Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :41-47    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Risk Evaluation System for the Impacts of a Concealed Karst Cave on Tunnel Construction
(1 Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092;2 Department of Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering Tongji University, Shanghai 200092; 3 CCCC Rail Transit Consultants Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430056; 4 Anhui Comprehensive Transportation Research Institute Co. Ltd., Hefei 230000)
Download: PDF (1177KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Concealed karst caves, a major hidden danger in the construction of tunnels in karst regions, are in? clined to cause serious accidents such as water bursts and mud gushing, collapse and subsidence. Few systematic studies have been carried out concerning karst cave related risk identification and warning theories. Based on case statistics and theoretical analysis, geotechnical and construction risk factors were selected for studied. The geotechnical factors include the orientation of a karst cave relative to a tunnel, the type and filling condition of the karst cave, the interval between the cave and the tunnel, the grades of the surrounding rocks and the karst cave scale. The construction factors include advanced geological forecast and construction monitoring. Considering the relationship between risk factors and construction accidents regarding karst tunnels, the constant weights of various risk factors were calculated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In light of different karst tunnels, the weights of risk factors were calculated by variable weight theory based on constant weight. Considering the evolution rules of karst tunnel safety accidents, the valuing scope of risk factors was determined, and grading standards for the risk evaluation of concealed karst caves were presented. The feasibility and rationality of the evaluation system were verified through practical cases.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsKarst tunnel   Concealed karst cave   Risk factor   Weight   Risk evaluation     
Abstract: Concealed karst caves, a major hidden danger in the construction of tunnels in karst regions, are in? clined to cause serious accidents such as water bursts and mud gushing, collapse and subsidence. Few systematic studies have been carried out concerning karst cave related risk identification and warning theories. Based on case statistics and theoretical analysis, geotechnical and construction risk factors were selected for studied. The geotechnical factors include the orientation of a karst cave relative to a tunnel, the type and filling condition of the karst cave, the interval between the cave and the tunnel, the grades of the surrounding rocks and the karst cave scale. The construction factors include advanced geological forecast and construction monitoring. Considering the relationship between risk factors and construction accidents regarding karst tunnels, the constant weights of various risk factors were calculated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In light of different karst tunnels, the weights of risk factors were calculated by variable weight theory based on constant weight. Considering the evolution rules of karst tunnel safety accidents, the valuing scope of risk factors was determined, and grading standards for the risk evaluation of concealed karst caves were presented. The feasibility and rationality of the evaluation system were verified through practical cases.
KeywordsKarst tunnel,   Concealed karst cave,   Risk factor,   Weight,   Risk evaluation     
Cite this article:   
.Risk Evaluation System for the Impacts of a Concealed Karst Cave on Tunnel Construction[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 41-47
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/41
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY