[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (6) :162-717    DOI:
数值分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
基于水压特征的岩溶隧道排水方案研究
(1.西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养 全国重点实验室,成都 610031;3. 中铁十一局集团有限公司,武汉 430061)
Study on Drainage Schemes for Karst Tunnels Based on Hydraulic Pressure Characteristics
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University , Chengdu 610031; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 3. China Railway 11th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430061)
Download: PDF (7820KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要  在役岩溶隧道衬砌承受的水压与排水设计方案密切相关。以渝昆高铁中梁山隧道为依托工程,在山岭隧道通用排水设计方案的基础上设计3种改进的排水方案,将岩溶地层等效为均质渗流地层,采用三维数值模拟方法研究3种排水方案条件下隧道衬砌水压分布规律,并对岩溶隧道衬砌水压进行实测。结果表明:(1)对于岩溶弱发育隧道,正常排水时,隧道衬砌拱顶及拱腰水压可大幅度折减,但是隧道衬砌边墙、墙脚及仰拱仍然承受水压;(2)沿隧道纵向,衬砌各测线的水压均呈“M”型分布,在环向排水管处水压最低,在两个环向排水盲管之间的水压较高;(3)在隧道横断面衬砌仰拱水压折减效果方面,中心水沟落底的效果最好,其次是仰拱增加泄水孔及三通管方案,仅在仰拱增加三通管的方案排水效果最差;(4)综合考虑水压折减效果及施工质量,推荐中梁山隧道岩溶弱发育段采用仰拱设环向排水盲管同时在仰拱和墙脚增加泄水孔方案;(5)衬砌仰拱水压监测结果显示,受地表降雨影响岩溶隧道衬砌水压具有明显的波动性 ,实测仰拱水压及分布与数值模拟结果接近,验证了推荐排水方案的有效性。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵东平1
2 和 琦1 杜 卿3 张 文3
关键词岩溶隧道   排水方案   衬砌水压分布   水压监测     
Abstract: The water pressure on the lining of in-service karst tunnels is closely related to the drainage design scheme. Based on the Zhongliangshan Tunnel on the Chongqing-Kunming High-Speed Railway, three improved drainage schemes were designed on the basis of the general drainage design scheme for mountain tunnels. Treating the karst strata as equivalent homogeneous seepage strata, a three-dimensional numerical simulation was conducted to analyze the water pressure distribution patterns on tunnel lining under the three schemes. Field measurements of water pressure were also performed. The results reveal the following: (1) For weakly developed karst tunnels, under normal drainage conditions, water pressure at the crown and haunch of the tunnel lining can be significantly reduced, but the sidewall, wall-foot, and invert arch still bear substantial water pressure; (2) Along the longitudinal direction of the tunnel, the water pressure on all measuring lines of the lining exhibits an "M"-shaped distribution,with the lowest pressure at the circumferential drainage pipes and higher pressure between two circumferential drainage blind pipes; (3) In terms of reducing water pressure on the invert arch, the scheme with a bottomed central drainage ditch is the most effective, followed by the scheme with additional dense drainage holes in the invert arch, while the scheme with only circumferential drainage blind pipes in the invert arch performs the worst; (4) Considering both water pressure reduction effectiveness and construction quality, it is recommended that the weakly developed karst sections of the Zhongliangshan Tunnel adopt a scheme with circumferential drainage blind pipes in the invert arch and additional drainage holes in the invert arch and wall-foot; (5) Monitoring results of water pressure on invert arch show significant fluctuations influenced by surface rainfall. The measured water pressure and distribution on invert arch closely match the numerical simulation results, validating the effectiveness of the recommended drainage scheme.
KeywordsKarst tunnel,   Drainage scheme,   Water pressure distribution on lining,   Water pressure monitoring     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金(U2034205).
作者简介: 赵东平(1979-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程研究,E-mail:704215958@qq.com.
引用本文:   
赵东平1, 2 和 琦1 杜 卿3 张 文3 .基于水压特征的岩溶隧道排水方案研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(6): 162-717
ZHAO Dongping1, 2 HE Qi1 DU Qing3 ZHANG Wen3 .Study on Drainage Schemes for Karst Tunnels Based on Hydraulic Pressure Characteristics[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(6): 162-717
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I6/162
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 王圣涛1 张俊儒2 彭 波1 燕 波3.拱隧一体结构跨越巨型溶洞段处治技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 263-273
[2] 陈仲达 1 林 志 2 陈 相 2 杨红运 2 陆原恩 3 赵益鑫 2.基于非线性渗流模型的管道型岩溶隧道突水机理研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 149-155
[3] 张俊锋 1 李 强 2 史永跃 2 吴 磊 2.西南某隧道岩溶水发育规律及涌水量预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(2): 14-21
[4] 洪英维 1,2 钱夏清 3 李俊辉 3 杨恒卫 4 张 鹏 3.疏通岩溶隧道排水系统堵塞的清洗溶剂效能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(6): 160-170
[5] 向道银 1 王明慧 1 朱建国 2 刘大琳 2 张 桥 1.郑万铁路重庆段岩溶隧道平行导坑快速施工关键技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(4): 194-200
[6] 洪英维 1,2.疏通岩溶隧道排水系统堵塞的清洗溶剂对结构的无损性测评[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(4): 219-
[7] 杨润霞.雷达图法在复杂地质下岩溶隧道风险评估中的应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 125-129
[8] 张 凯 1 陈寿根 2 霍晓龙 3 谭信荣 4.岩溶地区隧道涌水风险的可拓评价模型及应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[9] 李 好.大断面岩溶隧道贯通段地质情况的无线电波透视试验探测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[10] 秦 成 1,2 张玉东 2 李 好 2 邓春为 2.多尺度综合探测技术在岩溶隧道突水成因判定中的应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(2): 140-145
[11] 袁永才 高成路 王 旌 朱宇泽 张 猛.岩溶隧道突涌水致灾构造与前兆信息判识技术探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(1): 36-44
[12] 薛亚东 1,2 李硕标 3 丁文强 1,2 方 超 4.隐伏溶洞对隧道施工安全影响的风险评估体系[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017,54(4): 41-47
[13] 师 海 1 白明洲 1, 2 许兆义 1 田 岗.基于突变理论的岩溶隧道与隐伏溶洞安全距离分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016,53(4): 61-69
[14] 袁永才, 李术才, 李利平, 石少帅, 周宗青, 雷霆.岩溶隧道施工过程中大型溶洞的综合预报及治理方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015,52(2): 192-197
[15] 邹育麟, 何, 川, 何, 聪, 张, 政, 汪, 波.重庆岩溶地区季节性富水营运隧道渗漏水病害特征及其成因机制分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2014,51(4): 18-27
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术