Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (1) :107-118    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Deformation Failure Process and Characteristics of Tunnels with Different Flatness Ratios under Horizontal Interbedding Conditions
(School of Highway, Chang′an University, Xi′an 710064)
Download: PDF (8628KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The test pieces of interbedded surrounding rock tunnel with different flatness ratios were prefabricated, to study the deformation and failure characteristics around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel through tests, and numerical simulation was used to analyze and compare the distribution of stress and strain around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel. Three different flatness ratios of 0.45 (test specimen S), 0.55 (test specimen M) and 0.65(test specimen L) were used respectively. The study shows that the overall failure mode of test specimen S is compression failure mode (TC mode), obvious compression and shear failure easily occurs at the arch waist, and a tension-shear composite crack is formed near the arch shoulder. Test specimen M was subjected to mixed failure (TX mode), in which obvious tensile failure at the arch crown easily occurred, and obvious compression-shear composite crack was formed at the arch shoulder. Test specimen L was subject to the hole failure (TH mode), in which obvious tensile failure easily occurred at the arch crown, and tension-shear composite crack was formed at the arch foot.Moreover, the distribution of stress and strain around the tunnel is significantly related to the compression failure characteristics of tunnels with different flatness ratios, and the difference of stress levels at the same location of the tunnel is the main reason for the different failure modes of the tunnels with three different flatness ratios.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HONG Ming FAN Xiang YANG Xiaohua REN Xianda
KeywordsInterstratified rock mass   Tunnel   Flatness ratio   Biaxial compression   Principal stress   Principal strain     
Abstract: The test pieces of interbedded surrounding rock tunnel with different flatness ratios were prefabricated, to study the deformation and failure characteristics around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel through tests, and numerical simulation was used to analyze and compare the distribution of stress and strain around the interbedded surrounding rock tunnel. Three different flatness ratios of 0.45 (test specimen S), 0.55 (test specimen M) and 0.65(test specimen L) were used respectively. The study shows that the overall failure mode of test specimen S is compression failure mode (TC mode), obvious compression and shear failure easily occurs at the arch waist, and a tension-shear composite crack is formed near the arch shoulder. Test specimen M was subjected to mixed failure (TX mode), in which obvious tensile failure at the arch crown easily occurred, and obvious compression-shear composite crack was formed at the arch shoulder. Test specimen L was subject to the hole failure (TH mode), in which obvious tensile failure easily occurred at the arch crown, and tension-shear composite crack was formed at the arch foot.Moreover, the distribution of stress and strain around the tunnel is significantly related to the compression failure characteristics of tunnels with different flatness ratios, and the difference of stress levels at the same location of the tunnel is the main reason for the different failure modes of the tunnels with three different flatness ratios.
KeywordsInterstratified rock mass,   Tunnel,   Flatness ratio,   Biaxial compression,   Principal stress,   Principal strain     
Cite this article:   
HONG Ming FAN Xiang YANG Xiaohua REN Xianda .Deformation Failure Process and Characteristics of Tunnels with Different Flatness Ratios under Horizontal Interbedding Conditions[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(1): 107-118
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I1/107
 
No references of article
[1] ZHU Caihui1,2 YING Li2 YANG Qiqiang2 LI Yubo3.A Study on Reduction Coefficient of External Hydraulic Pressure at the Lining of Diversion Tunnel in Saturated Q2 Loess Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 94-102
[2] LIU Quanwei1,2 LIN Wenhao1 LI Weiteng1 QIN Zhe1 FENG Qiang1 YANG Xuxu1.Study on Model Test of Shallow Hard-rock Tunnel Failure Mode by the Action of Overload[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 125-131
[3] LEI Zhongdai1,2 KONG Xinli3 WANG Wenye3 YAN Zhiguo1,2.Numerical Simulation Study on Loosened Zone of Surrounding Rock of Large-span Flat Caverns[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 41-46
[4] ZHANG Jinliang1 HUANG Qiuxiang2 WANG Xueying1 HU Chao2 ZHANG Shaoxuan2.Study on Engineering Influence of Defects in Pea Gravel Backfilling and Grouting Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 163-172
[5] HUI Qiang1 ZHANG Jun2 JIANG Haibo1.Study on the Characteristics and Distribution Laws of Plastic Zone Induced by Deep-buried High-geostress Hydraulic Tunnelling in Jointed Rock Mass[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 86-94
[6] ZHANG Chang′an1 QI Xiangcheng2.Solutions to the Spherical Cavity Grouting Pressure in Circular Tunnels Based on the Generalized SMP Strength Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 79-83
[7] ZHANG Jie1 LI Wei1 LI Limin2 WAN Jiwei3 DING Weihua4 JIA Chao1.Influence of Tectonic Characteristics of Surrounding Rocks on Engineering Geology of Water Conveyance Tunnel in the Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Valley Water Diversion Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 23-32
[8] YU Yuanxiang YAO Yao WANG Jingbin WANG Fuyu KE Da.Study on Main Controlling Factors of Surrounding Rock Stability and Support Optimization of Deep-buried Tunnels under the Coupling Action of Anchor Bolts and Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 19-26
[9] DENG Mingjiang1 TAN Zhongsheng2.Some Issues during TBM Trial Advance of Super-long Tunnel Group and Development Direction of Construction Technology[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 1-12
[10] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[11] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[12] YUAN Xianfan1 LIAO Dan2.Research on Interpretation Method of TRT Test Results Based on GOCAD[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(3): 18-24
[13] AO Linhai1 ZHU Kaibin2 GUO Qiliang1 PEI Xiaodong3 HOU Yanhe1.In-situ Stress Measurement and Analysis of Failure Mechanism of Surrounding Rocks at the Rasuwagadhi Hydropower Station in Nepal[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(2): 44-49
[14] WANG Zaimin1 CHEN Yulin1 XU Mo1 ZHANG Shishu2 YONG Ping1.Study on Water Inflow and Burst in the Hydraulic Tunnel of Hydropower Projects in Southwest China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 27-32
[15] WANG Sui1 ZHONG Zuliang1, 2 LIU Xinrong1, 2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution for a Deep-buried and Pressured Circular Tunnel Considering Seepage Effect[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 39-46
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY