Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :29-39    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063)
Download: PDF (4811KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to build the algorithm model for carbon emission prediction during railway tunnel construction, a study has been conducted based on a railway tunnel project. First, the carbon emission during construction of the tunnel and the proportion of each subphase in the total emission are quantitatively determined by using the carbon emission calculation system. Then several different prediction models are created by using several machine learning algorithms, the parameters of the prediction models are optimized by using the animal optimization algorithm, the fitting results are compared and analyzed by using the assessment indicators including R2, MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE and SMAPE so as to select the optimum prediction model, and the importance degree of each parametric variable is determined by using the SHAP value. The results are stated as follows: The construction materials production stage has the greatest contribution to carbon emission in tunnel construction and the construction materials transportation stage has the least contribution; BP neural network generates better regression results than the algorithms such as random forest, LightGBM, SVR and extreme learning machine, and according to comparison of the regression prediction models optimized by the PSO, WOA and SSA algorithms, WOA-BP algorithm generates the best fitting results;based on the analysis by the SHAP algorithm, the rank of the parametric variables in terms of importance degree is as follows: excavation area > surrounding rock class > excavation method > buried depth.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZENG Hongrui1
2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1
2 GUO Chun1
2
KeywordsRailway tunnels   Construction carbon emission   Machine learning   Regression prediction   Importance assessment     
Abstract: In order to build the algorithm model for carbon emission prediction during railway tunnel construction, a study has been conducted based on a railway tunnel project. First, the carbon emission during construction of the tunnel and the proportion of each subphase in the total emission are quantitatively determined by using the carbon emission calculation system. Then several different prediction models are created by using several machine learning algorithms, the parameters of the prediction models are optimized by using the animal optimization algorithm, the fitting results are compared and analyzed by using the assessment indicators including R2, MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE and SMAPE so as to select the optimum prediction model, and the importance degree of each parametric variable is determined by using the SHAP value. The results are stated as follows: The construction materials production stage has the greatest contribution to carbon emission in tunnel construction and the construction materials transportation stage has the least contribution; BP neural network generates better regression results than the algorithms such as random forest, LightGBM, SVR and extreme learning machine, and according to comparison of the regression prediction models optimized by the PSO, WOA and SSA algorithms, WOA-BP algorithm generates the best fitting results;based on the analysis by the SHAP algorithm, the rank of the parametric variables in terms of importance degree is as follows: excavation area > surrounding rock class > excavation method > buried depth.
KeywordsRailway tunnels,   Construction carbon emission,   Machine learning,   Regression prediction,   Importance assessment     
Cite this article:   
ZENG Hongrui1, 2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1, 2 GUO Chun1 etc .Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 29-39
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I6/29
 
No references of article
[1] ZHANG Huan1, 2 ZHANG Shishu3 LI Tianbin1, 2 YANG Gang1, 2 LI Shisen1, 2 XIAO Huabo3 CHEN Weidong3.GAPSO-LightGBM-based Intelligent Prediction Method of Surrounding Rock Grade in TBM Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 98-109
[2] ZENG Shiqi1,2 CHEN Xiangsheng1,2,3,4 TAN Yijun1,2 LIU Pingwei2 SU Dong1,2,3,4.Research on the Inversion Model of the Ground Load on Ultra-large Diameter Shield Tunnels Based on TL-GA-BP Algorithm[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 110-120
[3] KUANG Liang1 SU Wei1 TAO Weiming1 TIAN Siming2 SHEN Yusheng3 LI Xu2 WANG Huiwu1.Study on the Impact Zoning and Fortification Range of Tunnel Structures Crossing Strike-slip Faults[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 45-54
[4] GAO Fuzhong.Prediction of Blasting Vibration Parameters in Urban Tunnels Based on Feature Dimensionality Reduction and Deep Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 100-110
[5] WEI Ronghua1,2 ZHANG Kangjian1,2 ZHANG Zhiqiang1,2.Optimization Study of Waterproof and Drainage Technology Parameters for Deep-buried Ditches in Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 183-192
[6] SONG Yuepeng1 FAN Xiaofeng2 LIANG Yu2,3,4 PENG Hongguo5 ZHANG Hanwei5.Deformation Monitoring and Analysis during the Excavation of Deep Circular Shafts in Intercity Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 219-226
[7] ZHOU Xiaojun.On Segmenting Design Method of Prefabricated Assembled Secondary Lining for High-speed Railway Tunnels Based on Cross-section Geometric Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 232-243
[8] GAO Shuquan1,2,3 JIANG Liangwen1,2,3 MOU Yuancun1,2,3 LI Xing1,2,3 WANG Shudong1,2 ZHAO Siwei1,2,3.Advanced Geological Forecasting Techniques for Railway Tunnels in the Complex and Treacherous Mountainous Areas of Southwest China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 52-59
[9] WANG Mingnian1,2 DENG Tao3 YU Li1,2.Development and Prospects of Operation and Disaster Prevention Ventilation Technology in China′s Traffic Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 152-166
[10] ZHU Xingyu LIU Zheng ZHANG Zhiqiang FENG Ying.Study on the Influence Law of Structural Design Parameters of the Railway Tunnel on Secondary Lining Cracks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 1-10
[11] CHEN Wei1,2 ZHANG Minghong2 ZHANG Ying2 LIN Ling2.Study on Engineering Geological Characteristics of Saline Rock in a Tunnel on China-Laos Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 234-242
[12] DUO Shengjun.Study on Ventilation Technology for Long-distance TBM Construction in Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 222-228
[13] ZHAO Wanqiang1 LU Junfu2 TANG Yin1 ZHENG Changqing1.Study on Risk Level Classification Method and Control Measures for Railway Tunnel Floor Heave[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 178-187
[14] CHEN Xiwu1 QING Weichen1 LIU Guoqiang2.Construction Design for Super-large Section Tunnels in Fault Zone with High Geotress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 204-212
[15] YUAN Chuanbao1 LU Jinlin1 TAO Yujing1 SONG Zhang1 LIU Guoqiang2.Study on Major Engineering Geological Problems of Yuelongmen Tunnel in Mountain Areas Under Complex Strong Earthquake Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 188-195
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY