[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :108-118    DOI:
数值分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
多级让压支护体系在软岩大变形公路隧道中的应用研究
(1.西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031; 2.浙江公路水运工程咨询集团有限公司,杭州 310000)
Study on Application of Multi-level Yielding Support System in a Highway Tunnel in Soft Rock with Large Deformation
(1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2. Zhejiang Highway and Water Transport Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000)
Download: PDF (9273KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 基于让压支护技术理念,依托杜家山隧道工程,探讨多级让压不同让压点和让压量组合下围岩及支护结构响应变化规律,并对比多级让压支护与一级让压支护在各自最优让压点和让压量下的支护效果。结果表明,采用二级让压时,当让压点和总让压量一致,随着一级让压量减小,二级让压量增大,围岩的水平位移、拱顶沉降、最小主应力和塑性区均呈现先减小后增大趋势;当让压量保持一致,一级让压点增大,二级让压点逐渐减小,拱顶沉降、边墙水平收敛位移和围岩塑性区均先增加后减小,但变化幅度较小,围岩最小主应力值呈先减小后增大态势,因此围岩释放的形变能先增大后减小。当挤压型大变形隧道采用二级让压模式,让压量分阶段进行释放时,围岩释放形变能减少,支护结构能较好控制围岩变形,围岩进行充分应力重分布,二级让压围岩—结构受力变形相比一级让压更为均衡。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张子洋1 汪 波1 刘金炜1 宁其冉1 王 杰2 喻 炜1
关键词软弱围岩   多级让压支护   让压点   让压量     
Abstract: By using the technical concept of yielding support and using the Dujiashan Tunnel Project as an example, this paper is intended to investigate the response variation pattern of surrounding rock and support structure under different combinations of yielding point and yielding quantity of multi-level yielding support. Also the supporting effects of multi-level yielding support and one-level yielding support under their optimum yielding point and yielding quantity are compared. As the results indicate: If two-level yielding support is used and the yielding point and total yielding quantity remain unchanged, then as the first-level yielding quantity decreases, the secondary-level yielding quantity increases, and the horizontal displacement of surrounding rock, crown settlement, minimum principal stress and plastic zone all decrease before increasing. If the yielding quantity remains unchanged and the first-level yielding point increases, then the secondary yielding point gradually decreases, and the crown settlement, side wall horizontal convergent displacement and surrounding rock plastic zone all increase before decreasing, but with minor margin of variation. The minimum principal stress of surrounding rock decreases before increasing, so the deformation energy released by the surrounding rock increases before decreasing. If a tunnel with large squeezing deformation is built with the two-level yielding support and the yielding quantity is released stage by stage, then the deformation energy released by the surrounding rock decreases. The support structure can effectively control the surrounding rock deformation. Stress redistribution of surrounding rock is adequately achieved. The stress and deformation of surrounding rock-structure under two-level yielding support system is more balanced than under one-level yielding support system.
KeywordsWeak surrounding rock,   Multi-level yielding support,   Yielding point,   Yielding quantity     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(U2034205).
作者简介: 张子洋(2000-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究工作,E-mail: zhang_zy320@163.com. 通讯作者:汪 波(1975-),男,博士,教授,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究工作,E-mail: ahbowang@163.com.
引用本文:   
张子洋1 汪 波1 刘金炜1 宁其冉1 王 杰2 喻 炜1 .多级让压支护体系在软岩大变形公路隧道中的应用研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(3): 108-118
ZHANG Ziyang1 WANG Bo1 LIU Jinwei1 NING Qiran1 WANG Jie2 YU Wei1 .Study on Application of Multi-level Yielding Support System in a Highway Tunnel in Soft Rock with Large Deformation[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 108-118
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I3/108
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 王建宇.“对抗”还是“屈让”?——围岩挤压性大变形处治的基本理念[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 1-7
[2] 王 冠.严重挤压性围岩隧道平行导洞双层支护作用机理研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 138-146
[3] 陶玉敬 1 袁传保 1 王茂靖 1 宋 章 1 刘国强 2.成兰铁路跃龙门隧道深埋越岭段大变形原因分析研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 229-236
[4] 王修领.软弱隧道围岩与结构协同作用特征模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 164-174
[5] 刘国强.跃龙门隧道软岩大变形两台阶快速成环法施工技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 252-258
[6] 程 刚 1 王 俊 2.流变荷载作用下隧道二次衬砌损伤行为研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(3): 123-129
[7] 吕敬富 1 杜江梅 1 罗泽军 2,3 张金江 1 缪亚彪 1.岩口公路隧道高陡边坡稳定性及支护参数研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 116-124
[8] 王建宇.对形变压力的认识——隧道围岩挤压性变形问题探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(4): 1-11
[9] 杜 俊 1,2 梅志荣 2 傅立磊 3 陈永照 3.基于强度折减法的浅埋软弱围岩隧道掌子面稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 51-57
[10] 王道远 1, 2,3 袁金秀 1 王记平 1 王 凯 4 夏 勇 4 王海蛟 4 温 明 4.考虑施工过程的浅埋软弱隧道管棚变形预测及参数敏感性分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(1): 79-86
[11] 陈志敏 1,2 余云燕 1,2 李国良 3 赵德安 4.基于原岩应力的关角隧道变形潜势研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(4): 33-41
[12] 王智超 1, 2 周 黎 1 张学兵 1 沈明燕 3.隧道软弱围岩变形时效性表征及影响因素分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(4): 146-154
[13] 王道远 1,2 袁金秀 1 王记平 1 程 园 3 王 凯 4 夏 勇 4 王海蛟 4.浅埋软弱围岩隧道快速进洞方法及
稳定性控制技术研究
[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(4): 178-185
[14] 任育珍 杜 俊 张伦华 毛 宁 吴 涌.浅埋软弱围岩隧道变形特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(2): 84-90
[15] 杜林林 王秀英 刘维宁.基于收敛-约束法的预衬砌支护适用性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017,54(4): 115-122
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术