scheme for Large-section Tunnels in Water-rich and Weakly Cemented Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 210-219
[13] YANG Chunshan1 Wei Lixin1 MO Haihong2.Impact on and Prediction of Segment Opening of Shield Tunnels under Seismic Action[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 133-140
[14] WANG Fei.A Model Test Study on the Dewatering in the Construction of Ultra-deep Shafts in Deep and Thick Sand and Pebble Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 176-182
[15] CHEN Zhimin1,2 LI Jiangpeng1 XUE Zhiwen3.Model Test Study on‘Lost’Deformation and Corresponding Control Measures in Soft Rock Tunnels with Extremely High Ground Stress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 164-175
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY