Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (6) :41-49    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Discussion of the Seismic Failure Mechanism of a Tunnel Based on the Improved Dynamic Strength Reduction Method
(1 North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450011; 2 Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To explore the failure mechanism of tunnel structures in earthquakes, a static field was imposed to dynamic calculation by shifting the boundary between static and dynamic, which was taken as an initial stress condition for the improvement of the dynamic strength reduction method, the feasibility of which was proven by a computing application. The improved dynamic strength reduction method is used to calculate and analyze the failure mechanism of deep and shallow buried tunnels under seismic action, and the results show that failure processes are different for tunnels with different depths. For the shallow-buried tunnel, failure begins at the two sides above the tunnel and gradually forms a fracture plane cutting through the ground; for the deep tunnel, the plastic strain first occurs at four stress-concentrated corners with a smaller plastic strain on the crown and floor, and then a continuous plastic strain zone is formed gradually from the two sides until failure finally occurs. In light of seismic action, this paper analyzes the factors affecting tunnel failure, studies the failure mechanism of tunnel structures of different surrounding rock grades, spans, structure types, and buried depths, and finally carries on a comparative analysis for each influence factor.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Chang-Xin-1
2
吕Xiao-Chun-1
KeywordsImproved dynamic strength reduction method   Tunnel   Seismic failure mechanism   Influence factor     
Abstract: To explore the failure mechanism of tunnel structures in earthquakes, a static field was imposed to dynamic calculation by shifting the boundary between static and dynamic, which was taken as an initial stress condition for the improvement of the dynamic strength reduction method, the feasibility of which was proven by a computing application. The improved dynamic strength reduction method is used to calculate and analyze the failure mechanism of deep and shallow buried tunnels under seismic action, and the results show that failure processes are different for tunnels with different depths. For the shallow-buried tunnel, failure begins at the two sides above the tunnel and gradually forms a fracture plane cutting through the ground; for the deep tunnel, the plastic strain first occurs at four stress-concentrated corners with a smaller plastic strain on the crown and floor, and then a continuous plastic strain zone is formed gradually from the two sides until failure finally occurs. In light of seismic action, this paper analyzes the factors affecting tunnel failure, studies the failure mechanism of tunnel structures of different surrounding rock grades, spans, structure types, and buried depths, and finally carries on a comparative analysis for each influence factor.
KeywordsImproved dynamic strength reduction method,   Tunnel,   Seismic failure mechanism,   Influence factor     
published: 2013-09-16
Cite this article:   
SUN Chang-Xin-1, 2 , 吕Xiao-Chun-1 .Discussion of the Seismic Failure Mechanism of a Tunnel Based on the Improved Dynamic Strength Reduction Method[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(6): 41-49
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I6/41
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY