Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2025, Vol. 62 Issue (1) :170-182    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Analysis of the Impact of the Three Pipe Jacking Over-crossing Construction on Existing Tunnel and Surface Deformation
(1. China Railway Tunnel Group No.2 Engineering Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University,Changsha 410075)
Download: PDF (8983KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Based on the new three pipe jacking utility tunnel crossing over existing metro tunnel in Nanchang City, a three-dimensional numerical model was established to study the deformation of the existing tunnel and ground surface under four construction sequences: first the middle, then both sides; first both sides, then the middle; right to left; and simultaneous construction of the three pipe jacking. The optimal construction sequence was selected by comparing the impact of these construction sequences on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The study further investigates the effect of different grouting pressures, face pressures, and anti-floating counterweights on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. Finally, field monitoring was conducted to verify the accuracy of the simulation results and reveal the displacement and deformation patterns of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The results show that: (1) The two-sides-first construction sequence is the optimal one, resulting in the least surface settlement, vertical tunnel displacement, and horizontal tunnel displacement, reducing them by 18.2%, 30.7%, and 23.8%, respectively, compared to the maximum values; (2) Increasing grouting pressure can suppress the development of surface settlement and tunnel displacement. Increasing face pressure can re? duce surface settlement but will increase tunnel displacement. The ratio of grouting pressure to vertical soil pressure should be controlled between 2.5 and 3.8, and the ratio of working face pressure to lateral soil pressure should be controlled between 1.88 and 2.5; (3) Applying anti-floating counterweights can suppress tunnel displacement, causing the floating of the tunnel vault to rise to a maximum value before decreasing. The reduction in displacement for counter weight ratios of 0.5 and 1 is 17% and 30%, respectively; (4) During the successive pipe jacking process, the surface settlement, settlement trough width, and tunnel displacement increase with each construction step. Due to the isolation effect, the displacement of the metro's downward line is smaller than that of the upward line; (5) Field monitoring showed a maximum surface settlement of 13.5 mm, with the maximum vertical displacement at the tunnel vault, the maximum vertical displacement at the track bed, and the maximum horizontal displacement at the tunnel waist being 1.5 mm, 1.1 mm, and 0.8 mm, respectively, all within safe limits.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Wang1 PENG Yanfeng1 LIU Weizheng2 ZHANG Siyu2 CHEN Changhui1
KeywordsMultiple pipe jacking   Construction parameters   Construction sequence   Tunnel deformation   Numerical simulation   Field monitoring     
Abstract: Based on the new three pipe jacking utility tunnel crossing over existing metro tunnel in Nanchang City, a three-dimensional numerical model was established to study the deformation of the existing tunnel and ground surface under four construction sequences: first the middle, then both sides; first both sides, then the middle; right to left; and simultaneous construction of the three pipe jacking. The optimal construction sequence was selected by comparing the impact of these construction sequences on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The study further investigates the effect of different grouting pressures, face pressures, and anti-floating counterweights on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. Finally, field monitoring was conducted to verify the accuracy of the simulation results and reveal the displacement and deformation patterns of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The results show that: (1) The two-sides-first construction sequence is the optimal one, resulting in the least surface settlement, vertical tunnel displacement, and horizontal tunnel displacement, reducing them by 18.2%, 30.7%, and 23.8%, respectively, compared to the maximum values; (2) Increasing grouting pressure can suppress the development of surface settlement and tunnel displacement. Increasing face pressure can re? duce surface settlement but will increase tunnel displacement. The ratio of grouting pressure to vertical soil pressure should be controlled between 2.5 and 3.8, and the ratio of working face pressure to lateral soil pressure should be controlled between 1.88 and 2.5; (3) Applying anti-floating counterweights can suppress tunnel displacement, causing the floating of the tunnel vault to rise to a maximum value before decreasing. The reduction in displacement for counter weight ratios of 0.5 and 1 is 17% and 30%, respectively; (4) During the successive pipe jacking process, the surface settlement, settlement trough width, and tunnel displacement increase with each construction step. Due to the isolation effect, the displacement of the metro's downward line is smaller than that of the upward line; (5) Field monitoring showed a maximum surface settlement of 13.5 mm, with the maximum vertical displacement at the tunnel vault, the maximum vertical displacement at the track bed, and the maximum horizontal displacement at the tunnel waist being 1.5 mm, 1.1 mm, and 0.8 mm, respectively, all within safe limits.
KeywordsMultiple pipe jacking,   Construction parameters,   Construction sequence,   Tunnel deformation,   Numerical simulation,   Field monitoring     
Cite this article:   
CHEN Wang1 PENG Yanfeng1 LIU Weizheng2 ZHANG Siyu2 CHEN Changhui1 .Analysis of the Impact of the Three Pipe Jacking Over-crossing Construction on Existing Tunnel and Surface Deformation[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,V62(1): 170-182
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2025/V62/I1/170
 
No references of article
[1] YI Zhuangpeng WANG Shen'ao TANG Xinchao CHEN Zhiwei.Study on the Vortex-induced Vibration Characteristics of Multi-lane Wide-section Submerged Floating Tunnels Based on CFD[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 92-102
[2] MU Haixing1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 YANG Shaoyi1 ZHANG Liangliang2.Study on the Mechanical Behavior and Failure Characteristics of Ultra-large Diameter Shield Tunnel Segment Structures[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 125-134
[3] WAN Dongxing1 ZHANG Di2 SUN Feng2 PAN Chenxin3 ZHU Zhenwei1 XU Xiaofeng1 HE Chao1 SHEN Tuqi1.Study on the Mechanical Response of Tunnel Segment Structures in Ultra-large Diameter Shallow-buried Shield Tunnels during Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 135-146
[4] ZHANG Chengyou1 WANG Bo1 DU Zehao1 GAO Junhan1 TAN Lihao2.Analysis of the Suitability of Different Anchor Bolt Support Systems for Rockburst Mitigation and Optimization of Anchor Bolt Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 64-73
[5] KUANG Liang1 SU Wei1 TAO Weiming1 TIAN Siming2 SHEN Yusheng3 LI Xu2 WANG Huiwu1.Study on the Impact Zoning and Fortification Range of Tunnel Structures Crossing Strike-slip Faults[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 45-54
[6] QIU Wei1 ZENG Qingcheng1 OUYANG Jian1 MU Haixing2 GUO Wenqi2 FENG Kun2 HU Dawei3.Study on Shear Mechanical Performances of Circumferential Mortise and Tenon Joints with Oblique Bolts in Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 129-138
[7] XUE Qingsong.Deformation Distribution Characteristics and Control Measures of Large-section Rectangular Pipe Jacking Over-crossing Metro Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(6): 148-161
[8] WANG Shengtao1 ZHANG Junru2 PENG Bo1 YAN Bo3.Research on Treatment Technology for Arch Bridge-tunnel Integrated Structure Spanning a Large Karst Cave Section[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 263-273
[9] LI Dong1 ZHOU Yue2 WANG Feng3 LI Weipeng4 YE Jiexian5 CAO Xiong1 BAI Zhenchao5.Numerical Simulation of Variable Frequency Seepage Flow in Tunnel Surrounding Rock Joint Fractures[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 146-155
[10] MA Jianjun1,4 TANG Rong1 LIU Cong2 HUANG Weizhen1 LIN Yuexiang3.Study on the Mechanical Properties of Sandstone and Stability of Under-river Tunnels under Creep-permeability Coupling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 156-166
[11] WANG Yuanye1 DING Wenqi1,2 YANG Jinjing3 QIAO Yafei1,2 DING Wenyun3.Study on the Disturbance Patterns of Roadheader Construction of Large-section Railway Tunnel Under-crossing Existing Buildings in Karst Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 274-284
[12] LV Linhai1,2,3 JIANG Mingjie1,2 XIE Zhongming1,2 HUANG Zhonghui4 WANG Binghua3 MEI Guoxiong5.Calculation Method for Underlying Tunnel Deformation Induced by Foundation Pit Excavation Based on Layered Mindlin Solution[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 95-104
[13] LIU Xiaohui1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 LU Xuanyi1 PENG Changsheng2 LI Jiaoyang2.Study on the Influence of Construction Methods of Internal Structures on Longitudinal Mechanical Characteristics of Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 151-160
[14] ZHU Meiheng1 CHEN Sirui2 HUANG Zhongkai2 LI Yongbo1 ZHANG Wuyu3 ZHANG Dongmei2.Study on the Deformation Law of Large-diameter Fully Prefabricated Assembled Shield Tunnels under Ground Surcharge[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 161-171
[15] SU Peidong LU Xinghao LI Yougui QIU Peng AN Xingling.Study on Multi-factors Affecting Construction Ventilation in Hydraulic Tunnels with Gas in Tingzikou Irrigation Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 180-191
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY