Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (1) :107-118    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Deformation Failure Process and Characteristics of Tunnels with Different Flatness Ratios under Horizontal Interbedding Conditions
(School of Highway, Chang′an University, Xi′an 710064)
Download: PDF (8628KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The test pieces of interbedded surrounding rock tunnel with different flatness ratios were prefabricated, to study the deformation and failure characteristics around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel through tests, and numerical simulation was used to analyze and compare the distribution of stress and strain around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel. Three different flatness ratios of 0.45 (test specimen S), 0.55 (test specimen M) and 0.65(test specimen L) were used respectively. The study shows that the overall failure mode of test specimen S is compression failure mode (TC mode), obvious compression and shear failure easily occurs at the arch waist, and a tension-shear composite crack is formed near the arch shoulder. Test specimen M was subjected to mixed failure (TX mode), in which obvious tensile failure at the arch crown easily occurred, and obvious compression-shear composite crack was formed at the arch shoulder. Test specimen L was subject to the hole failure (TH mode), in which obvious tensile failure easily occurred at the arch crown, and tension-shear composite crack was formed at the arch foot.Moreover, the distribution of stress and strain around the tunnel is significantly related to the compression failure characteristics of tunnels with different flatness ratios, and the difference of stress levels at the same location of the tunnel is the main reason for the different failure modes of the tunnels with three different flatness ratios.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HONG Ming FAN Xiang YANG Xiaohua REN Xianda
KeywordsInterstratified rock mass   Tunnel   Flatness ratio   Biaxial compression   Principal stress   Principal strain     
Abstract: The test pieces of interbedded surrounding rock tunnel with different flatness ratios were prefabricated, to study the deformation and failure characteristics around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel through tests, and numerical simulation was used to analyze and compare the distribution of stress and strain around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel. Three different flatness ratios of 0.45 (test specimen S), 0.55 (test specimen M) and 0.65(test specimen L) were used respectively. The study shows that the overall failure mode of test specimen S is compression failure mode (TC mode), obvious compression and shear failure easily occurs at the arch waist, and a tension-shear composite crack is formed near the arch shoulder. Test specimen M was subjected to mixed failure (TX mode), in which obvious tensile failure at the arch crown easily occurred, and obvious compression-shear composite crack was formed at the arch shoulder. Test specimen L was subject to the hole failure (TH mode), in which obvious tensile failure easily occurred at the arch crown, and tension-shear composite crack was formed at the arch foot.Moreover, the distribution of stress and strain around the tunnel is significantly related to the compression failure characteristics of tunnels with different flatness ratios, and the difference of stress levels at the same location of the tunnel is the main reason for the different failure modes of the tunnels with three different flatness ratios.
KeywordsInterstratified rock mass,   Tunnel,   Flatness ratio,   Biaxial compression,   Principal stress,   Principal strain     
Cite this article:   
HONG Ming FAN Xiang YANG Xiaohua REN Xianda .Deformation Failure Process and Characteristics of Tunnels with Different Flatness Ratios under Horizontal Interbedding Conditions[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(1): 107-118
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I1/107
 
No references of article
[1] LI Zhensong1 GUO Qinghua2 ZHANG Ning1 HE rongjian2 ZHANG Xiaoping1 ZHANG Haoran1.Influence of Permeability Characteristics of Vertical Zonation in Water-rich Karst on External Water Pressure of Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 37-49
[2] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[3] HAO Junsuo1 ZHANG Xiangbing1 WANG Shiguang1 CHU Xiaojin1 SU Peidong2.Study on Gas Occurrence Characteristics and Prevention Technology for Tunnels in Natural Gas-bearing Sandstone Formation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 241-253
[4] ZHANG Yina1 CHEN Lei2,3 HOU Ge2 ZHI Baoping1 LIU He2.Structural Health Assessment of TBM Water Diversion Tunnels Based on the AHP-Matter-Element Extension-Variable Weight Theoretical Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 240-250
[5] SU Peidong LU Xinghao LI Yougui QIU Peng AN Xingling.Study on Multi-factors Affecting Construction Ventilation in Hydraulic Tunnels with Gas in Tingzikou Irrigation Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 180-191
[6] YANG Fan1 HE Fusheng1 YAN Qixiang3 LI Weidong2 CHEN Jian2 ZHAO Zechang3.Study on Grouting Technology for Water Gushing in Sandy Dolomite Stratum with High Water Level[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 255-265
[7] YANG Zhaofeng1 WANG Bo2 DU Yongquan1 HUANG Changkuan1 FAN Yong1.Application of Active Support Technology for Large Deformation in Haidong Soft Rock Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 245-252
[8] MA Yalina1,2 CHEN Yaqi1,2 LIU Jiguo1,2 CUI Zhen3 ZHOU Guangxin4.Research on Failure Mechanism of Tunnel with Articulated Lining Crossing Strike-slip Fault[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 136-147
[9] MENG Qinghui1 FENG Kun1 YANG Guodong1 HE Xiao2 YANG Zhao2 HUANG Qingfu3 GAO Chong1,4.Study on the Influence of Internal Water Pressure on the Composite Lining Structure of Water Conveyance Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 33-42
[10] ZHANG Xuejun1 NIE Qiqiang2 GONG Yuanjiang3.Study on Large Deformation Law of Soft Rock Tunnel in Red Bed in Central Yunnan[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 156-163
[11] LIU Wanlin1 SHANG Mingming2 WANG Quansheng2 WANG Donghong2 WEN Shiyu1.Comparison and Selection of Construction Schemes for the Boom-type Roadheader in Small-section Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 266-273
[12] ZHU Caihui1,2 YING Li2 YANG Qiqiang2 LI Yubo3.A Study on Reduction Coefficient of External Hydraulic Pressure at the Lining of Diversion Tunnel in Saturated Q2 Loess Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 94-102
[13] LIU Quanwei1,2 LIN Wenhao1 LI Weiteng1 QIN Zhe1 FENG Qiang1 YANG Xuxu1.Study on Model Test of Shallow Hard-rock Tunnel Failure Mode by the Action of Overload[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 125-131
[14] LEI Zhongdai1,2 KONG Xinli3 WANG Wenye3 YAN Zhiguo1,2.Numerical Simulation Study on Loosened Zone of Surrounding Rock of Large-span Flat Caverns[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 41-46
[15] ZHANG Jinliang1 HUANG Qiuxiang2 WANG Xueying1 HU Chao2 ZHANG Shaoxuan2.Study on Engineering Influence of Defects in Pea Gravel Backfilling and Grouting Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 163-172
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY