Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (5) :91-98    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Computation of Surrounding Rock Pressure of Super Large Span and Flat Underground Cavern Based on Process Load Concept
(Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092)
Download: PDF (2909KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The computation of surrounding rock pressure of 60 m span flat underground cavern is beyond the scope of the existing calculating methods. The empirical formulas and influencing factors are compared and analyzed. Based on Protodyakonov formula, the concept of process load and construction method, the cross section of cavern with super large span is divided into several small span caverns, and the surrounding rock pressure of super large span flat underground caverns is obtained considering the construction process. The relationship between the settlement of crown and the distance from the excavation face, the range and its maximum value of ground surface settlement caused by the advance of excavation are obtained by three-dimensional numerical simulation using finite difference method. Taking the εz of 0.000 25 as the critical strain, the loose scope and pressure load of surrounding rock are obtained. By comparing the calculation results of the three methods(one-cycle construction, process load and numerical calculation) it can be seen that the pressure value of surrounding rock obtained by applying the existing empirical formula directly is larger than the process load value and the numerical calculation result, while the numerical calculation result is similar to the process load value. Therefore, the process load has certain reference signifi? cance for the calculation of the surrounding rock pressure of the super large span flat underground cavern.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Yulong YAN Zhiguo
KeywordsSuper-large span   Flat cavern   Surrounding rock pressure   Process load   Numerical simulation   Col? lapse area     
Abstract: The computation of surrounding rock pressure of 60 m span flat underground cavern is beyond the scope of the existing calculating methods. The empirical formulas and influencing factors are compared and analyzed. Based on Protodyakonov formula, the concept of process load and construction method, the cross section of cavern with super large span is divided into several small span caverns, and the surrounding rock pressure of super large span flat underground caverns is obtained considering the construction process. The relationship between the settlement of crown and the distance from the excavation face, the range and its maximum value of ground surface settlement caused by the advance of excavation are obtained by three-dimensional numerical simulation using finite difference method. Taking the εz of 0.000 25 as the critical strain, the loose scope and pressure load of surrounding rock are obtained. By comparing the calculation results of the three methods(one-cycle construction, process load and numerical calculation) it can be seen that the pressure value of surrounding rock obtained by applying the existing empirical formula directly is larger than the process load value and the numerical calculation result, while the numerical calculation result is similar to the process load value. Therefore, the process load has certain reference signifi? cance for the calculation of the surrounding rock pressure of the super large span flat underground cavern.
KeywordsSuper-large span,   Flat cavern,   Surrounding rock pressure,   Process load,   Numerical simulation,   Col? lapse area     
Cite this article:   
SUN Yulong YAN Zhiguo .Study on Computation of Surrounding Rock Pressure of Super Large Span and Flat Underground Cavern Based on Process Load Concept[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(5): 91-98
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2020/V57/I5/91
 
No references of article
[1] YAN Jian1,2 WEI Yanqing3 HE Chuan1 ZHOU Zihan1 GOU Hao1.Hot-freeze Link Technology and Its Application in Snow Melting and Deicing of Tunnel Portal Section of Sichuan-Tibet Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 1-9
[2] YAN Xidong1 GAO Jun1 HAN Fei2 LI Zheng1.Risk Evaluation of the Tunnel Passing through Active Fault Zone and Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 10-22
[3] WANG Shuaishuai1,2 CHEN Guizhou2 GUO Chun2 BAI Yonghou3.On Power Performances of Tunnel Construction Machinery at High-altitude Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 23-29
[4] GONG Chenjie1 YANG Junsheng1 FU Jinyang1, 2.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Segment Cracking of LargeDiameter River-Crossing Shield Tunnelling in Composite Rock Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[5] ZHANG Xin.Research on Application of Random Source Model Based New Microtremor Survey Technology to Shield Tunnelling in Upper Soft and Lower Hard Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 43-50
[6] HUANG Zhongkai1 ZHANG Dongmei1,2.Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of the Shallow-buried Shield Tunnel in Soft Soil Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 51-60
[7] JIANG Heng1 LIU Xuezeng2 ZHU Hehua1.Research on Crack Identification of Highway Tunnel Linings Based on Data Obtained from the Testing Vehicle[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 61-65
[8] TIAN Chongming1 YE Fei1 SONG Guifeng2 WANG Qinglong2 ZHAO Meng1.On Mechanism of Crystal Blockage of Tunnel Drainage System and Preventive Countermeasures[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 66-76
[9] LIU Sicong1 ZHAO Chengqiao2 MA Chenxiao1 PENG Fangle.Discussion on Connection Problems of Underground Space in Early CBD from the Perspective of Urban Renewal ——A Case of Lujiazui CBD[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 77-83
[10] WANG Zhilong1,2 ZHOU Renqiang3 YANG Nie1,2 WANG Mingnian1,2 LIU Dagang1,2.Hoek-Brown Criterion Based Calculation Method of Rock Resistant Coefficient in Tunnelling and Its Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 84-90
[11] ZHOU Zhong CHEN Yun MIAO Linwu. Study of Equivalent Layered Method Based Prediction Model for Deformations Caused by Construction of New Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 99-103
[12] LV Xilin1,2 ZHAO Yucheng1,2 CAI Jiantao3.Numerical Simulation of Ground Subsidence Induced by Shield Tunnel Construction Disturbance in Water-rich Sandy Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 104-109
[13] CHEN Weijie1 SU Dong1,2 CHEN Xiangsheng1,2 PANG Xiaochao2,3 LEI Guoping1,2.Study on the Influence of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction and Lateral Pressure on Deformation of the Shield Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 110-115
[14] LV Jingfu1 DU Jiangmei1 LUO Zejun2,3 ZHANG Jinjiang1 MIU Yabiao1.Research on the Stability and Supporting Parameters of High-Steep Slope of Yankou Highway Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 116-124
[15] WANG Zhichao XIE Yuan XIE Yongli.Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Innovative Support System in Loess Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 125-135
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY