[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (2) :52-59    DOI:
工程地质、勘察及设计 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
西南复杂艰险山区铁路隧道超前地质预报技术
(1.中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,成都 610031;2.中国地球物理学会中铁二院院士专家工作站,成都 610031;3.中铁二院劳模(专家)蒋良文地质创新工作室,成都 610031)
Advanced Geological Forecasting Techniques for Railway Tunnels in the Complex and Treacherous Mountainous Areas of Southwest China
(1. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., ltd., Chengdu 610031; 2. Chinese Geophysical Society Academician Expert Workstation of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., ltd., Chengdu 610031; 3. Jiang Liangwen Geological Innovation Studio of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., ltd., Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (2747KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 西南复杂艰险山区铁路具有隧线比高、隧道深埋特长、地质条件复杂等特点,工程地质问题突出,隧道施工过程中易发的塌方、突泥涌水、瓦斯爆炸(突出)等危害。为提高隧道超前地质预报的针对性、有效性和系统性,分析总结了各类常规超前地质预报方法的适用条件、优缺点以及应用环境,从而提出不同工况、不同类型的不良地质情况的超前预报方法选择与组合,进而构建不同预报方法选择与组合和“四结合”的综合超前地质预报模式。实践表明:(1)各种超前地质预报方法有其方法特点和一定的适用范围;(2)西南山区工程地质问题复杂,应根据隧道施工环境及主要的不良地质特征,充分发挥各方法优势并采用合理的方法组合,开展综合预报;(3)铁路隧道综合超前地质预报应采用勘察资料与洞内预报相结合、地质与物探相结合、长距离预报与中短距离预报相结合、不同物探方法相互结合的“四结合”模式;(4)构建的超前地质预报方法选择及组合和“四结合”模式可提高不良地质探测的针对性、有效性和系统性,有利于工程地质问题的解决,达到预报成果有效指导施工、降低施工风险的目的。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词铁路隧道   不良地质   方法选择与组合   综合超前地质预报模式     
Abstract: The railways in the complex and treacherous mountainous areas of Southwest China are characterized by high percentage of tunnels, deep and long tunnels, and complex geological conditions, which highlight prominent engineering geological issues and hazards like collapses, mud outbursts, and gas explosions (outbursts) during tunnel construction. To enhance the specificity, effectiveness, and systemic of advanced geological forecasting for tunnel construction, this paper analyzes and summarizes the applicable conditions, advantages and disadvantages, and the application environments of various conventional advanced geological forecasting methods. It proposes the selection and combination of forecasting methods for different working conditions and types of adverse geological situations,thereby establishing a comprehensive advanced geological forecasting model integrating different methodological selections and combinations with a "Four-combination" approach. Practice has shown that: (1) each advanced geological forecasting method has unique characteristics and a certain application scope; (2) due to the complex engineering geological issues in the Southwest mountainous areas, it is crucial to fully utilize the advantages of each method and adopt a reasonable combination for comprehensive forecasting based on the tunnel construction environment and primary adverse geological features; (3) comprehensive advanced geological forecasting for railway tunnels should adopt a "Four-combination" model, integrating survey data with in-tunnel forecasting, geological and geophysical methods, long-distance forecasting with medium and short-distance forecasting, and the integration of different geophysical methods; (4) the established method selection and combination for advanced geological forecasting and the "Four-combination" model can enhance the specificity, effectiveness, and systemic of detecting adverse geological conditions, with facilitating the resolution of engineering geological issues, effectively guiding construction, and reducing construction risks.
KeywordsRailway tunnels,   Adverse geology,   Method selection and combination,   Comprehensive advanced geologi? cal forecasting technologies     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(19721125063822839);国家重点研发计划(2021YFB2300604).
作者简介: 高树全(1984-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事工程物探方面的研究工作,E-mail:gaoshuquan_2006@163.com. 通讯作者:蒋良文(1965-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事铁路工程地质勘察设计及灾害防治研究工作,E-mail:497782546@qq.com.
引用本文:   
.西南复杂艰险山区铁路隧道超前地质预报技术[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(2): 52-59
.Advanced Geological Forecasting Techniques for Railway Tunnels in the Complex and Treacherous Mountainous Areas of Southwest China[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(2): 52-59
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I2/52
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 王明年1,2 邓 涛3 于 丽1,2.中国交通隧道运营及防灾通风技术发展与展望[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(2): 152-166
[2] 曾弘锐1,2 孙文昊3 何 卫3 郭亚林1,2 郭 春1,2.基于机器学习的铁路隧道施工碳排放预测模型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[3] 朱星宇 刘 征 张志强 冯 应.铁路隧道结构设计参数对二次衬砌裂缝影响规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 1-10
[4] 陈 伟1,2 张明红2 张 莹2 林 玲2.中老铁路某隧道盐岩工程地质特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 234-242
[5] 朵生君.铁路隧道TBM长距离施工通风技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 222-228
[6] 赵万强 1 路军富 2 汤 印 1 郑长青 1.铁路隧道底鼓风险等级划分方法及控制措施研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 178-187
[7] 陈锡武 1 卿伟宸 1 刘国强 2.高地应力断层带超大断面隧道施工设计[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 204-212
[8] 袁传保 1 鲁金林 1 陶玉敬 1 宋 章 1 刘国强 2.复杂强震山区跃龙门隧道重大工程地质问题研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 188-195
[9] 袁红运 1,2 陈礼伟 2 刘志强 2.单线铁路隧道衬砌纵向裂缝病害综合评价方法[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 208-216
[10] 路军富 1 张宏鑫 1 裴起帆 2.铁路隧道施工阶段监测等级划分方法及应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(1): 202-208
[11] 张民庆 1 辛维克 1 贾大鹏 1 司景钊 2 王唤龙 3.高压富水深竖井工作面预注浆关键技术参数研究及应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(6): 177-186
[12] 段 炼 1 李永恒 2 伍江航 1.硫酸盐环境大面积腐蚀隧道衬砌结构稳定性评价[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(5): 212-220
[13] 周晓军 1 宁远思 2 杨昌宇 3.矿山法施工双线铁路隧道二次衬砌拱部预制拼装结构的设计与工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 204-217
[14] 李伟林 1 章 光 1 朱应伟 1 胡少华 1,2.不同分岔角的卜型隧道施工通风三维数值模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 158-166
[15] 王明年 1,2 郭晓晗 1,2 倪光斌 3 于 丽 1,2 李春荟 1,2.高海拔铁路隧道火灾烟气CO浓度控制标准讨论[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(3): 40-45
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术