Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (6) :240-250    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Structural Health Assessment of TBM Water Diversion Tunnels Based on the AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theoretical Model
(1. Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004;2. School of Water Conservancy,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046; 3. Power China Beijing Engineering Corporation Limited, Beijing 100024)
Download: PDF (4570KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To ensure the safe construction and operation of water diversion tunnels, a TBM water diversion tunnel project was used as the research case. Utilizing field monitoring data, a comprehensive structural health evaluation method based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theory was proposed, considering structural response, durability, and external factors. The influence of AHP and the AHP-MatterElement Extension-Variable Weight Theory on the weights, nearness degrees of various evaluation indicators, and health grades was explored, identifying key indicators affecting the structural health of the water diversion tunnel.Research results show that the variable weights adjust dynamically with indicator values, enabling real-time and accurate tunnel health status evaluation. The computed grade characteristic values for the tunnel structure by the two methods are 1.589 and 1.695, respectively, corresponding to the basic safety status of grade B. Apart from concrete strength and grout properties, the variable weight values and grade characteristic values of other indicators increase with their respective values. Segment settlement, segment opening, segment misalignment, and segment cracking are identified as the most sensitive indicators of TBM water diversion tunnel health status. The proposed AHP-MatterElement Extension-Variable Weight Theory method can provide precise health status evaluation for water diversion tunnel structures.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Yina1 CHEN Lei2
3 HOU Ge2 ZHI Baoping1 LIU He2
KeywordsWater diversion tunnel   Health assessment   AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theory; Sensitivity     
Abstract: To ensure the safe construction and operation of water diversion tunnels, a TBM water diversion tunnel project was used as the research case. Utilizing field monitoring data, a comprehensive structural health evaluation method based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theory was proposed, considering structural response, durability, and external factors. The influence of AHP and the AHP-MatterElement Extension-Variable Weight Theory on the weights, nearness degrees of various evaluation indicators, and health grades was explored, identifying key indicators affecting the structural health of the water diversion tunnel.Research results show that the variable weights adjust dynamically with indicator values, enabling real-time and accurate tunnel health status evaluation. The computed grade characteristic values for the tunnel structure by the two methods are 1.589 and 1.695, respectively, corresponding to the basic safety status of grade B. Apart from concrete strength and grout properties, the variable weight values and grade characteristic values of other indicators increase with their respective values. Segment settlement, segment opening, segment misalignment, and segment cracking are identified as the most sensitive indicators of TBM water diversion tunnel health status. The proposed AHP-MatterElement Extension-Variable Weight Theory method can provide precise health status evaluation for water diversion tunnel structures.
KeywordsWater diversion tunnel,   Health assessment,   AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theory; Sensitivity     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yina1 CHEN Lei2, 3 HOU Ge2 ZHI Baoping1 LIU He2 .Structural Health Assessment of TBM Water Diversion Tunnels Based on the AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theoretical Model[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(6): 240-250
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I6/240
 
No references of article
[1] YANG Fan1 HE Fusheng1 YAN Qixiang3 LI Weidong2 CHEN Jian2 ZHAO Zechang3.Study on Grouting Technology for Water Gushing in Sandy Dolomite Stratum with High Water Level[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 255-265
[2] WENG Yuan1 LI Aichun1 ZHAO Ting1 LIU Buwu2.Research on Factors Influencing the Resilience of the Tunnel System and Related Evaluation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 40-47
[3] GUO Yalin1,2 SUN Wenhao3 XU Hongwei3 HE Wei3 CHEN Zheng1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Comparison between Shield Method and Drill and Blast Method Regarding Carbon Emission Intensity in Subway Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 14-23
[4] ZHANG Xuejun1 NIE Qiqiang2 GONG Yuanjiang3.Study on Large Deformation Law of Soft Rock Tunnel in Red Bed in Central Yunnan[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 156-163
[5] ZHU Caihui1,2 YING Li2 YANG Qiqiang2 LI Yubo3.A Study on Reduction Coefficient of External Hydraulic Pressure at the Lining of Diversion Tunnel in Saturated Q2 Loess Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 94-102
[6] HU Changming1,2 LI Liang1 MEI Yuan1,2 YUAN Yili1 WANG Zhiyu1.Global Sensitivity Analysis on Parameters of the Prediction Model for Shield Vertical Attitude[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 127-134
[7] LIU Ping1 LIU Chi2 WANG Hongtao1 ZHANG Hongjun3 YANG Yong4 ZHANG Xin1 LIU Luyao1.Numerical Simulation Study on the Deformation and Failure Mechanism of Tunnel Surrounding Rock under the Effect of Water-rich Sand Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 74-81
[8] ZHANG Yiteng1 SUN Xingliang2 JIANG Yongtao1 YU Li1 JIANG Fan3 CHEN Mingyue3 XIAO Zerong4.Research on Vault Ultimate Displacement at Different Tunnel Construction Stages in Surrounding Rock of Grade Ⅴ[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 91-97
[9] ZHANG Yang1 LIU Shannan1 WU Jun1 CHEN Jiakang1 XIAO Xiaochun2 LI Lei2.Sensitivity and Its Impact of Strata Parameters on Ground Surface Settlements during Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 127-134
[10] WANG Daoyuan1,2,3 YUAN Jinxiu1 WANG Jiping1 WANG Kai4 XIA Yong4 WANG Haijiao4 WEN Ming4.Deformation Prediction and Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Pipe Roof in Shallow Soft Rock Tunnels Considering[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 79-86
[11] HOU Xinyu YUAN Jiaojiao LIN Yanling.Sensitivity Analysis of the Influence of External Wall Insertion Ratio on Deformation of Pit-in-Pit[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(6): 87-93
[12] .Frequency Domain Dynamic Response of a Submerged Floating Tunnel Anchor Cable under Random Wave Force Excitation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(6): 174-179
[13] WANG Hui1,2.Sensitivity Analysis of the Effect of Depth and Slope Gradient on the Surrounding Rock Stability for Shallow-Buried Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(4): 91-96
[14] .Bayes Discriminative Model for Predicting Rockburst Grades[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(4): 146-151
[15] YUAN Yulin1 LAI Yuanming2.The Identification and Classification of Freezing-Thawing and Frozen Environments for the Surrounding Rocks of Tunnels in Cold Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,53(3): 19-25
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY