Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (4) :178-187    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Risk Level Classification Method and Control Measures for Railway Tunnel Floor Heave
(1. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031; 2.State Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster Prevention and Geological Environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059)
Download: PDF (4033KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In recent years, the invert floor heave problem in high-speed railway tunnels has become prominent, which has seriously affected the running speed and safety of trains on the ballastless track. In order to accurately and quantitatively evaluate the risk level of railway tunnel floor heave, a study is conducted on the classification of risk levels and control measures for railway tunnel floor heave during the design and operation stages through investigation and analysis of floor heave deformation of some railway tunnels in China and in combination with the unascertained measure theory and the improved analytic hierarchy process. The research results indicate that, considering these factors such as geological environment, tunnel structural characteristics and floor heave characteristics, a risk level classification indicator system of floor heave including 5 Level I indicators and 11 Level II indicators is determined in the tunnel design stage; another risk level classification indicator system of floor heave including 6 Level I indicators and 15 Level II indicators is determined in the tunnel operation stage; According to the risk degree of rail? way tunnel floor heave defects, the risk levels of railway tunnel floor heave are divided into Level I, II, III and IV.The risk level evaluation method and process of railway tunnel floor heave are established based on the risk level of tunnel floor heave and the influence law of each indicator on floor heave; corresponding integrated control measures are prepared for the floor heave risk levels of railway tunnels during the design and operation stages.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHAO Wanqiang1 LU Junfu2 TANG Yin1 ZHENG Changqing1
KeywordsRailway tunnel   Floor heave   Classification of risk levels   Judgment indicators   Control measures     
Abstract: In recent years, the invert floor heave problem in high-speed railway tunnels has become prominent, which has seriously affected the running speed and safety of trains on the ballastless track. In order to accurately and quantitatively evaluate the risk level of railway tunnel floor heave, a study is conducted on the classification of risk levels and control measures for railway tunnel floor heave during the design and operation stages through investigation and analysis of floor heave deformation of some railway tunnels in China and in combination with the unascertained measure theory and the improved analytic hierarchy process. The research results indicate that, considering these factors such as geological environment, tunnel structural characteristics and floor heave characteristics, a risk level classification indicator system of floor heave including 5 Level I indicators and 11 Level II indicators is determined in the tunnel design stage; another risk level classification indicator system of floor heave including 6 Level I indicators and 15 Level II indicators is determined in the tunnel operation stage; According to the risk degree of rail? way tunnel floor heave defects, the risk levels of railway tunnel floor heave are divided into Level I, II, III and IV.The risk level evaluation method and process of railway tunnel floor heave are established based on the risk level of tunnel floor heave and the influence law of each indicator on floor heave; corresponding integrated control measures are prepared for the floor heave risk levels of railway tunnels during the design and operation stages.
KeywordsRailway tunnel,   Floor heave,   Classification of risk levels,   Judgment indicators,   Control measures     
Cite this article:   
ZHAO Wanqiang1 LU Junfu2 TANG Yin1 ZHENG Changqing1 .Study on Risk Level Classification Method and Control Measures for Railway Tunnel Floor Heave[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(4): 178-187
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I4/178
 
No references of article
[1] FAN Wenhao1,2 XIE Shenghao1,2 ZHOU Feicong1,2 WANG Zhijie1,2 ZHANG Kai3 LUO Yunjian3.A Case Study on Adjacent Impact Zoning and Control Measures for New Double-line Shield Tunnel Undercrossing Existing Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 43-57
[2] DUO Shengjun.Study on Ventilation Technology for Long-distance TBM Construction in Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 222-228
[3] ZHANG Chonghui LIANG Qingguo SUN Weiyu YUE Jianping ZHANG Xingchen.Study on Deformation Characteristics of Tunnel Inverts in Mudstone Considering Rheological Effects[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 116-127
[4] CHEN Xiwu1 QING Weichen1 LIU Guoqiang2.Construction Design for Super-large Section Tunnels in Fault Zone with High Geotress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 204-212
[5] YUAN Chuanbao1 LU Jinlin1 TAO Yujing1 SONG Zhang1 LIU Guoqiang2.Study on Major Engineering Geological Problems of Yuelongmen Tunnel in Mountain Areas Under Complex Strong Earthquake Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 188-195
[6] YUAN Hongyun1,2 CHEN Liwei2 LIU Zhiqiang2.Method for Comprehensive Evaluation of Longitudinal Crack Defect of Lining of Single-track Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 208-216
[7] LU Junfu1 ZHANG Hongxin1 PEI Qifan2.Classification Method of Monitoring Level in Railway Tunnel Construction Phase and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 202-208
[8] ZHANG Minqing1 XIN Weike1 JIA Dapeng1 SI Jingzhao2 WANG Huanlong3.Study and Application of Key Technical Parameters of Pre-grouting in High-pressure Water-rich Deep Shaft Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 177-186
[9] DUAN Lian1 LI Yongheng2 WU Jianghang1.Stability Evaluation for the Lining Structures of Tunnels with Large Corrosion Areas in Sulfate Environment[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(5): 212-220
[10] ZHOU Xiaojun1 NING Yuansi2 YANG Changyu3.Design and Engineering Application of Prefabricated Structure for Secondary Lining Arch of Double-Track Railway Tunnels Constructed by the Mining Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 204-217
[11] LI Weilin1 ZHANG Guang1 ZHU Yingwei1 HU Shaohua1,2.A 3D Numerical Simulation Study on the Ventilation of T-Shaped Tunnels with Different Bifurcation Angles during Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 158-166
[12] WANG Mingnian1,2 GUO Xiaohan1,2 NI Guangbin3 YU Li1,2 LI Chunhui1,2.A Discussion on the Control Standards for Smoke CO Concentration during Fires in High-altitude Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 40-45
[13] YAO Jie1,2.Analysis on Factors Influencing the Pneumatic Load during Train Operation in High-speed Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 166-171
[14] WANG Mingnian1,2 YANG Henghong1,2 ZHANG Yiteng1,2 LIU Kerui1,2 YU Li1,2.Research and Application of the Safety Coefficient Method for the Middle Rock Pillar of Parallel Tunnels with Small Clear Distance[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 11-19
[15] SUN Shuangchi1,2 SHEN Yi1 ZHOU Zhiyan2 ZHOU Long1 ZHU Hehua1.Analaysis of Deformation and Its Control Measures for Large-diameter Shield Tunnels Passing under Building Complexes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 103-110
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY