[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (6) :133-141    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
沟槽式高填拱形明洞力学特性及其影响因素分析
(1兰州交通大学土木工程学院,兰州 730070 ;2 中国铁路北京局集团有限公司北京高铁工务段,北京 100071)
Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Influencing Factors of High-filled Cut-and-Cover Tunnel in Trench
(1 College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou Gansu 730070; 2 Beijing High-speed Railway Works Maintenance Division of China Railway Beijing Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100071)
Download: PDF (4139KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 针对高填土荷载作用下沟槽式拱形明洞结构受力研究较少问题,文章首先通过室内模型试验研究了沟槽式高填黄土拱形明洞受力特性,得到了明洞周围土压力分布形式以及拱圈外侧应力随填土高度的变化规律。结果显示,明洞顶曲线段土压力呈“中间大、两边小”分布特征。当填土较低(<1.2倍洞径高度)时,明洞竖向等效均布荷载大于规范值。而当填土较高(≥1.2倍洞径高度)时,明洞竖向等效均布荷载小于规范值。随着填土高度的增加,明洞两侧水平土压力由“正梯形”分布向“矩形”分布转变。明洞底土压力呈“均布荷载”分布。随着填土高度的增加,拱肩截面外侧应力变化较小,而拱顶、侧墙及拱底截面外侧应力显著增加;然后对试验过程进行数值模拟分析。结果显示,明洞周围土压力平均相对误差为11.3%,外侧应力平均相对误差为14.5%,可验证试验数据的正确性及计算参数的合理性;最后进一步探讨了填土高度、沟槽边坡坡角、填料性质和沟槽与明洞宽度比等参数的敏感性对明洞衬砌结构内力的影响。结果表明,沟槽边坡坡角、沟槽与明洞宽度比影响最大,实际工程中应尽量提高边坡坡角,降低沟槽与明洞宽度比,以期改善明洞结构受力。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马 莉 1 王起才 1 李 盛 1 刘亚朋 2 宁贵霞 1 韩国强 1
关键词:   
Abstract: As for few studies on the stress state of the arched open cut tunnel under high backfilling, the mechani? cal characteristics of high-filled open cut tunnels with arched cross-section in the cutting trench is studied through laboratory tests, the earth pressure distributions around open cut tunnel and stress variations outside tunnel arch ring along with backfilling height are obtained. The results show that the earth pressure distribution at the arched section on the top of open cut tunnel is in the shape of being large in the middle and small on both sides. When the backfilling height is low (less than 1.2 times of the tunnel height), the equivalent vertical uniform load is greater than the value specified in specifications, while being less than this value specified in specifications when the backfilling is high (equal to or greater than 1.2 times of the tunnel height). With the increase of backfilling height, the distribution pattern of earth pressure on both sides of open cut tunnel changes from "positive trapezoid" to "rectangular", and the earth pressure on bottom of open cut tunnel is uniformly distributed. With the increase of backfilling height, the external stress of the section at the spandrel varies little, but increases obviously at the vault, side wall and the bottom of the open cut tunnel. Subsequent numerical simulation analysis shows that the average relative error of earth pressure around open cut tunnel is 11.3%, and the average relative error of external stress is 14.5%, verifying the correctness of experimental data and the rationality of the numerical simulation parameters. Finally, the effects on the internal force of lining structure induced by sensitivity of the influential factors are discussed, such as the backfilling height, slope angle, backfill properties and the trench-width ratio. The results show that the slope angle and trench-width ratio have the most significant effect on the internal force of lining structure. To improve the me? chanical properties of the open cut tunnel in the practical engineering, the slope angle should be increased, and the trench-width ratio should be reduced as much as possible.
KeywordsLoess,   High-filled open cut tunnels,   Trench,   Mechanical characteristics,   Influencing factor,   Internal forces     
基金资助:基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51668036,51868041);长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(IRT_15R29)
作者简介: 作者简介:马 莉(1982-),女,在读博士研究生,讲师,主要从事桥梁与隧道方面的教学与研究工作,E-mail: 451906654@qq.com. 通讯作者:王起才(1962-),男,博士,教授,主要从事桥梁与隧道工程方面的研究工作,E-mail:13909486262@139.com
引用本文:   
马 莉 1 王起才 1 李 盛 1 刘亚朋 2 宁贵霞 1 韩国强 1 .沟槽式高填拱形明洞力学特性及其影响因素分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2020,V57(6): 133-141
MA Li1 WANG Qicai1 LI Sheng1 LIU Yapeng2 NING Guixia1 HAN Guoqiang1 .Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Influencing Factors of High-filled Cut-and-Cover Tunnel in Trench[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(6): 133-141
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2020/V57/I6/133
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 李瑞俊1 宋宗莹2 李 琛1 王文斌2 任育珍3,4 蔡建华3,4 张家旭3,4.重载铁路梁家山隧道病害多源融合诊断与处置对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] 张小龙.桩基荷载作用下地铁盾构隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] 李克玺1,2 党建东3 张 见3 叶光祥4 王晓军1,2 陈青林1,2 曹世荣2 张 河1,2.基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] 周彩荣1 易黎明1 马山青2 周 蠡3 于金弘4,5.三点加载下高性能纤维混凝土顶管承载特性及配筋方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] 王永刚1 崔翌堃1 吴九七2,3 黄 俊4 沈 翔2,3 杨 奎4 苏 栋2,3.考虑不同磨损形式下的滚刀受力与磨损对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] 徐才坚1 陈星宇1 雷明林1 张兴龙2 孙怀远2 李晓军2.隧道施工掌子面前方围岩富水性数字孪生与风险决策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] 杨 颖1 倪 凯1 葛 林2 张明飞3 王晓睿4.弱光条件下基于改进Unet模型的隧道渗水病害图像分割[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] 苏开春1 付 锐2,3 曾弘锐2,3 冷希乔4 郭 春2,3.基于DBO-A-LSTM的公路隧道短时多步交通量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] 刘 杨1 邵泽楷2 田浩帆2 张汝溪1 郑 波3 王峥峥2.高速公路隧道下穿房柱式煤矿采空区爆破施工煤柱 损伤规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术