Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (1) :202-208    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Classification Method of Monitoring Level in Railway Tunnel Construction Phase and Its Application
(1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster Prevention and Geological Environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059; 2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (1161KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The instrumentation and monitoring in the construction phase of railway tunnels is an important means to ensure the informatization construction. At present, the instrumentation and monitoring items and contents of the tunnel are mainly determined by the qualitative determination of the surrounding rock level. No unified quantitative evaluation system has been established. Based on the risk analysis theory and the risk probability index & risk consequence index faced by tunnel, the monitoring level and classification method of railway tunnel construction phase are established. We take the unascertained measurement theory as the risk probability index evaluation method, select eight impact indexes, such as rock weathering degree, rock quality index and uniaxial saturated compressive strength, and construct the index measurement function. Also, we combine the improved analytic hierarchy process to weight each evaluation index, determine the risk probability index according to the confidence identification criteria, and calculate the monitoring level index quantitatively to determine the monitoring level and corresponding monitoring content. Taking Xiaocaoba Tunnel of Chongqing-Kunming Railway as an example, the monitoring level of the three mileage sections of the tunnel during construction phase is divided. The evaluation results show that the monitoring level of DK344+200~DK344+220 section is C.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LU Junfu1 ZHANG Hongxin1 PEI Qifan2
KeywordsRailway tunnel   Monitoring and measurement   Risk analysis theory   Monitoring level     
Abstract: The instrumentation and monitoring in the construction phase of railway tunnels is an important means to ensure the informatization construction. At present, the instrumentation and monitoring items and contents of the tunnel are mainly determined by the qualitative determination of the surrounding rock level. No unified quantitative evaluation system has been established. Based on the risk analysis theory and the risk probability index & risk consequence index faced by tunnel, the monitoring level and classification method of railway tunnel construction phase are established. We take the unascertained measurement theory as the risk probability index evaluation method, select eight impact indexes, such as rock weathering degree, rock quality index and uniaxial saturated compressive strength, and construct the index measurement function. Also, we combine the improved analytic hierarchy process to weight each evaluation index, determine the risk probability index according to the confidence identification criteria, and calculate the monitoring level index quantitatively to determine the monitoring level and corresponding monitoring content. Taking Xiaocaoba Tunnel of Chongqing-Kunming Railway as an example, the monitoring level of the three mileage sections of the tunnel during construction phase is divided. The evaluation results show that the monitoring level of DK344+200~DK344+220 section is C.
KeywordsRailway tunnel,   Monitoring and measurement,   Risk analysis theory,   Monitoring level     
Cite this article:   
LU Junfu1 ZHANG Hongxin1 PEI Qifan2 .Classification Method of Monitoring Level in Railway Tunnel Construction Phase and Its Application[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(1): 202-208
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I1/202
 
No references of article
[1] ZHANG Minqing1 XIN Weike1 JIA Dapeng1 SI Jingzhao2 WANG Huanlong3.Study and Application of Key Technical Parameters of Pre-grouting in High-pressure Water-rich Deep Shaft Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 177-186
[2] DUAN Lian1 LI Yongheng2 WU Jianghang1.Stability Evaluation for the Lining Structures of Tunnels with Large Corrosion Areas in Sulfate Environment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 212-220
[3] ZHOU Xiaojun1 NING Yuansi2 YANG Changyu3.Design and Engineering Application of Prefabricated Structure for Secondary Lining Arch of Double-Track Railway Tunnels Constructed by the Mining Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 204-217
[4] LI Weilin1 ZHANG Guang1 ZHU Yingwei1 HU Shaohua1,2.A 3D Numerical Simulation Study on the Ventilation of T-Shaped Tunnels with Different Bifurcation Angles during Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 158-166
[5] WANG Mingnian1,2 GUO Xiaohan1,2 NI Guangbin3 YU Li1,2 LI Chunhui1,2.A Discussion on the Control Standards for Smoke CO Concentration during Fires in High-altitude Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 40-45
[6] YAO Jie1,2.Analysis on Factors Influencing the Pneumatic Load during Train Operation in High-speed Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 166-171
[7] WANG Mingnian1,2 YANG Henghong1,2 ZHANG Yiteng1,2 LIU Kerui1,2 YU Li1,2.Research and Application of the Safety Coefficient Method for the Middle Rock Pillar of Parallel Tunnels with Small Clear Distance[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 11-19
[8] CHEN Guodong1 GAN Mufei2 LIU Ke2.Key Design Technologies for Mechanized Construction of Railway Tunnels by Drilling and Blasting Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 200-209
[9] ZHANG Peng1 WANG Lichuan2, 3 LI Linyi3 YAO Yong1 ZHANG Xuemin3 ZHENG Bo4 LIU Maobing5.The Concept and Practice of Treatment for Damage in Railway Tunnel Linings Caused by High-pressure Karst Water[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 227-241
[10] YUAN Wei1 LU Junfu2 LIU Jinsong1 WU Junmeng1.Cause Analysis of Persistent Heaving of Tunnel Floors in Red-bed Mudstone with Complex Geo-stress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 242-250
[11] SUN Yi.Analysis on Gas Characteristics of the Sichuan Red-bed Section of ChengduGuiyang Railway and Suggestion on Division of Gas Working Areas in the Survey Stage[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 195-199
[12] DING Zhi1,2 FENG Conglie1,2 QIU Shuo1 LU Zhao3 FAN Juncong4.Analysis on Ground Surface Deformation and Influence of Construction Parameters Caused by Two Different Shield Machines in Double-tube Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 183-194
[13] TANG Langzhou1,2 YU Li1,2 WANG Yusuo1,2 WANG Zhuhong1,2 WANG Mingnian1,2.Numerical Analysis on the Effect of Strike-slip Fault Dislocation on the Structural Safety of Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 214-224
[14] ZHANG Minqing1 JIA Dapeng1 WANG Shuishan2 GAO Cuncheng3.New Automatic Pouring and Vibrating Techniques for the Construction of Railway Tunnel Lining[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 29-34
[15] CHEN Shaohua.Study on New Structural Type of the Emergency Rescue Station of Mabaishan Tunnel in Qinling Mountains[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 35-41
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY