[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (2) :172-181    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
上软下硬地层大直径土压平衡盾构下穿民房建筑群沉降控制
(1.中铁建华南建设有限公司,广州 511458;2.中铁十八局集团有限公司,天津 300222)
On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata
(1. China Railway Construction South China Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458; 2. China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd.,Tianjin 300222)
Download: PDF (5671KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 依托广州地铁18号线盾构施工,针对其地层分布复杂、软硬差异大及穿越密集民房建筑群等特点,通过注浆加固、现场动态监测、优化掘进参数等一系列主动措施,解决实际工程中掘进参数合理取值与地表建筑沉降变形控制两大难题。研究结果表明:(1)在该类软硬地层中掘进时,刀盘在通过不同岩层断面分界线时扭矩、推力等参数波动较大,总推力与扭矩有良好的相关性,各掘进参数宜控制为:推力30 000~35 000 kN、扭矩4 500~6 000 kN·m、推进速度35~45 mm/min;(2)提出的多段式封孔洞内超前注浆工艺可使刀盘前18 m范围内的地表上抬3~5 mm,最大上抬值能达9.02 mm,同时能缓解土体在盾构下穿时及后续固结稳定的沉降趋势;(3)因刀具磨损、掘进参数波动大、螺旋机卡死等引起的临时停机会造成地表建筑日沉降速率超过3 mm/d,在预设停机点位置前采取洞内超前注浆和克泥效工法能有效缓解沉降趋势,在带压开舱期间日沉降速率控制在2 mm/d以下;(4)左右隧道轴线附近的地表建筑沉降基本可分为“微小隆起—沉降较大—逐渐稳定”三个阶段,测点最大沉降值最终稳定在-21.38 mm、-22.49 mm,均小于控制值。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
章邦超 1 刘洪亮 2 雷锋国 2 彭光火 2
关键词上软下硬地层   土压平衡盾构   密集建筑群   掘进参数   洞内超前注浆   沉降控制     
Abstract: The shield tunnelling of Guangzhou Metro Line 18 is faced to such characteristics as complex ground dis? tribution, large strength differences between soft and hard rocks, and dense residential building complex located above the tunnel. In view of this, it is intended to address two major problems in actual construction, i.e. settling the reasonable tunnelling parameters and controlling the settlement deformation of buildings on the ground surface through a series of active measures, such as grouting reinforcement, on-site dynamic monitoring, and optimization of tunnelling parameters. The results show that: (1) in this type of soft and hard rock interbedded strata, tunnelling parameters (such as torque and thrust) would fluctuate greatly when the cutterhead passes through the geological boundary of different strata, and the total thrust would be in a fine correlation with the torque, where it is appropriate to control the tunnelling parameters at certain values, i.e. the thrust at 30 000~35 000 kN, the torque at 4 500~6 000kN·m, and the advancing speed at 35~45 mm/min; (2) the proposed technological process of multi-section sealing and advanced grouting in the tunnel can lift the ground surface by 3~5 mm within the scope of 18 m in front of the cutterhead, with maximum lifting value of 9.02 mm, while it can also mitigate the settlement tendency of the soil mass induced by shield driving and subsequent consolidation and stabilization; (3) temporary shield stoppage caused by tool wear, large fluctuation in tunnelling parameters, and the jamming of the screw conveyor can cause the daily settlement rate of the buildings on the surface to exceed 3 mm/d. The adoption of advanced grouting in tunnel and the clay shock method ahead of the preset machine stop point can effectively alleviate the settlement tendency and control the daily settlement rate below 2 mm/d during the hyperbaric intervention of the earth chamber; (4) the settlement of the surface buildings near the left and right tunnel axes can be basically divided into three phases of slight heave—large settlement—gradual stabilization, with maximum settlement of -21.38 mm and -22.49 mm respectivly, being less than the control values.
KeywordsUpper-soft and lower-hard strata,   Earth pressure balance shield,   Dense building complex,   Tunnelling parameter,   Advanced grouting in tunnel,   Settlement control     
作者简介: 章邦超(1982-),男,高级工程师,主要从事城市轨道交通技术管理工作,E-mail:154151053@qq.com.
引用本文:   
章邦超 1 刘洪亮 2 雷锋国 2 彭光火 2 .上软下硬地层大直径土压平衡盾构下穿民房建筑群沉降控制[J]  现代隧道技术, 2022,V59(2): 172-181
ZHANG Bangchao1 LIU Hongliang2 LEI Fengguo2 PENG Guanghuo2 .On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(2): 172-181
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2022/V59/I2/172
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 徐公允 1 徐汪豪 1,2 姚志刚 1 方 勇 1 刘四进 3.基于三维RBD-DEM耦合方法的贯入角度对滚刀冲击影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(6): 77-84
[2] 王英学 1 骆 阳 1 张子为 1 王国义 2 宋相帅 1.圆弧刀盘土压平衡盾构施工沉降影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(6): 155-162
[3] 宋 洋 1 王韦颐 2 杜春生 3.富水圆砾与泥岩复合地层泥水盾构超近接下穿既有地铁隧道掘进参数优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(5): 85-95
[4] 陈 焱 1 王宇皓 1 方 勇 1 徐公允 1 周凯歌 1 刘四进 2.砂性地层土压平衡盾构切刀磨损室内试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(5): 159-166
[5] 王磊磊 1 殷丽君 1 龚秋明 1 李 瑞 2 吴 帆 1 班 超 1.石家庄砂土地层土压平衡盾构渣土改良试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(3): 182-189
[6] 张 迅 1 贺雄飞 2,3.泡沫剂对土压平衡盾构主要掘进参数的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(3): 176-181
[7] 张自光 1,2 曹广勇 1,2 李建立 3 翟朝娇 1,.上软下硬地层地铁隧道安全覆岩厚度研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 71-77
[8] 杨继华 1 郭卫新 1 闫长斌 2 苗 栋 1.基于掘进能耗的TBM掘进参数优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(1): 54-60
[9] 王军祥 1 徐晨晖 1 董建华 2 陈四利 1 寇海军 3 王 鑫 1.富水地层盾构管廊工程岩土体参数反演与掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(1): 117-126
[10] 刘 辉 1 李彦青 2.上软下硬浅覆土条件下土压平衡盾构下穿密集建筑群施工技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(6): 186-192
[11] 龚琛杰 1 阳军生 1 傅金阳 1, 2.复合岩层大直径越江盾构隧道管片施工裂损特征及影响因素分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[12] 张 新.基于随机源模型的新型微动探测技术在上软下硬地层盾构隧道中的应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 43-50
[13] 李 港 1 李晓军 1 杨文翔 2 韩 冬 1.基于深度学习的TBM掘进参数预测研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 154-159
[14] 沈 翔 1 袁大军 2 吴 俊 3 付艳斌 1.复杂地层条件下盾构掘进参数分析及预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 160-166
[15] 姚晓明 1 舒 波 2 李 波 1.新建盾构隧道近距离下穿既有地铁线的安全控制技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 243-
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术