Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (1) :69-79    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Intelligent Degree of the Mining Face Based on Grey Relational Analysis
(1. Intelligent Unmanned Mining Institute, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Beijing 101601; 2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Intelligent Mining Technology, Beijing 101601; 3. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Under-ground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083; 4. China Coal Research In-stitute, Beijing 100013; 5. College of Safety Engineering, North China Institute of Science & Technology, Beijing 101601; 6. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083)
Download: PDF (1878KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to further evaluate the intelligent degree of the coal mining face scientifically and reasonably, this paper constructs a gray relational analysis based comprehensive evaluation model for the intelligent degree of mining face by deeply analyzing the influencing factors on the intelligent degree of mining face, such as surrounding rock detection, mining equipment, production system, supporting production system, organization and management,etc. By quantifying and scoring factors affecting the intelligence degree of mining face, using the hierarchical analysis method to obtain the weights and determine the correlations, the intelligence degrees of mining face are classified into four levels: excellent, good, medium and poor. Using the comprehensive evaluation model to empirically verify the 802 working face of Shaanxi Huangling Mining Co., Ltd., the calculated correlation is 0.765 8, which indicates that the intelligent degree of 802 working face is excellent according to the rating criteria, and it is consistent with the actual situation. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation model based on gray relational analysis can accurately and objectively evaluate the intelligent degree of the mining face.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Kexue1
2
3
4
5
6 YANG Haijiang1
2
5 HE Manchao3 SUN Jiandong1
2
5 LI Dong1
2
5 CHENG Zhiheng1
2
5
KeywordsCoal mine   Intelligent mining face   Gray relational analysis   Evaluation   Hierarchical analysis method     
Abstract: In order to further evaluate the intelligent degree of the coal mining face scientifically and reasonably, this paper constructs a gray relational analysis based comprehensive evaluation model for the intelligent degree of mining face by deeply analyzing the influencing factors on the intelligent degree of mining face, such as surrounding rock detection, mining equipment, production system, supporting production system, organization and management,etc. By quantifying and scoring factors affecting the intelligence degree of mining face, using the hierarchical analysis method to obtain the weights and determine the correlations, the intelligence degrees of mining face are classified into four levels: excellent, good, medium and poor. Using the comprehensive evaluation model to empirically verify the 802 working face of Shaanxi Huangling Mining Co., Ltd., the calculated correlation is 0.765 8, which indicates that the intelligent degree of 802 working face is excellent according to the rating criteria, and it is consistent with the actual situation. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation model based on gray relational analysis can accurately and objectively evaluate the intelligent degree of the mining face.
KeywordsCoal mine,   Intelligent mining face,   Gray relational analysis,   Evaluation,   Hierarchical analysis method     
Received: 2021-08-04;
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Kexue1, 2, 3 etc .Comprehensive Evaluation of the Intelligent Degree of the Mining Face Based on Grey Relational Analysis[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(1): 69-79
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I1/69
 
No references of article
[1] WEN Jingzhou1 LI Youhe1 YANG Xinze1 WU Gang1 YU Yangshou2 WANG Zhiliang2.Safety Evaluation of Tunnel Lining Reinforced with Steel Strips under Coupled Multiple Defects[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 291-300
[2] LI Qiang1 HAN Xingbo2 XIE Ju1 LI Chao3 LI Xing3 MA Aihua1 BI Jiefu3 YE Fei.Tunnel Energy Supply Strategy and Practice with Grid-Connected PV-Storage Microgrid: A Case Study of the Wudingguan Tunnel Photovoltaic Power Station Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 60-66
[3] ZHANG Yina1 CHEN Lei2,3 HOU Ge2 ZHI Baoping1 LIU He2.Structural Health Assessment of TBM Water Diversion Tunnels Based on the AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theoretical Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 240-250
[4] LIU Liying1 YANG Chunshan1 YU Zhiyuan2 OU Zhenfeng1.Mechanical Response and Resilence Evolution Characteristics of Tunnel Structures under Additional Loads[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 167-173
[5] CHEN Xiangsheng 1,2,3 CHEN Kunyang1,2,3 QIU Tong1,2,3 WANG Lei 1,2,3 HE Qiufeng1,2,3 LAI Yani1,2,3CHEN Wuxiong4 FU Yanbin1,2,3.Review of Research on Embodied Carbon Emissions in Urban Rail Transit Infrastructure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 1-13
[6] LIANG Bo1NIU Jia'an1 QIN Can1 HE Shiyong2 RAN Yifeng3 ZHU Shuangkai?.Information Perception Mechanism and Evaluation Method of Highway Tunnel Lighting Environment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 14-27
[7] LI Jiahao1 XI Mingxing2 SHEN Yi1 LIU An2 ZHU Hehua1.Calculation and Composition Assessment of the Carbon Emission in the Construction Phase of Highway Tunnels Based on SimaPro[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 20-28
[8] ZENG Hongrui1,2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[9] ZHANG Junwei1,2 GAO Xia1 WANG Haoquan1.Adaptability Evaluation on Gas Drainage of Tunnels in Non-Coal Measure Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 20-29
[10] YUAN Hongyun1,2 CHEN Liwei2 LIU Zhiqiang2.Method for Comprehensive Evaluation of Longitudinal Crack Defect of Lining of Single-track Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 208-216
[11] ZHANG Kexue1,2,3,4,5,6 WU Yongwei1,3,6 HE Manchao2 CHEN Xuexi1,3,6 JIANG Yaodong4 LI Dong1,3,6.Research on the Intelligent Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal Seam Impact Risk Based on the BP Neural Network Optimized by the Bat Algorithm[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 38-46
[12] GUO Chun1,2 GUO Yalin1,2 CHEN Zheng1,2.Carbon Emission Accounting and Research Progress Analysis of Traffic Tunnel Engineering[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 1-10
[13] ZHAO Aijun1 WEI Yanqing2 HUANG Taiping1.Study on the Decision-making System for the Selection of Highway Tunnel Face Layout Type Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 61-69
[14] DUAN Lian1 LI Yongheng2 WU Jianghang1.Stability Evaluation for the Lining Structures of Tunnels with Large Corrosion Areas in Sulfate Environment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 212-220
[15] YE Fei1 ZHANG Xingbing1 SU Enjie1 WEN Xiaobao1 XIA Tianhan1 WEI Yanchun2.Sidewall Decoration for Highway Tunnels Based on Driving Comfort[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 196-203
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY