Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2018, Vol. 55 Issue (4) :132-138    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Load-Bearing Stages of Joint Shear Keys and Settlement Control Standards of Immersed Tunnel Elegments
(1 School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043; 2 School of Highway, Chang′an University, Xi′an 710064; 3 The Key Laboratory for Health Monitoring and Control of Large Structures, Shijiazhuang 050043; 4 Power China Huadong Engineering Co. Ltd., Hangzhou 311122)
Download: PDF (2087KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Shear keys are the main load-bearing components for resisting expansion and rotation of elegment joints and are a structural guarantee of joint waterproofing when differential settlements of foundations occur because of load or soil layer factors. Therefore, differential settlements were taken as the variable loads in 1∶4.69 large-scale model tests and 3D FEM numerical simulations to study the load-bearing laws of shear keys on elegment joints affected by differential settlements. The test results show that the load-bearing processes of shear keys can be divided into three stages under the effects of longitudinal and transverse differential settlements. In the first stage, gaps and rubber pads between the shear keys and their grooves start to be compressed, and the stress growth rate is relatively small. In the second stage, shear keys undertake loads effectively and the stress growth rate is much larger, comparatively, while the elegment joints help the shear keys undertake loads through local compression or friction when differential settlements reach a certain extent. In the third stage, shear keys are inclined to yielding, and though shear keys can still bear more loads, micro-cracks occur. Based on the shearing forces of shear keys in the limited state of normal use, the longitudinal and transverse allowable differential settlements of elegments are determined as 11.5 mm and 11.1 mm, respectively. It is recommended that several prestressed cables on the roof and floor of the elements remain after immersion in order to improve the structural safety of the shear keys.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsImmersed tunnel   Elegment joints   Shear keys   Differential settlements   Load-bearing stages   Standard for settlement control     
Abstract: Shear keys are the main load-bearing components for resisting expansion and rotation of elegment joints and are a structural guarantee of joint waterproofing when differential settlements of foundations occur because of load or soil layer factors. Therefore, differential settlements were taken as the variable loads in 1∶4.69 large-scale model tests and 3D FEM numerical simulations to study the load-bearing laws of shear keys on elegment joints affected by differential settlements. The test results show that the load-bearing processes of shear keys can be divided into three stages under the effects of longitudinal and transverse differential settlements. In the first stage, gaps and rubber pads between the shear keys and their grooves start to be compressed, and the stress growth rate is relatively small. In the second stage, shear keys undertake loads effectively and the stress growth rate is much larger, comparatively, while the elegment joints help the shear keys undertake loads through local compression or friction when differential settlements reach a certain extent. In the third stage, shear keys are inclined to yielding, and though shear keys can still bear more loads, micro-cracks occur. Based on the shearing forces of shear keys in the limited state of normal use, the longitudinal and transverse allowable differential settlements of elegments are determined as 11.5 mm and 11.1 mm, respectively. It is recommended that several prestressed cables on the roof and floor of the elements remain after immersion in order to improve the structural safety of the shear keys.
KeywordsImmersed tunnel,   Elegment joints,   Shear keys,   Differential settlements,   Load-bearing stages,   Standard for settlement control     
Cite this article:   
.Load-Bearing Stages of Joint Shear Keys and Settlement Control Standards of Immersed Tunnel Elegments[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,V55(4): 132-138
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2018/V55/I4/132
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY