[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (3) :1-7    DOI:
研究与综述 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
盾构隧道建造阶段低碳化影响因子与措施研究
(1同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2上海隧道工程股份有限公司,上海 200082)
Study of Influential Factors and Measures for Low Carbonization During the Construction of Shield Tunnels
(1 Department of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering,Tongji University, Shanghai 200092; 2 Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200082)
Download: PDF (1023KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 目前,隧道碳排放主要是通过规划设计阶段的估算或竣工后隧道整体排放量的统计得到,较少考虑每一环隧道碳排放的差异性及其影响因素。文章基于排放系数法,对虹梅南路隧道施工现场能耗进行实时统计,计算出了该隧道工程建造阶段每一环实际碳排放,并结合地层与施工参数对施工碳排放环与环之间的差异性进行了分析探讨。结果表明: (1)盾构施工平均每环碳排放约为56 t,其中材料碳排放约占93%。背景工程通过埋深分档、减少构造钢筋等措施减少了约12 000 t碳排放(即200环的排放量); (2)对于施工碳排放,⑦2粉砂层中由于穿行阻力大、刀盘扭矩高、粉砂对于泥浆破坏强等因素导致隧道每环排放量约为⑤3粘质粉土层中的一倍。通过避免将隧道长距离埋设于⑦2层粉砂中可以有效降低其碳排放量值,而盾构推进距离、隧道埋深对其影响不大; (3)盾构停顿一天产生的碳排放约为4 400 kg,隧道施工过程中应着力提高盾构推进效率,避免盾构机长时间的停顿。盾构的日平均进度保证在3环以上,相比1环日平均进度可减少至少60%的环平均排放量。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李乔松1
白云1
李林2
关键词:   
Abstract: In tunnel engineering at present, carbon emissions are generally estimated during the planning design stage or obtained by statistics of total emissions after completion. However, the difference of carbon emissions in each ring and relevant influential factors are seldom considered. For this paper, based on the emission coefficient method, real-time statistics were determined regarding the in-situ energy consumption of the South Hongmei Road tunnel, and the actual carbon emissions per ring were obtained. Furthermore, the difference of the actual carbon emissions in each ring is analyzed and discussed by considering the parameters of stratum and construction. The results show that: 1) the average carbon emission per ring of shield tunnelling is about 56 t, with material-generated carbon emissions being around 93%, and for the studied case the carbon emission was reduced by approximately 12 000 t(corresponding to the total emissions produced by 200 rings) by means of depth grading and steel-bar reduction; 2) for construction-generated carbon emissions, shield tunnelling in the ⑦2 silty sand layer features high penetration resistance, high cutterhead torque, and highly damaging effects on the slurry, so its carbon emission per ring is about twice of that of the ⑤3 clayey silt layer, and the carbon emissions can be effectively reduced by avoiding a long-distance tunnel buried in the ⑦2 silty sand layer, while the shield advance distance and the buried depth have little effect; and 3) the carbon emissions generated by a one-day stop of shield driving is about 4 400 kg, it is therefore important to improve the advancing efficiency of the shield and to avoid long shield stoppages during tunnel construction. The daily average shield advance rate should be more than three rings—this can reduce the average emissions per ring by at least 60% compared with a one-ring advance rate per day.
KeywordsShield machine,   Tunnelling,   Carbon emissions,   Emission coefficient method,   Low carbonization     
出版日期: 2014-10-11
基金资助:

基金项目:教育部“长江学者和创新团队发展计划”资助项目(IRT1029).

作者简介: 作者简介: 李乔松(1989-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土地下工程等方面的科研工作,E-mail:powerlqs@163.com
引用本文:   
李乔松1, 白云1, 李林2 .盾构隧道建造阶段低碳化影响因子与措施研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2015,V52(3): 1-7
LI Qiao-Song-1, BAI Yun-1, LI Lin-2 .Study of Influential Factors and Measures for Low Carbonization During the Construction of Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(3): 1-7
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2015/V52/I3/1
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术