Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :41-47    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Risk Evaluation System for the Impacts of a Concealed Karst Cave on Tunnel Construction
(1 Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092;2 Department of Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering Tongji University, Shanghai 200092; 3 CCCC Rail Transit Consultants Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430056; 4 Anhui Comprehensive Transportation Research Institute Co. Ltd., Hefei 230000)
Download: PDF (1177KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Concealed karst caves, a major hidden danger in the construction of tunnels in karst regions, are in? clined to cause serious accidents such as water bursts and mud gushing, collapse and subsidence. Few systematic studies have been carried out concerning karst cave related risk identification and warning theories. Based on case statistics and theoretical analysis, geotechnical and construction risk factors were selected for studied. The geotechnical factors include the orientation of a karst cave relative to a tunnel, the type and filling condition of the karst cave, the interval between the cave and the tunnel, the grades of the surrounding rocks and the karst cave scale. The construction factors include advanced geological forecast and construction monitoring. Considering the relationship between risk factors and construction accidents regarding karst tunnels, the constant weights of various risk factors were calculated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In light of different karst tunnels, the weights of risk factors were calculated by variable weight theory based on constant weight. Considering the evolution rules of karst tunnel safety accidents, the valuing scope of risk factors was determined, and grading standards for the risk evaluation of concealed karst caves were presented. The feasibility and rationality of the evaluation system were verified through practical cases.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsKarst tunnel   Concealed karst cave   Risk factor   Weight   Risk evaluation     
Abstract: Concealed karst caves, a major hidden danger in the construction of tunnels in karst regions, are in? clined to cause serious accidents such as water bursts and mud gushing, collapse and subsidence. Few systematic studies have been carried out concerning karst cave related risk identification and warning theories. Based on case statistics and theoretical analysis, geotechnical and construction risk factors were selected for studied. The geotechnical factors include the orientation of a karst cave relative to a tunnel, the type and filling condition of the karst cave, the interval between the cave and the tunnel, the grades of the surrounding rocks and the karst cave scale. The construction factors include advanced geological forecast and construction monitoring. Considering the relationship between risk factors and construction accidents regarding karst tunnels, the constant weights of various risk factors were calculated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In light of different karst tunnels, the weights of risk factors were calculated by variable weight theory based on constant weight. Considering the evolution rules of karst tunnel safety accidents, the valuing scope of risk factors was determined, and grading standards for the risk evaluation of concealed karst caves were presented. The feasibility and rationality of the evaluation system were verified through practical cases.
KeywordsKarst tunnel,   Concealed karst cave,   Risk factor,   Weight,   Risk evaluation     
Cite this article:   
.Risk Evaluation System for the Impacts of a Concealed Karst Cave on Tunnel Construction[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 41-47
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/41
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY