[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (5) :70-77    DOI:
研究与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
大断面矩形顶管隧道开挖面土体稳定性研究
(1 内蒙古科技大学土木工程学院,包头 014010;2 内蒙古科技大学数理与生物工程学院,包头014010;3 包头城建集团股份有限公司,包头 014010)
Soil Mass Stability at the Working Face of a Rectangular Pipe-Jacking Tunnel with a Large Section
(1 College of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014000;2 College of Mathematical and Biological Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014000;3 Baotou Urban Construction Group Ltd.,Co., Baotou 014000)
Download: PDF (3308KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 文章以采用土压平衡矩形顶管法施工的内蒙古科技大学地下通道为背景,采用理论分析、数值模拟、现场监控量测等手段,对砂砾石地层条件下矩形顶管开挖面的主动和被动破坏规律进行了研究,主要得到了以下结论:(1)考虑顶管隧道开挖面为矩形断面的特点,建立梯形楔体计算模型,推导出开挖面主动破坏时的极限支护应力计算公式并应用于实际工程,采用该公式计算得到的极限支护压力与数值模拟计算结果相差较小,两种研究方法得到了相互验证;(2)采用 FLAC3D数值模拟得到的地表沉降槽与实测地表沉降槽形态基本相似,近似服从正态分布,且地表沉降值基本接近;(3)随着支护应力比的减小,开挖面塑性区逐渐由开挖面前方向斜上方发展,当支护应力比为 0.165时,开挖面前方土体水平位移骤然增加,开挖面塑性区延伸至地表,土体丧失整体稳定性,发生主动破坏,且从开挖面失稳后地表塑性区扩展形态来看,基本接近梯形楔形体形状,从而验证了解析公式计算模型的合理性;(4)随着支护应力比的增大,开挖面前方土体塑性区自开挖面顶部向地表斜上方延伸,当支护应力比为 3.0时,塑性区发展至地面,此时土体失稳,发生被动破坏,其塑性区范围远小于主动破坏时的塑性区。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:   
Abstract: Based on an underpass project at the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, which was constructed with an earth pressure balance rectangular pipe-jacking machine, the active and passive failure laws of the excavation face of the rectangular jacking pipe in sand and gravel are studied using theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, and site monitoring. The following conclusions are determined: 1) in light of the characteristics of rectangular sections, a trapezoidal wedge calculation model is set up, a calculation formula for extreme support stress during active failure of the tunnel face is derived and applied in a practical project, and the limited support pressure calculated by the above formula is determined to be very close to that of the numerical simulation, so the two methods are verified; 2) the form of the ground surface settlement trough simulated by FLAC3D is similar to the measured ground settlement trough, which approximately complies with a normal distribution and is very close to the ground settlement value; 3) with a decrease of the support stress ratio, the plastic zone of the excavation face develops from the front of the face to the inclined top. When support stress ratio is 0.165, the soil horizontal displacement in front of the excavation face suddenly increases, the plastic zone extends to the ground surface and active failure occurs with a loss of overall stability. The development pattern of the plastic zone at the surface after excavation face failure resembles a trapezoidal wedge shape, so the rationality of the calculation model is verified; and 4) with an increase of the support stress ratio, the plastic zone in front of the excavation face develops from the face top to the inclined top and reaches the ground surface, resulting in instability of the soil mass with passive failure occur? ring when the support stress ratio is 3.0, and the plastic zone is much smaller than that of active failure.
KeywordsRectangular pipe-jacking,   Sand and gravel stratum,   Stability of excavation face,   Numerical simulation,   Support force     
基金资助:

基金项目:内蒙古科自然科学基金项目(2017MS(LH)0523);内蒙古自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目(NJZY14167).

作者简介: 作者简介:许有俊(1979-),男,教授,博士,主要从事隧道、地下工程等方面的理论与技术研究工作,E-mail:xyoujun@163.com.
引用本文:   
.大断面矩形顶管隧道开挖面土体稳定性研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2017,V54(5): 70-77
.Soil Mass Stability at the Working Face of a Rectangular Pipe-Jacking Tunnel with a Large Section[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(5): 70-77
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2017/V54/I5/70
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术