Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (4) :126-134    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Calculation Method and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission during Construction of Rectangular Pipe-jacking Tunnels
(1. School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144; 2. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044; 3. China Railway Fourth Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd.,Wuhan 430064; 4. Haixia Traffic Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350004)
Download: PDF (3369KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Based on the rectangular pipe jacking project at the square in front of Putian Railway Station and using the life cycle theory framework combined with the emission coefficient method, this study investigates the calculation method and influencing factors of carbon emissions during the construction of rectangular pipe-jacking tunnels.The research indicates that cement, steel, and electricity are the primary sources of carbon emissions during the construction of rectangular pipe-jacking tunnels. The jacking length of the tunnel is directly proportional to the total carbon emissions of the project, but inversely proportional to the carbon emissions per meter. When the jacking length increases from 224 m to 424 m, the carbon emissions per meter decrease the most, with a reduction of over 26%. When the segment width increases from 1.2 m to 2.4 m, the carbon emissions in terms of segment waterproofing decrease by up to 72%. For the same excavation length, increasing the segment width from 1.2 m to 1.5 m provides the best carbon emission reduction benefits, with a maximum reduction of 4.3%. When the segment width exceeds 1.5 m, the reduction in carbon emissions per meter is no longer significant.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsRectangular pipe-jacking tunnel   Construction period   Carbon emissions   Calculation method   Segment width   Jacking length     
Abstract: Based on the rectangular pipe jacking project at the square in front of Putian Railway Station and using the life cycle theory framework combined with the emission coefficient method, this study investigates the calculation method and influencing factors of carbon emissions during the construction of rectangular pipe-jacking tunnels.The research indicates that cement, steel, and electricity are the primary sources of carbon emissions during the construction of rectangular pipe-jacking tunnels. The jacking length of the tunnel is directly proportional to the total carbon emissions of the project, but inversely proportional to the carbon emissions per meter. When the jacking length increases from 224 m to 424 m, the carbon emissions per meter decrease the most, with a reduction of over 26%. When the segment width increases from 1.2 m to 2.4 m, the carbon emissions in terms of segment waterproofing decrease by up to 72%. For the same excavation length, increasing the segment width from 1.2 m to 1.5 m provides the best carbon emission reduction benefits, with a maximum reduction of 4.3%. When the segment width exceeds 1.5 m, the reduction in carbon emissions per meter is no longer significant.
KeywordsRectangular pipe-jacking tunnel,   Construction period,   Carbon emissions,   Calculation method,   Segment width,   Jacking length     
Cite this article:   
.Study on Calculation Method and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission during Construction of Rectangular Pipe-jacking Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(4): 126-134
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I4/126
 
No references of article
[1] CHEN Xiangsheng 1,2,3 CHEN Kunyang1,2,3 QIU Tong1,2,3 WANG Lei 1,2,3 HE Qiufeng1,2,3 LAI Yani1,2,3CHEN Wuxiong4 FU Yanbin1,2,3.Review of Research on Embodied Carbon Emissions in Urban Rail Transit Infrastructure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 1-13
[2] AI Qing1 LI Yixuan1 ZHU Junyi2.Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Approaches in the Full Life Cycle of River-crossing Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 11-19
[3] LI Jiahao1 XI Mingxing2 SHEN Yi1 LIU An2 ZHU Hehua1.Calculation and Composition Assessment of the Carbon Emission in the Construction Phase of Highway Tunnels Based on SimaPro[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 20-28
[4] ZENG Hongrui1,2 SUN Wenhao3 HE Wei3 GUO Yalin1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Study on the Carbon Emission Prediction Model for Railway Tunnel Construction Based on Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[5] Zhang Xiaoying1 Liu Tao2 Shen Yi2 Liu An3.Analysis of the Effect of Lighting on Carbon Emission in the Full Life Cycle of Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 40-47
[6] YIN Yan BAO Weixing LU Hanqing ZHANG Zhiyong CHE Bowen PAN Zhenhua LIN Xuhui.Study on the Carbon Emission Characteristics and Carbon Emission Reduction Model in the Sewage Treatment Process in the Tianshan Shengli Tunnel Construction Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 58-67
[7] LIU Shihao1 SONG Zhanping1,2,3 XU Leilei4 XIA Zhenzhao5 WANG Junbao1,2,3.Optimization of Method Statement for Low-carbon Tunnel Construction Based on SVM-MAUT[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 68-79
[8] GUO Yalin1,2 SUN Wenhao3 XU Hongwei3 HE Wei3 CHEN Zheng1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Comparison between Shield Method and Drill and Blast Method Regarding Carbon Emission Intensity in Subway Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 14-23
[9] GUO Chun1,2 GUO Yalin1,2 CHEN Zheng1,2.Carbon Emission Accounting and Research Progress Analysis of Traffic Tunnel Engineering[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 1-10
[10] .Calculation Method and Engineering Application of Drawdown Induced by Tunnel Water Leakage[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(6): 86-92
[11] WANG Zhilong1,2 ZHOU Renqiang3 YANG Nie1,2 WANG Mingnian1,2 LIU Dagang1,2.Hoek-Brown Criterion Based Calculation Method of Rock Resistant Coefficient in Tunnelling and Its Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 84-90
[12] JIANG Yongtao1 WANG Mingnian1 ZHANG Yiteng1 YU Li1 JIANG Fan2 XIAO Zerong3.Prediction Method for Surface Settlement in Tunnel Construction with Pipe Curtain Support[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 82-90
[13] SUN Huixiang WANG Haiping.Research and Application of the Construction Ventilation Techniques for Large Underground Cavern Group[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(6): 187-195
[14] WANG Jialei JI Xinbo.Comparative Analysis of Calculation Methods for Jacking Force of Jacking Pipes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(6): 11-18
[15] YU Cheng-Shuo-1, 2 , DING Wen-Qi-1, 2 , ZHANG Qing-Zhao-1, 2 .[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 11-18
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY