[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :184-    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
深埋软岩隧道围岩力学响应及支护受力特性模型试验研究
(1.四川师范大学工学院,成都 610101;2.四川师范大学公共安全与应急研究院,成都 610066; 3.西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都 610031;4.云南永勐高速公路建设开发有限公司,临沧 677601)
Mechanical Response of Surrounding Rock and Supporting Structure Stress Characteristics in Deep-buried Soft Rock Tunnel: A Model Test Study
(1. Institute of Technology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101; 2. Institute of Public Safety and Emergency, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;4. Yunnan Yongmeng Expressway Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Lincang 677601)
Download: PDF (5947KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 依托滇西地区崇岗公路隧道,对深埋软岩隧道施工过程中围岩力学响应及支护结构受力特性进行模型试验研究,分析隧道三台阶施工过程中,洞周距离开挖界面不同距离处的围岩压力和锚杆轴向应变以及钢拱架轴向应变的变化规律。结果表明:随着开挖的进行,各测点围岩压力呈现“累积—释放—稳定”的变化趋势,拱顶和拱肩围岩压力释放迅速且幅度大,拱腰和拱脚围岩压力释放平缓且幅度小;随着距离开挖界面越远,拱顶和拱肩围岩压力变化分为显著释放区、缓慢释放区、相对稳定区,显著释放区距离开挖边界约0.55倍洞径;锚杆除拱顶浅部测点外,各测点均受拉,且拉应变小于锚杆相似材料屈服应变,最不利位置出现在拱肩部位;钢拱架以受压为主,拱肩压应变最大,但均未达到钢拱架相似材料屈服强度,未出现弯折等不利现象,支护结构安全。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词深埋软岩隧道   围岩力学响应   支护结构   受力特性     
Abstract: Based on the Chonggang Highway Tunnel in western Yunnan, this study conducts model tests on the me? chanical response of the surrounding rock and the stress characteristics of the supporting structure during the construction of a deep-buried soft rock tunnel. It analyzes the variation laws of surrounding rock pressure, anchor bolt axial strain, and steel arch axial strain at different distances from the excavation boundary during the three-bench construction of the tunnel. The results show that, as excavation progresses, the surrounding rock pressure at each measurement point exhibits a trend of "accumulation—release—stabilization". The surrounding rock pressure at the vault and shoulder is released quickly and significantly, while the pressure at the waist and foot is released slowly and slightly. As the distance from the excavation boundary increases, the surrounding rock pressure at the vault and shoulder can be divided into significant release zone, slow release zone, and relatively stable zone, with the signifi? cant release zone being about 0.55 times the tunnel diameter from the excavation boundary. Except for the shallow measurement point at the vault, all anchor bolt measurment points are under tension, with tensile strain less than the yield strain of the anchor bolt similar material, and the most unfavorable position is at the shoulder. The steel arch is mainly under compression, with the maximum compressive strain at the shoulder, but none reaches the yield strength of the steel arch similar material, and no adverse phenomena such as bending occur, indicating the safety of the supporting structure.
KeywordsDeep-buried soft rock tunnel,   Surrounding rock mechanical response,   Supporting structure,   Stress charac? teristics     
基金资助:云南省交通运输厅科技创新及示范项目(2021-94);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504901);四川师范大学教学改革项目(C20210417XKC).
作者简介: 疏梓宸(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面研究,E-mail:1195428536@qq.com. 通讯作者:刘 阳(1993-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾的教学和研究,E-mail: ly@sicnu.edu.cn.
引用本文:   
.深埋软岩隧道围岩力学响应及支护受力特性模型试验研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(3): 184-
.Mechanical Response of Surrounding Rock and Supporting Structure Stress Characteristics in Deep-buried Soft Rock Tunnel: A Model Test Study[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 184-
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I3/184
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 喻 渝 齐 春 杨建民 罗禄森.黄土隧道修建技术进展与展望[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(2): 80-89
[2] 赵 勇1 王明年2,3 于 丽2,3 张 霄2,3.中国隧道支护结构设计理论及方法发展与展望[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(2): 28-42
[3] 赵大能 1 王 毅 2 任志华 3.考虑断层错动-地震动共同作用的隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 95-105
[4] 孙会彬 1 张建立 2 杨惠翔 1 杨 辉 2 王 雷 3 魏 君 2 蔺维南 3.隧道钢管混凝土复合支护结构承载特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(2): 103-114
[5] 赵森森 张冬梅 黄忠凯.大直径盾构隧道分布式凹凸榫受力特性[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(5): 54-62
[6] 安永林 1 郭晋东 1 周 进 1 胡 伟 1 董晨阳 2 向 晖 2 戴 岭 2.局部超挖汇水下隧道支护结构受力特性[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(5): 91-98
[7] 韩 超 1 高一民 2 周广杰1 张 磊 1 柳 献 2.超大截面顶升立管受力特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(5): 125-135
[8] 杨 娟 1,2,3 杨其新 2,3 邱品茗 2,.基于CSL隧道支护结构的喷膜防水层黏结性能试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 104-110
[9] 潘伟强 1 焦伯昌 2 柳 献 2 曾 华 3 吉茂杰 3.深埋大断面钢结构顶管接触压力及受力特性现场试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(5): 104-113
[10] 马 莉 1 王起才 1 李 盛 1 刘亚朋 2 宁贵霞 1 韩国强 1.沟槽式高填拱形明洞力学特性及其影响因素分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(6): 133-141
[11] 马 莉 1 刘亚朋 2 李 盛 3,4 吕文达 5 谢 超 3,4 代金鹏 3,4.不同减载措施下高填黄土拱形明洞结构受力研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 75-84
[12] 陶伟明 1 李化云 2 张志强 2 郭永发 3.浅埋膨胀土隧道围岩抗剪强度与支护结构受力特征关系研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 36-43
[13] 赵立财 1,2 余建星 1.长大隧道斜井快速掘进设计方案优化及工期测算[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 50-57
[14] 王可意 1 徐东强 2 孙晓杉 2.Ⅲ1级围岩三车道公路隧道仰拱设置问题研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(2): 103-109
[15] 陈一鑫 1 崔根群 2 宋 林 3.多心圆拱隧道支护结构内力反演分析的理论研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(1): 85-91
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术