Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (3) :148-154    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Efficiency of Rock Breaking by TBM Cutters in a Joint Rock Mass with Different Confining Pressures
(1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004; 2 State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to improve TBM tunnelling efficiency and reduce construction costs, it is necessary to study the efficiency of rock breaking in a joint rock mass. UDEC was adopted to perform research on the influence of joint spacing, joint inclination, cutter spacing and penetration on rock breaking efficiency. The results show that: 1) the trend of specific energy consumption decreasing with increasing confining pressure slows down when the joint inclination increases or decreases from 30° to 90° or from 30° to 0° , and the increase of confining pressure is adverse to rock breaking when the joint inclination is approaching 90° or 0°; 2) The smaller the joint spacing, the more obvious the influence of confining pressure on specific energy consumption. With an increase of joint spacing, the influence of confining pressure on specific energy consumption decreases until it has no effect; 3) When the joint inclination is around 0° , it is better to choose a small cutter spacing as long as it meets the requirements of installation; when the joint angle is around 30° , the specific energy consumption is the lowest if the cutter spacing is about 100 mm; when the joint inclination is around 60° , the specific energy consumption is the lowest if the cutter spacing is about 120mm; and 4) If cracks produced by two cutters are cutting through the joint rock mass, the rock breaking efficiency is best with small rock mass penetration.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTBM cutter   Efficiency of rock breaking   Confining pressure   Joint inclination   Joint spacing   Cutter spacing   Penetration     
Abstract: In order to improve TBM tunnelling efficiency and reduce construction costs, it is necessary to study the efficiency of rock breaking in a joint rock mass. UDEC was adopted to perform research on the influence of joint spacing, joint inclination, cutter spacing and penetration on rock breaking efficiency. The results show that: 1) the trend of specific energy consumption decreasing with increasing confining pressure slows down when the joint inclination increases or decreases from 30° to 90° or from 30° to 0° , and the increase of confining pressure is adverse to rock breaking when the joint inclination is approaching 90° or 0°; 2) The smaller the joint spacing, the more obvious the influence of confining pressure on specific energy consumption. With an increase of joint spacing, the influence of confining pressure on specific energy consumption decreases until it has no effect; 3) When the joint inclination is around 0° , it is better to choose a small cutter spacing as long as it meets the requirements of installation; when the joint angle is around 30° , the specific energy consumption is the lowest if the cutter spacing is about 100 mm; when the joint inclination is around 60° , the specific energy consumption is the lowest if the cutter spacing is about 120mm; and 4) If cracks produced by two cutters are cutting through the joint rock mass, the rock breaking efficiency is best with small rock mass penetration.
KeywordsTBM cutter,   Efficiency of rock breaking,   Confining pressure,   Joint inclination,   Joint spacing,   Cutter spacing,   Penetration     
Cite this article:   
.Efficiency of Rock Breaking by TBM Cutters in a Joint Rock Mass with Different Confining Pressures[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(3): 148-154
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I3/148
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] YANG Shaoyu1 WANG Xiaotian2 ZHANG Peiyuan1 LIU Shengchen1 LI Shuchen2 LI Luoning2.A Review of Spray-applied Waterproofing Membrane Technology for Drill-and-Blast Tunnels [J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 1-14
[4] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[5] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[6] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[7] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[8] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[9] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[10] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[11] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[12] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[13] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[14] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[15] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY