[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :220-227    DOI:
数值分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
建筑敏感区隧道破除抗滑桩进洞转换体系设计与施工方案优选
(1.广州市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,广州 510060;2.广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院,广州 510006)
Optimization of the Design and Construction Scheme of Tunnel Entry and Conver? sion System for Removal of Anti-slide Pile in Architecturally Sensitive Area
(1. Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006)
Download: PDF (5883KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要  依托攀枝花阳光隧道,进行隧道开挖方案分析,并基于破除抗滑桩过程中围岩-结构受力特征,提出进洞转换体系设计方案。建立隧道开挖全过程精细计算模型,探讨不同工法对应的围岩、隧道及建筑物变形响应特征,综合考虑安全性、经济性、可行性及工期等多项指标进行方案优选研究,并进行现场实测验证。结果表明:在“扶壁式挡墙+抗滑桩”组合结构转换体系作用下围岩-结构位移得到有效控制且能满足整体稳定;预留核心土法施工较CRD法施工产生的力学扰动更明显,最大相差约40%,但两种工法开挖引起的地层、转换结构及建筑物位移均满足要求;隧道破除抗滑桩开挖阶段地层主要发生竖向位移,转换体系在紧贴截桩位置响应最明显,既有建筑向隧道侧发生微倾;原施工方案CRD法力学扰动小,但工程费用高、技术难度大、工序复杂、工期长,综合比选后采用预留核心土法进行施工。现场实测表明,所选方案具有合理性,依托工程取得了较理想的施工效果。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨春山1 杨雪强2 王雅甜2 林永贵1
关键词山岭隧道   破除抗滑桩   方案优选   转换体系设计   力学响应   数值模拟   现场实测     
Abstract: A tunnel excavation scheme analysis is conducted by using the Yangguang Tunnel in Panzhihua, and the conversion system is proposed based on the stressing characteristics of surrounding rock and structure during removal of anti-slide pile. The fine calculation model for tunnel excavation process has been created, the deformation response characteristics of surrounding rock, tunnel and building corresponding to different construction methods have been investigated, the study on scheme optimization has been conducted by taking into account the indicators including safety, economic efficiency, feasibility and duration, and field test and demonstration have been completed.The results indicate: under the effect of the conversion system in "counterfort retaining wall + anti-slide pile" composite structure, the surrounding rock-structure displacement is effectively inhibited and overall stability is maintained; compared with CRD method, reserved core method will generate more obvious mechanical disturbance, with maximally 40% difference between the two, but both construction methods meet the requirements for the displacement of stratum, conversion structure and building; during excavation for removal of anti-slide pile in tunnel, the stratum mainly experiences vertical displacement, the conversion system shows the most obvious response right at the pile cutting position, and the existing building is slightly inclined towards the tunnel side; in the original construction construction method, the CRD method generates less mechanical disturbance, but comes with high engineering cost, high technical difficulty, complex process and long duration. After a comprehensive comparison, the reserved core method is selected. According to field survey, the selected scheme is rational and brings desirable construction results in the project.
KeywordsMountain tunnel removal of anti-slide pile,   Scheme optimization,   Conversion system design,   Mechani? cal response,   Numerical simulation,   Field survey     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(51878192);广东省住房和城乡建设厅科技创新计划项目(2022-K4-094918).
作者简介: 杨春山(1986-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事隧道与地下结构设计研究工作,E-mail:soildoctor@163.com.
引用本文:   
杨春山1 杨雪强2 王雅甜2 林永贵1 .建筑敏感区隧道破除抗滑桩进洞转换体系设计与施工方案优选[J]  现代隧道技术, 2023,V60(6): 220-227
YANG Chunshan1 YANG Xueqiang2 WANG Yatian2 LIN Yonggui1 .Optimization of the Design and Construction Scheme of Tunnel Entry and Conver? sion System for Removal of Anti-slide Pile in Architecturally Sensitive Area[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 220-227
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2023/V60/I6/220
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 冯冀蒙1,2 宋佳黛1,2 王圣涛3 李艺飞1,2 张俊儒1,2 王好明4 汪 波1,2.填海地层特大断面隧道超长管棚变形控制 效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[2] 熊 颖1,2 张俊儒1,2 范子焱1,2 陈佳豪1,2 马荐驰1,2 陈鹏涛1,2 谭瑞锋3,4.层状软岩中爆破应力波传播与振动衰减特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[3] 罗志洋1 张春瑜2,3 王立川1,2,4,5 徐 烁1 李利平4 王倩倩5 刘志强6.TBM裂隙岩体隧洞涌水机制及注浆堵水研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[4] 周弋力1 封 坤1 郭文琦1 张亮亮2 李春林3.超大直径盾构隧道管片纵缝抗弯力学行为与损伤过程研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[5] 易 丹1 薛皓匀2 杨绍毅2 喻 波1 封 坤2 林 刚1.盾构隧道管片结构螺栓失效对横向地震响应的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 174-181
[6] 贾永刚1 郝子晗1 鲁卫东1 吴 帆1 阳卫卫2.钢纤维混凝土管片不同接头型式力学性能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 182-196
[7] 罗 龙1 朱开宬2 韩瑀萱3 蔡 东4 刘哲奇5 王 俊6.超大断面隧道施工工法优化研究 ——以天邛高速公路梨花山隧道工程为例[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 273-282
[8] 葛正辉1 郑建国1 李新志2 陈 鹏3 宁志玮2 王鹏程2.不同形式拱架初期支护变形规律实测与数值研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[9] 胡云进1,,2,3 朱铭伟1,2,3 郜会彩1,2,3 任智豪1,2,3.地下水渗流对能源盾构隧道换热性能的影响[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 50-59
[10] 李玉华1 高亚伟1 钟秋锋1 秦丽绚2 李俊杰2 程志明2 黄永辉2.不同掏槽孔角度下隧道楔形掏槽爆破效果研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 108-116
[11] 李瀚源1,2 冯 劲1 郭洪雨1 谢雄耀2 周红升1 孙 飞1.海底盾构隧道双层衬砌结构联合承载力学特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 126-138
[12] 苏 恒1 王士民1 朱旭红2 秦善良3.考虑空间效应的盾构刀具切削桩基主筋力学特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 139-150
[13] 王帅帅1 傅一帆2,3 徐 勇1 史经峰1 郭 春2,3.通过接力风机进行风量分配的隧道施工风仓式通风参数研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 240-248
[14] 李 敬1 罗禄森1 张柏林2 胡浩然2.辅助隧道封闭后隧道内瓦斯运移富集规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 201-211
[15] 郭 盈 彭文庆 陈世强 张 琼 王佳伟.隧道行车道通风模型试验当量长度计算方法与验证[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 230-240
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术