Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (1) :153-158    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
GPR Forward Simulation of Filled Karst Caves in Advance Geological Prediction for Tunnels
(1 Karst Dynamics Laboratory, MLR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Guilin 541004; 2 China Railway Southwest Research Institute Co. Ltd., Chengdu 611731)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract  Unfavorable geologic bodies such as karst caves often turn up during tunneling. Based on different fillers, karst caves are classified into four types: air-filled, water-filled, silt-filled, or grit-filled. Applying the principles of the finite difference time domain method (FDTD), a forward simulation for common karst diseases was performed, and the results of the theoretical simulation were verified using project cases. The results show that the essential feature of forward simulated images of karst caves is a hyperbolic event. From the kinematics and dynamical characteristics of the hyperbolic event, we can infer the geometric position of karst caves and qualitatively determine what their fillers are. The simulated results are in agreement with the measured ones.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU
WEI 1
Zhou
BIN 2
Gan-Fu-Ping-1
ZHAO
WEI 1
Keywords Tunnel   Geological prediction   Filled karst caves   GPR   Forward simulation     
Abstract: Unfavorable geologic bodies such as karst caves often turn up during tunneling. Based on different fillers, karst caves are classified into four types: air-filled, water-filled, silt-filled, or grit-filled. Applying the principles of the finite difference time domain method (FDTD), a forward simulation for common karst diseases was performed, and the results of the theoretical simulation were verified using project cases. The results show that the essential feature of forward simulated images of karst caves is a hyperbolic event. From the kinematics and dynamical characteristics of the hyperbolic event, we can infer the geometric position of karst caves and qualitatively determine what their fillers are. The simulated results are in agreement with the measured ones.
Keywords Tunnel,   Geological prediction,   Filled karst caves,   GPR,   Forward simulation     
published: 2013-05-27
Cite this article:   
LIU , WEI 1, Zhou etc .GPR Forward Simulation of Filled Karst Caves in Advance Geological Prediction for Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(1): 153-158
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I1/153
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[3] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[4] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[5] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[6] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[7] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[8] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[9] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[10] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[11] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
[12] LIU Cheng GUAN Huisheng XIE Youhui SONG Yingpeng.Study on Driving Posture and Deviation Correction Curve of the Shield Machine[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 105-112
[13] LIU Jun1 NAN Zhiling1,2 JIN Xin3.Calculation Model of Earth Chamber Pressure during Non-Barrier Launching of EPB Shield[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 113-118
[14] ZHANG Yang1 LIU Shannan1 WU Jun1 CHEN Jiakang1 XIAO Xiaochun2 LI Lei2.Sensitivity and Its Impact of Strata Parameters on Ground Surface Settlements during Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 127-134
[15] QIU Peiyun1 SHI Rongjian2.Modeling and Analysis of Temperature Field of Tunnel Concrete Structure with Cold Plates[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 143-148
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY