[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (2) :117-126    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
基于两种拱盖法修建的青岛地区上软下硬岩质地层大跨隧道结构稳定性研究
(中铁隧道勘察设计研究院有限公司,广州 511400)
Study on Structural Stability of Mined Large-Span Tunnels Constructed by Two Arch-Cover Methods in Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Rock Stratum of Qingdao Area
(China Railway Tunnel Consultants Co., Ltd. , Guangzhou 511400)
Download: PDF (5316KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 拱盖法是基于纵深刚度差异较大的“上软下硬”地层条件,在充分吸取盖挖法、双侧壁导坑法等工法的成功经验或者不足之处的基础上发展起来的一种暗挖大跨隧道修建技术,拱盖法主要有双层初期支护拱盖法和二次衬砌拱盖法。文章以青岛地铁某暗挖大跨车站为例,结合站址范围内上软下硬复合地层的特征,通过数值方法对两种拱盖法修筑的隧道结构稳定性进行分析研究。结果表明:1)二次衬砌拱盖法采用纵向9 m拆撑安全步距施工时,外层初期支护棚护作用的“空间刚度效应”不足以弥补其拱盖的“拱”效应,双层初期支护拱盖法修筑技术更有利于隧道变形控制;2)隧道下部岩体开挖时拱盖结构的承载、保护作用显著,但在相同等地质环境条件下,二次衬砌拱盖法施工对拱脚岩体的塑性破坏作用更明显,换言之即二次衬砌拱脚对岩基的强度和刚度要求更高;3)初期支护拱盖法结构受力控制部位为拱肩及拱脚,二次衬砌拱盖法结构受力控制部位为拱脚,后者拱脚控制内力约为前者的1.56倍,前者的“梁”效应比较明显,后者的“脚”效应比较明显;4)为地铁百年服务工程安全计,建议优先考虑采用双层初期支护拱盖法施工。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
施玉晶
关键词:   
Abstract: As for the upper-soft and lower-hard rock stratum with larger stiffness differences in vertical depth, the arch-cover method is developed based on the cover-excavation method and double side heading method. The archcover method includes the arch-cover method with double-layer primary support and the arch-cover method with secondly lining. Taking a mined large-span station of Qingdao metro as an example, a numerical analysis on structural stability of the tunnel constructed by two arch-over methods is conducted in light of the characteristics of the upper-soft and lower-hard rock stratum. The results show that: (1) as for the arch-cover method with secondary lining, when tunnel is constructed at a safe strut dismantling distance of 9 m in longitudinal direction, the "spatial stiffness effect" of shed protection of outer primary support can′ t make up for the "arch" effect of arch-cover, the construction technology of arch-cover method with double-layer primary support is more conducive to tunnel deformation control; (2) the arch-cover structure has significant bearing and protection functions during excavating the lower part of the tunnel, however, the plastic damage of rock mass at arch springing is more obvious during the construction by arch-cover method with secondary lining under the same geological conditions, in other words, the arch springing of secondary lining requires higher strength and rigidity of the rock foundation; (3) the internal force con? trol positions of structure by arch-cover method with double-layer primary support are spandrel and arch springing,and the control position is the arch springing for the structure by arch-cover method with secondary lining, the control internal force of arch springing of the latter is about 1.56 times of that of the former, the "beam" effect of the former is more obvious while the "foot" effect of the latter is more obvious; (4) from the perspective of safety, it is suggested that the arch-cover method with double-layer primary support should be adopted.
KeywordsArch-cover method with double-layer primary support,   Arch-cover method with secondary lining,   Up? per-soft and lower-hard stratum,   Settlement,   Plastic zone,   Internal force analysis,   Engineering cost-performance ratio     
作者简介: 作者简介:施玉晶(1986-),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面研究工作,E-mail:175404664@qq.com.
引用本文:   
施玉晶 .基于两种拱盖法修建的青岛地区上软下硬岩质地层大跨隧道结构稳定性研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2020,V57(2): 117-126
SHI Yujing .Study on Structural Stability of Mined Large-Span Tunnels Constructed by Two Arch-Cover Methods in Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Rock Stratum of Qingdao Area[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(2): 117-126
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2020/V57/I2/117
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术