Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :29-39    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063)
Download: PDF (4811KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to build the algorithm model for carbon emission prediction during railway tunnel construction, a study has been conducted based on a railway tunnel project. First, the carbon emission during construction of the tunnel and the proportion of each subphase in the total emission are quantitatively determined by using the carbon emission calculation system. Then several different prediction models are created by using several machine learning algorithms, the parameters of the prediction models are optimized by using the animal optimization algorithm, the fitting results are compared and analyzed by using the assessment indicators including R2, MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE and SMAPE so as to select the optimum prediction model, and the importance degree of each parametric variable is determined by using the SHAP value. The results are stated as follows: The construction materials production stage has the greatest contribution to carbon emission in tunnel construction and the construction materials transportation stage has the least contribution; BP neural network generates better regression results than the algorithms such as random forest, LightGBM, SVR and extreme learning machine, and according to comparison of the regression prediction models optimized by the PSO, WOA and SSA algorithms, WOA-BP algorithm generates the best fitting results;based on the analysis by the SHAP algorithm, the rank of the parametric variables in terms of importance degree is as follows: excavation area > surrounding rock class > excavation method > buried depth.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZENG Hongrui1
2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1
2 GUO Chun1
2
KeywordsRailway tunnels   Construction carbon emission   Machine learning   Regression prediction   Importance assessment     
Abstract: In order to build the algorithm model for carbon emission prediction during railway tunnel construction, a study has been conducted based on a railway tunnel project. First, the carbon emission during construction of the tunnel and the proportion of each subphase in the total emission are quantitatively determined by using the carbon emission calculation system. Then several different prediction models are created by using several machine learning algorithms, the parameters of the prediction models are optimized by using the animal optimization algorithm, the fitting results are compared and analyzed by using the assessment indicators including R2, MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE and SMAPE so as to select the optimum prediction model, and the importance degree of each parametric variable is determined by using the SHAP value. The results are stated as follows: The construction materials production stage has the greatest contribution to carbon emission in tunnel construction and the construction materials transportation stage has the least contribution; BP neural network generates better regression results than the algorithms such as random forest, LightGBM, SVR and extreme learning machine, and according to comparison of the regression prediction models optimized by the PSO, WOA and SSA algorithms, WOA-BP algorithm generates the best fitting results;based on the analysis by the SHAP algorithm, the rank of the parametric variables in terms of importance degree is as follows: excavation area > surrounding rock class > excavation method > buried depth.
KeywordsRailway tunnels,   Construction carbon emission,   Machine learning,   Regression prediction,   Importance assessment     
Cite this article:   
ZENG Hongrui1, 2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1, 2 GUO Chun1 etc .Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 29-39
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I6/29
 
No references of article
[1] ZHU Xingyu LIU Zheng ZHANG Zhiqiang FENG Ying.Study on the Influence Law of Structural Design Parameters of the Railway Tunnel on Secondary Lining Cracks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 1-10
[2] CHEN Wei1,2 ZHANG Minghong2 ZHANG Ying2 LIN Ling2.Study on Engineering Geological Characteristics of Saline Rock in a Tunnel on China-Laos Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 234-242
[3] DUO Shengjun.Study on Ventilation Technology for Long-distance TBM Construction in Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 222-228
[4] ZHAO Wanqiang1 LU Junfu2 TANG Yin1 ZHENG Changqing1.Study on Risk Level Classification Method and Control Measures for Railway Tunnel Floor Heave[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 178-187
[5] CHEN Xiwu1 QING Weichen1 LIU Guoqiang2.Construction Design for Super-large Section Tunnels in Fault Zone with High Geotress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 204-212
[6] YUAN Chuanbao1 LU Jinlin1 TAO Yujing1 SONG Zhang1 LIU Guoqiang2.Study on Major Engineering Geological Problems of Yuelongmen Tunnel in Mountain Areas Under Complex Strong Earthquake Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 188-195
[7] YUAN Hongyun1,2 CHEN Liwei2 LIU Zhiqiang2.Method for Comprehensive Evaluation of Longitudinal Crack Defect of Lining of Single-track Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 208-216
[8] LU Junfu1 ZHANG Hongxin1 PEI Qifan2.Classification Method of Monitoring Level in Railway Tunnel Construction Phase and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 202-208
[9] ZHANG Minqing1 XIN Weike1 JIA Dapeng1 SI Jingzhao2 WANG Huanlong3.Study and Application of Key Technical Parameters of Pre-grouting in High-pressure Water-rich Deep Shaft Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 177-186
[10] DUAN Lian1 LI Yongheng2 WU Jianghang1.Stability Evaluation for the Lining Structures of Tunnels with Large Corrosion Areas in Sulfate Environment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 212-220
[11] ZHOU Xiaojun1 NING Yuansi2 YANG Changyu3.Design and Engineering Application of Prefabricated Structure for Secondary Lining Arch of Double-Track Railway Tunnels Constructed by the Mining Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 204-217
[12] LI Weilin1 ZHANG Guang1 ZHU Yingwei1 HU Shaohua1,2.A 3D Numerical Simulation Study on the Ventilation of T-Shaped Tunnels with Different Bifurcation Angles during Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 158-166
[13] WANG Mingnian1,2 GUO Xiaohan1,2 NI Guangbin3 YU Li1,2 LI Chunhui1,2.A Discussion on the Control Standards for Smoke CO Concentration during Fires in High-altitude Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 40-45
[14] YAO Jie1,2.Analysis on Factors Influencing the Pneumatic Load during Train Operation in High-speed Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 166-171
[15] HENG Aichen1,2 ZHAO Haoran1,2 TAN Bingxin1,2 HUANG Feng1,2 HE Zhaoyi1.Radar Image Recognition of Tunnel Lining Cavity Fillings Based on SVM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 45-52
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY