Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :11-19    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Approaches in the Full Life Cycle of River-crossing Shield Tunnels
(1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240; 2. Shanghai Urban Construction and Operation (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200023)
Download: PDF (2990KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The river-crossing tunnel is an important traffic infrastructure in the urban traffic network and one of the main sources of carbon emission in urban traffic, so it is necessary to investigate carbon emission measurement and assessment of river-crossing tunnels and emission reduction mechanism. The first step is to establish the carbon emission measurement boundary and list for the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels. The life cycle is divided into two parts, i.e. materialization stage and O&M stage. Based on the list analysis, the carbon emission measurement model for the full life cycle of river-crossing shield tunnels is created based on the carbon emission factor method,the correlation between the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels and the engineering activities is systematically analyzed, and the river-crossing tunnel carbon emission reduction effect estimation process driven by green technologies is devised. The carbon emission result is represented by using the carbon emission reduction effect coefficient. As the study indicates: there is severe lack of quantitative research into the carbon emission reduction effect of various green technologies both at home and abroad. In the materialization stage, the unit carbon emission of shield tunnel increases as the tunnel diameter increases, and there is only limited potential of carbon emission reduction as long as the material and structural design remain unchanged. In the O&M stage, the carbon emission of mechanical and electrical installations is largely equivalent to the carbon emission in the materialization stage. From the aspect of full life cycle, the O&M stage has greater potential of carbon emission reduction and better controllability.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
AI Qing1 LI Yixuan1 ZHU Junyi2
KeywordsRiver-crossing shield tunnels   Carbon emission   Green technologies   Emission reduction effect assess? ment     
Abstract: The river-crossing tunnel is an important traffic infrastructure in the urban traffic network and one of the main sources of carbon emission in urban traffic, so it is necessary to investigate carbon emission measurement and assessment of river-crossing tunnels and emission reduction mechanism. The first step is to establish the carbon emission measurement boundary and list for the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels. The life cycle is divided into two parts, i.e. materialization stage and O&M stage. Based on the list analysis, the carbon emission measurement model for the full life cycle of river-crossing shield tunnels is created based on the carbon emission factor method,the correlation between the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels and the engineering activities is systematically analyzed, and the river-crossing tunnel carbon emission reduction effect estimation process driven by green technologies is devised. The carbon emission result is represented by using the carbon emission reduction effect coefficient. As the study indicates: there is severe lack of quantitative research into the carbon emission reduction effect of various green technologies both at home and abroad. In the materialization stage, the unit carbon emission of shield tunnel increases as the tunnel diameter increases, and there is only limited potential of carbon emission reduction as long as the material and structural design remain unchanged. In the O&M stage, the carbon emission of mechanical and electrical installations is largely equivalent to the carbon emission in the materialization stage. From the aspect of full life cycle, the O&M stage has greater potential of carbon emission reduction and better controllability.
KeywordsRiver-crossing shield tunnels,   Carbon emission,   Green technologies,   Emission reduction effect assess? ment     
Cite this article:   
AI Qing1 LI Yixuan1 ZHU Junyi2 .Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Approaches in the Full Life Cycle of River-crossing Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 11-19
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I6/11
 
No references of article
[1] LI Jiahao1 XI Mingxing2 SHEN Yi1 LIU An2 ZHU Hehua1.Calculation and Composition Assessment of the Carbon Emission in the Construction Phase of Highway Tunnels Based on SimaPro[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 20-28
[2] ZENG Hongrui1,2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[3] Zhang Xiaoying1 Liu Tao2 Shen Yi2 Liu An3.Analysis of the Effect of Lighting on Carbon Emission in the Full Life Cycle of Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 40-47
[4] YIN Yan BAO Weixing LU Hanqing ZHANG Zhiyong CHE Bowen PAN Zhenhua LIN Xuhui.Study on the Carbon Emission Characteristics and Carbon Emission Reduction Model in the Sewage Treatment Process in the Tianshan Shengli Tunnel Construction Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 58-67
[5] LIU Shihao1 SONG Zhanping1,2,3 XU Leilei4 XIA Zhenzhao5 WANG Junbao1,2,3.Optimization of Method Statement for Low-carbon Tunnel Construction Based on SVM-MAUT[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 68-79
[6] GUO Yalin1,2 SUN Wenhao3 XU Hongwei3 HE Wei3 CHEN Zheng1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Comparison between Shield Method and Drill and Blast Method Regarding Carbon Emission Intensity in Subway Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 14-23
[7] GUO Chun1,2 GUO Yalin1,2 CHEN Zheng1,2.Carbon Emission Accounting and Research Progress Analysis of Traffic Tunnel Engineering[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 1-10
[8] GONG Chenjie1 YANG Junsheng1 FU Jinyang1, 2.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Segment Cracking of LargeDiameter River-Crossing Shield Tunnelling in Composite Rock Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[9] Li Qiaosong1 Bai Yun2 Li Lin2.Study of Influential Factors and Measures for Low Carbonization During the Construction of Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(3): 1-7
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY