[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (6) :63-69    DOI:
研究与探讨 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
高填黄土矩形、拱形明洞减载结构土压力差异性规律研究
(1兰州工业学院土木工程学院,兰州 730050 ;2兰州交通大学土木工程学院,兰州 730070)
Study on Earth Pressure Difference Law of Load Relieving Structure of the Rectangular and Arched High-filled Loess Open Cut Tunnels
(1 College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Technology, Lanzhou 730050; 2 College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070)
Download: PDF (3206KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 高填明洞会使结构受力增加,影响结构安全。文章通过模型试验、数值模拟手段,考虑EPS减载、结构截面形式及其基础刚度,研究了明洞洞顶土压力、土体位移随填土高度的变化规律。结果表明,高填明洞减载结构洞顶土压力随填土高度的变化呈非线性变化,拱形截面减载效果优于矩形截面,柔性基础明洞减载效果优于刚性基础;矩形截面从洞顶中心点到两侧的土压力呈现先增大后减小、最后趋于稳定的趋势,在明洞两侧边界处出现最大值,EPS减载和柔性基础会使最大峰值与洞顶中心点数值的差距减小;拱形截面明洞洞顶同一平面竖向土压力呈现先减小、最后趋于稳定的趋势,最大值出现在明洞洞顶中心点。矩形截面明洞洞顶同一平面土体沉降曲线由减载前的“双V”型变化为减载后的“U”型。随后,对试验过程进行数值模拟分析,两者计算结果平均误差为11.0%,验证了试验数据的正确性及计算参数的合理性。最后,从填土横向应力上探讨了不同截面、基础刚度的明洞减载结构土拱效应的差异。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马 莉 1 李 盛 2 王起才 2 于本田 2 刘亚朋 2 王庆石 2
关键词:   
Abstract: The high-filled open cut tunnel causes larger force applied on the structure and endangers its safety. Considering EPS induced load reduction, section type and foundation stiffness, the change rules of earth pressure and soil displacement on the top of open cut tunnel varying with the filling height are studied by model test and numerical simulation. The results show that the change of earth pressure on top of the load relieving structure of highfilled loess open cut tunnel is of nonlinear with filling height, the open cut tunnel with arched section is better than the rectangular one and the open cut tunnel with flexible foundation is better than that with rigid foundation regarding the load relieving effect; the earth pressure increases at first and decreases later and finally tends to be stable from the center at top to the two sides of open cut tunnel with rectangular section, the peak earth pressure occurs at the boundary of both sides of open cut tunnel, the difference between the peak earth pressure and the earth pressure at the central point of tunnel crown decreases due to the EPS induced load relieving and flexible foundation; the vertical earth pressure decreases at first and tends to be stable from the center to the two sides of open cut tunnel with arched section and the peak earth pressure occurs at the central point of tunnel top. The curve pattern of soil mass settlements at the top of the open cut tunnel with rectangle section changes from the "double V" before load relieving to the "U" distribution after load relieving. A numerical simulation analysis on the test process is conducted, and the average error of the two calculation results is 11.0%, which validates the correctness of the experiment data and the rationality of the calculation parameters. Finally the differences of soil arch effects of the load relieving structures of open cut tunnels with different section types and foundation stiffnesses are discussed in terms of lateral stress of fillings.
KeywordsHigh filling;Open cut tunnel,   Section type;Load relieving;Foundation,   Soil arch effect     
基金资助:基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51668036);甘肃省高等学校科学研究一般项目(2017A-111)
作者简介: 作者简介:马 莉(1982-),女,硕士,讲师,主要从事桥梁与隧道工程方面的研究,E-mail:451906654@qq.com. 通讯作者:李 盛(1982-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事桥梁与隧道方面的研究工作,E-mail:ligwin@126.com.
引用本文:   
马 莉 1 李 盛 2 王起才 2 于本田 2 刘亚朋 2 王庆石 2 .高填黄土矩形、拱形明洞减载结构土压力差异性规律研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2019,V56(6): 63-69
MA Li1 LI Sheng2 WANG Qicai2 YU Bentian2 LIU Yapeng2 WANG Qingshi2 .Study on Earth Pressure Difference Law of Load Relieving Structure of the Rectangular and Arched High-filled Loess Open Cut Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(6): 63-69
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2019/V56/I6/63
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 王明年 1,2 郭晓晗 1,2 崔 鹏 1,2 于 丽 1,2.高海拔大规模铁路隧道群防灾疏散救援工程关键技术探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 1-7
[2] 朱永生 1 李鹏飞 2.Hoek-Brown强度准则研究进展及岩体力学参数取值[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 8-17
[3] 郑余朝 1 张文胜 1 孙克国 1 蔡佳良 1 李 杰 2 冷 彪 1 赵瑞文 2 赵晓勇 3 罗 勇 3.基于离散元强度折减法的大跨隧道稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 18-25
[4] 刘学增 1,2 蔡 鑫 3 丁茂瑞 3 陈福斌 3 邓 枫 3.破碎围岩大跨公路隧道结构健康度评价方法研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 26-35
[5] 陶伟明 1 李化云 2 张志强 2 郭永发 3.浅埋膨胀土隧道围岩抗剪强度与支护结构受力特征关系研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 36-43
[6] 马时强 1,2.软岩大变形条件下围岩变形与围岩压力的关系研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 44-50
[7] 杜 俊 1,2 梅志荣 2 傅立磊 3 陈永照 3.基于强度折减法的浅埋软弱围岩隧道掌子面稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 51-57
[8] 郭成刚 1 郭永发 2 朱孟龙 3 张庆文 3.红层环境下的碳酸盐岩岩溶隧道暗河水文地质调查研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 58-64
[9] 詹显军 裴涛涛 周济兵.基于热力图的地铁车站变形可视化分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 65-69
[10] 蔡亚宁 1 黄清杰 2.盾构隧道钢筋混凝土管片模具相关标准及其质量管理[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 70-75
[11] 严 涛 1 李坤杰 1 秦鹏程 1 陈劲宇 1,2 林 锐 3 左 强 3.明暗挖施工地铁车站下部暗挖隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 76-82
[12] 王 俊 林国进.流变荷载作用下公路隧道二次衬砌开裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 83-90
[13] 林志斌 张勃阳 杨大方.考虑蠕变与渗流作用的软土基坑开挖模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 91-98
[14] 彭 琦.上跨地铁隧道的转换结构基础施工与附加荷载影响分析研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 99-104
[15] 彭 炎 1,2 方 慧 1,2 吕琴音 1,2.隧道反射波层析成像正反演模拟与TRT反演的对比分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(1): 105-114
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术