Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (1) :70-76    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
A Study of Stress Evolution During Construction of Extra-Large Cross Section Railway Tunnels
(Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to study the stress evolution of a rock mass during tunnel construction, the curve, reflecting the three-dimensional stress of the rock mass, was utilized in combination with the Mohr-Coulomb criteria to demonstrate the stress path and define the safety factor. In this paper, using the Wumenshan Tunnel 2 as an example, FLAC3D software is applied to analyze the evolution of the stress path and safety factor during construction of an extra-large cross section railway tunnel. Results show that during construction of extra-large cross section railway tunnels, the following are true: the evolution of the stress path and safety factor of the rock mass at both sides of the tunnel acts with a certain degree of symmetry during partial construction; while advanced to monitoring points spaced at 3m, the stress value and safety factor at the monitoring points are sharply decreased due to excavation and the deflection of the principal stress takes place; after the completion of the primary support, the stress value and safety factor are certainly increased and tend to be stable; earlier installation of all primary supports is useful to control the evolution of rock stress; the safety factor at the sidewalls is less than 1.0 for a long time, to which more attention shall be paid; when the working face passes through each monitoring point, the safety factor measured at each monitoring point tends to be stable and more than 1.0, which shows the tunnel construction is safe based on this computation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHAO
Bin
Zhang-Hui-Jian
Chou-Wen-Ge
Keywords Tunnel construction   Stress path   FLAC3D software   Safety factor     
Abstract: In order to study the stress evolution of a rock mass during tunnel construction, the curve, reflecting the three-dimensional stress of the rock mass, was utilized in combination with the Mohr-Coulomb criteria to demonstrate the stress path and define the safety factor. In this paper, using the Wumenshan Tunnel 2 as an example, FLAC3D software is applied to analyze the evolution of the stress path and safety factor during construction of an extra-large cross section railway tunnel. Results show that during construction of extra-large cross section railway tunnels, the following are true: the evolution of the stress path and safety factor of the rock mass at both sides of the tunnel acts with a certain degree of symmetry during partial construction; while advanced to monitoring points spaced at 3m, the stress value and safety factor at the monitoring points are sharply decreased due to excavation and the deflection of the principal stress takes place; after the completion of the primary support, the stress value and safety factor are certainly increased and tend to be stable; earlier installation of all primary supports is useful to control the evolution of rock stress; the safety factor at the sidewalls is less than 1.0 for a long time, to which more attention shall be paid; when the working face passes through each monitoring point, the safety factor measured at each monitoring point tends to be stable and more than 1.0, which shows the tunnel construction is safe based on this computation.
Keywords Tunnel construction,   Stress path,   FLAC3D software,   Safety factor     
Cite this article:   
ZHAO , Bin, Zhang-Hui-Jian etc .A Study of Stress Evolution During Construction of Extra-Large Cross Section Railway Tunnels [J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(1): 70-76
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I1/70
 
No references of article
[1] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[2] LI Yanzong ZHAO Shuang.Analysis on Construction Schemes and Deformation of Multi-layer Support Structure for a Soft Rock Tunnel under High Geostress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(3): 161-165
[3] LIU Hao1 ZHANG Huijian2,3 JIANG Zuoyang 2,3 LI Shuang4.Analysis Model of Multi-layer Lining against Water Pressure and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(2): 70-77
[4] QIU Chenyu1,4 ZHENG Yingren1 ZHANG Yantao2 TAN Wanpeng3 ZHAO Sangyi1.Discussion on Classification Method and Criterion for the Deep-buried and Shallow-buried Rock Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 14-21
[5] ZHU Qinghua1 HUANG Jianfeng2 HE Yong3 SHAO Yong3.Analysis of the Stability of River-crossing Pipelines against Uplift Based on the Strength Reduction Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 94-98
[6] DING Yanping1,2,3 XU Linsheng1,2.Study on Mechanical Characteristics and Safety of Deep-buried Highway Tunnel Lining under External Water Pressur[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(6): 101-107
[7] ZHANG Junru1 OU Xiaoqiang1,2 ZHENG Qiang1 GONG Yanfeng3.On Safety in Dismantling Temporary Strut of Super-large Tunnels with Double-layer Primary Support[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(6): 108-116
[8] .[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 106-114
[9] .Effect of Seismic Parameters on the Safety Factor for an Underground Cavern[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(3): 98-105
[10] QU Haobo1,2 LI Lin2.Preliminary Analysis of Causes of Closing Type Blockage Disasters during Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(2): 51-55
[11] ZHANG Tao.Rapid Construction Technique for a Large Upper-Section of the Tianping Tunnel in Soft Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(6): 203-209
[12] .Analysis of the Reliability of Advanced Geological Prediction during TunnelConstruction Based on the Attribute Recognition Theory[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(4): 48-55
[13] .Strata Disturbance Influenced by Soil Mechanical Parameters Varying with Dynamic Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(4): 131-136
[14] SHANG Yonghui1,2 SHANG Li2 FANG Qiancheng2 ZHANG Bo3 ZHAO Ying2.Mean and Non-Mean Models for the Safety Evaluation of Surrounding Rock Based on Shield Driving under a Flyover Structure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(2): 121-128
[15] ZHANG Chengping ZHANG Xu FENG Gang ZHANG Dingli.Influence of Insufficient Lining Thickness on the Safety of a Tunnel Structure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(2): 137-143
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY