Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (4) :158-164    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Discussion of a Practical Calculation Method for the Maximum Support Pressure of Slurry Shield Tunnels in Sand Strata
(1 CCCC Second Highway Consultants Co.Ltd., Wuhan 430056; 2 CCCC Nanjing Weisan Rd. River-Crossing Tunnel Construction Headquarters, Nanjing 211800)
Download: PDF (1069KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The upper and lower limits of support pressure are key for determining the reasonable support pressure of slurry shields. Based on an analysis of the stability mechanism of the working face during slurry shield operation, it is determined that there are three necessary conditions for ground breakdown failure in shallow-buried sand strata: 1) severe slurry dehydration or slurry penetration directly into the ground, causing a drastic increase of the extra-static pore water pressure; 2) good directionality of the slurry with a great pressure difference compared with that of static water pressure in the ground due to higher support pressure; and 3) a permeability coefficient of the overburden that is too small to cause slurry directly seeps and diffuses into the ground, creating an extremely high water pressure gradient at the contact site of the soil particles, which means that the extra-static pore water pressure increases along with the high-pressure slurry permeating directly into the ground, and seepage failure occurs thereafter due to large water head difference. Accordingly, a practical calculation method of maximum support pressure, which is convenient and requires fewer parameters, is proposed. The maximum support pressure is calculated and a comparison with a practice case is carried out based on a certain river-crossing tunnel project, verifying the rationality and effectiveness of the method.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsSlurry shield tunnel   Sand strta   Maximum support pressure   Seepage failure   Practical calculation method     
Abstract: The upper and lower limits of support pressure are key for determining the reasonable support pressure of slurry shields. Based on an analysis of the stability mechanism of the working face during slurry shield operation, it is determined that there are three necessary conditions for ground breakdown failure in shallow-buried sand strata: 1) severe slurry dehydration or slurry penetration directly into the ground, causing a drastic increase of the extra-static pore water pressure; 2) good directionality of the slurry with a great pressure difference compared with that of static water pressure in the ground due to higher support pressure; and 3) a permeability coefficient of the overburden that is too small to cause slurry directly seeps and diffuses into the ground, creating an extremely high water pressure gradient at the contact site of the soil particles, which means that the extra-static pore water pressure increases along with the high-pressure slurry permeating directly into the ground, and seepage failure occurs thereafter due to large water head difference. Accordingly, a practical calculation method of maximum support pressure, which is convenient and requires fewer parameters, is proposed. The maximum support pressure is calculated and a comparison with a practice case is carried out based on a certain river-crossing tunnel project, verifying the rationality and effectiveness of the method.
KeywordsSlurry shield tunnel,   Sand strta,   Maximum support pressure,   Seepage failure,   Practical calculation method     
Cite this article:   
.Discussion of a Practical Calculation Method for the Maximum Support Pressure of Slurry Shield Tunnels in Sand Strata[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(4): 158-164
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2015/V52/I4/158
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY