[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :11-19    DOI:
“隧道及地下工程低碳理论及技术应用”专题 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
越江盾构隧道全寿命期碳排放特征与减排途径研究
(1. 上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240; 2. 上海城建城市运营(集团)有限公司,上海 200023)
Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Approaches in the Full Life Cycle of River-crossing Shield Tunnels
(1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240; 2. Shanghai Urban Construction and Operation (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200023)
Download: PDF (2990KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 越江隧道是城市网络中的重要交通基础设施,也是城市交通碳排放主要来源之一,对越江隧道的碳排放计量、评估与减排机制进行研究十分必要。首先确定越江隧道全寿命期碳排放计量边界和清单,分为物化阶段和运维阶段两部分。基于清单分析,建立以碳排放因子法为基础的越江盾构隧道全寿命期碳排放计量模型,并系统分析越江隧道全寿命期与工程活动的对应关系,提出绿色技术驱动的越江隧道碳减排效应估算流程,以碳减排效应系数表征绿色技术的碳排放效果。研究表明:国内外对各类绿色技术的碳减排效应量化研究严重不足;在物化阶段,盾构隧道单位碳排放量随直径的增大而增大,在材料和结构设计不发生变革的情况下,物化阶段碳减排潜力有限;在运维阶段,机电设施的碳排放量与物化阶段碳排放量基本相当,从全寿命期考虑,运维阶段碳减排潜力及可控性更大。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
艾 青1 李一轩1 朱俊易2
关键词越江盾构隧道   碳排放   绿色技术   减排效应评估     
Abstract: The river-crossing tunnel is an important traffic infrastructure in the urban traffic network and one of the main sources of carbon emission in urban traffic, so it is necessary to investigate carbon emission measurement and assessment of river-crossing tunnels and emission reduction mechanism. The first step is to establish the carbon emission measurement boundary and list for the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels. The life cycle is divided into two parts, i.e. materialization stage and O&M stage. Based on the list analysis, the carbon emission measurement model for the full life cycle of river-crossing shield tunnels is created based on the carbon emission factor method,the correlation between the full life cycle of river-crossing tunnels and the engineering activities is systematically analyzed, and the river-crossing tunnel carbon emission reduction effect estimation process driven by green technologies is devised. The carbon emission result is represented by using the carbon emission reduction effect coefficient. As the study indicates: there is severe lack of quantitative research into the carbon emission reduction effect of various green technologies both at home and abroad. In the materialization stage, the unit carbon emission of shield tunnel increases as the tunnel diameter increases, and there is only limited potential of carbon emission reduction as long as the material and structural design remain unchanged. In the O&M stage, the carbon emission of mechanical and electrical installations is largely equivalent to the carbon emission in the materialization stage. From the aspect of full life cycle, the O&M stage has greater potential of carbon emission reduction and better controllability.
KeywordsRiver-crossing shield tunnels,   Carbon emission,   Green technologies,   Emission reduction effect assess? ment     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(51808336).
作者简介: 艾 青(1989-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道智能维护理论与技术方面的研究和教学工作,E-mail: ai.qing@sjtu.edu.cn. 通讯作者:朱俊易(1984-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事隧道运营维护方面的工作,E-mail:flourist@126.com.
引用本文:   
艾 青1 李一轩1 朱俊易2 .越江盾构隧道全寿命期碳排放特征与减排途径研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2023,V60(6): 11-19
AI Qing1 LI Yixuan1 ZHU Junyi2 .Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Approaches in the Full Life Cycle of River-crossing Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 11-19
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2023/V60/I6/11
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 陈湘生1,2,3 陈坤阳1,2,3 邱 桐1,2,3 王 雷1,2,3 何秋凤1,2,3 赖亚妮1,2,3陈武雄4 付艳斌1,2,3.城市轨道交通基础设施隐含碳排放研究综述[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(4): 1-13
[2] 崔光耀1 戴艾蒙1 麻建飞2 宁茂权3,4.矩形顶管隧道施工碳排放计算方法及影响因素研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(4): 126-134
[3] 李嘉豪1 习明星2 沈 奕1 刘 安2 朱合华.基于SimaPro的公路隧道建造阶段碳排放计算与构成评估[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 20-28
[4] 曾弘锐1,2 孙文昊3 何 卫3 郭亚林1,2 郭 春1,2.基于机器学习的铁路隧道施工碳排放预测模型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[5] 张小英1 刘 陶2 沈 奕2 刘 安3.照明对公路隧道全寿命期碳排放的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 40-47
[6] 尹 严 包卫星 卢汉青 张智勇 车博文 潘振华 林旭辉.天山胜利隧道隧址区污水处理全过程碳排放特征和碳减排模式研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 58-67
[7] 刘世昊1 宋战平1,2,3 徐磊磊4 夏震昭5 王军保1,2,3.基于SVM-MAUT的隧道低碳施工方案优选[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 68-79
[8] 郭亚林 1,2 孙文昊 3 许洪伟 3 何 卫 3 陈 政 1,2 郭 春 1,2.地铁隧道盾构及钻爆法施工碳排放强度对比[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 14-23
[9] 郭 春 1,2 郭亚林 1,2 陈 政 1,2.交通隧道工程碳排放核算及研究进展分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(1): 1-10
[10] 龚琛杰 1 阳军生 1 傅金阳 1, 2.复合岩层大直径越江盾构隧道管片施工裂损特征及影响因素分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[11] 李乔松1 白云1 李林2.盾构隧道建造阶段低碳化影响因子与措施研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015,52(3): 1-7
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术