Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (3) :138-142    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
The Orthogonal Test Analysis of the Minimum Buried Depth of a Shallow Shield Tunnel

(Faculty of Architecture Engineering, Zhengzhou Vocational College of Economics and Trade, Zhengzhou 450002)

Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract  Serious accidents involving front collapse and water bursting are mostly attributed to the excessively thin overburden of shield tunnels. In this paper, the existing problems with the current calculation theory for the minimum buried depth of an underwater shield tunnel are analyzed and an improved calculation formula for minimum depth is given considering such factors as the anti-floating safety coefficient, soil shear strength, and grouting pressure behind the segment. Meanwhile, by using the orthogonal test analysis method without null columns, the range analysis and variance analysis of various factors that affect the determination of the tunnel buried depth, such as tunnel radius, segment thickness, grouting pressure, effective unit weight and effective internal friction angle of the overlaying soil, and soil viscosity, are carried out, and the significant influential factors for the minimum buried depth and its tendency to vary with various factors are derived. The study shows that segment thickness and effective internal friction angle have minimal influence on the variation of buried depth but grouting pressure greatly influences it. The order of influence of the factors related to the given formula is: grouting pressure, soil viscosity, effective unit weight of the soil, tunnel radius, effective internal friction angle of the soil, and segment thickness.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
JIAO Jian-Wei
Wang-Kong-Qian
KeywordsShield tunnel   Overburden   Orthogonal test   Influence factor      
Abstract: Serious accidents involving front collapse and water bursting are mostly attributed to the excessively thin overburden of shield tunnels. In this paper, the existing problems with the current calculation theory for the minimum buried depth of an underwater shield tunnel are analyzed and an improved calculation formula for minimum depth is given considering such factors as the anti-floating safety coefficient, soil shear strength, and grouting pressure behind the segment. Meanwhile, by using the orthogonal test analysis method without null columns, the range analysis and variance analysis of various factors that affect the determination of the tunnel buried depth, such as tunnel radius, segment thickness, grouting pressure, effective unit weight and effective internal friction angle of the overlaying soil, and soil viscosity, are carried out, and the significant influential factors for the minimum buried depth and its tendency to vary with various factors are derived. The study shows that segment thickness and effective internal friction angle have minimal influence on the variation of buried depth but grouting pressure greatly influences it. The order of influence of the factors related to the given formula is: grouting pressure, soil viscosity, effective unit weight of the soil, tunnel radius, effective internal friction angle of the soil, and segment thickness.
KeywordsShield tunnel,   Overburden,   Orthogonal test,   Influence factor      
published: 2013-07-08
Cite this article:   
JIAO Jian-Wei, Wang-Kong-Qian .The Orthogonal Test Analysis of the Minimum Buried Depth of a Shallow Shield Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(3): 138-142
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I3/138
 
No references of article
[1] CHEN Xiangsheng 1,2,3 CHEN Kunyang1,2,3 QIU Tong1,2,3 WANG Lei 1,2,3 HE Qiufeng1,2,3 LAI Yani1,2,3CHEN Wuxiong4 FU Yanbin1,2,3.Review of Research on Embodied Carbon Emissions in Urban Rail Transit Infrastructure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 1-13
[2] SU Peidong LU Xinghao LI Yougui QIU Peng AN Xingling.Study on Multi-factors Affecting Construction Ventilation in Hydraulic Tunnels with Gas in Tingzikou Irrigation Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 180-191
[3] PAN Tong1 ZHANG Junru1 DAI Yi1 CHEN Pengtao1 MA Kaimeng1,2.Variation Pattern of Surrounding Rock Bearing Arch of Deep Tunnel and Analysis on Its Impact[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 72-84
[4] WU Zhongtan1 WU Xianguo2 LIU Jun2 CHEN Hongyu3 XIAO Hongdi2,4 QIN Yawei2,4.Shield Attitude Optimization and Control Based on Random Forest-NSGA-Ⅲ[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 48-57
[5] YAO Jie1,2.Analysis on Factors Influencing the Pneumatic Load during Train Operation in High-speed Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 166-171
[6] MA Jian.Research in the Impact of Shield Tunnel Crossing on Existing Pipelines and Future Research Trends[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 23-30
[7] FU Yifan1,2 WANG Linfeng1,2 CHENG Ping1,2 TANG Ning1,2 ZHOU Nan1,2.Study on Thermal Stress Field and Cracking Control of Cast-in-situ Mass Concrete in a Box Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 173-181
[8] MA Li1 WANG Qicai1 LI Sheng1 LIU Yapeng2 NING Guixia1 HAN Guoqiang1.Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Influencing Factors of High-filled Cut-and-Cover Tunnel in Trench[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(6): 133-141
[9] LIU Ping1 LIU Chi2 WANG Hongtao1 ZHANG Hongjun3 YANG Yong4 ZHANG Xin1 LIU Luyao1.Numerical Simulation Study on the Deformation and Failure Mechanism of Tunnel Surrounding Rock under the Effect of Water-rich Sand Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 74-81
[10] ZHANG Jing1, 2.Study on Calculations and Influence Factors of Bending Stiffness of Segment Ring Joints of Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 104-112
[11] WANG Xu1 MENG Lu1 YANG Gang2 LU Song1.On Influencing Factors of the Tunnel Geological Prediction Results Obtained by Multi-source Seismic Interferometry[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 58-66
[12] CHEN Xi1 ZHAO Yong2 YANG Yushun3.Effect of Rock Mechanical Parameters on Stability of Tunnel Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(5): 77-84
[13] WANG Yongdong ZHANG Ru ZHANG Yilong.Domestic and International Research on the Critical Velocity of Fires in Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(4): 14-24
[14] LIU Jianguo ZHOU Xiaojun XIAO Qinghua WANG Jinghe GAO Bo.On Criterion for Tunnel Rock Mass Slippage along a Structure Surface and Its Impact Factors[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(6): 103-110
[15] XU Pai1 JIANG Shuping2 ZHOU Jian2 CHEN Dafei2 XIE Yaohua2.Experimental Study on Smoke Temperature Distribution in Immersed Tunnel Fire Scenarios[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(5): 79-83
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY