[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (2) :20-27    DOI:
专家论坛 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
富水区隧道环向盲管间距优化分析
(1.中南大学土木工程学院,长沙 410075;2.中南大学高速铁路建造技术国家工程试验室, 长沙 410075;3. 广东省南粤交通投资建设有限公司, 广州 510101)
Analysis on Spacing Optimization for Circumferential Blind Drainage Pipes of Tunnels in the Water-rich Area
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075; 2. National Engineering Laboratory of High-speed Railway Construction Technology, Central South University, Changsha 410075; 3. Guangdong Nanyue Transportation Investment and Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510101)
Download: PDF (3978KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 富水区隧道涌水遵循“以堵为主、防排结合”的处置原则,其中排水体系构建的合理性是隧道安全施工与良好运营的关键因素。首先分析隧道排水体系,揭示其工作原理,然后利用FLAC 3D有限差分软件,对鸿图特长隧道富水断层区设置的不同环向盲管间距进行三维流固耦合模拟,通过分析渗水压力、锚杆受力及涌水量,揭示塑性区体积及分布区域特征。研究结果表明:沿隧道轴向,支护结构孔隙水压力大致呈周期性分布,其周期近似等于环向盲管纵向间距;加密环向盲管,在降低支护结构受力并减小塑性区体积的同时,会增加隧道排水量;随环向盲管间距的增大,注浆加固圈塑性区首先出现在围岩好的区域,断层区出现塑性区最晚;断层区锚杆加固效果较差,可通过减小钢拱架环向间距以提高结构刚度,使注浆加固圈沿轴向受力更合理。综合考虑各种因素,建议在建工程断层区环向盲管间距设置为3 m,断层附近区间距为4 m。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
傅鹤林 1
2 安鹏涛 1
2 成国文 3 李 鲒 1
2 余小辉 3 陈 龙 1
2
关键词富水断层   环向盲管   流固耦合   渗流场   塑性区     
Abstract: As for the water inflow in water-rich tunnels, it follows the treatment principle that "priority is given to blocking, and waterproof and drainage are combined". The rationality of drainage system is a key factor of the safe construction and good operation of tunnels. First the tunnel drainage system is analyzed to reveal its working principle, and then the finite difference software FLAC 3D is adopted to carry out the 3D fluid-solid coupling simulation for different spacing conditions of circumferential blind drainage pipes in the water-rich fault zone of Hongtu extralong tunnel, and the seepage pressure, rock bolt stress and water inflow are analyzed to reveal the volume and distribution characteristics of the plastic zone. The study result shows that the pore water pressure on the support structure along the tunnel axis is roughly periodically distributed, with the period approximating to the longitudinal spacing between circumferential blind drainage pipes; increasing the density of circumferential blind drainage pipes, it could reduce the stress on the support structure and the volume of plastic zone and also increase the amount of tunnel drainage; with an increase in the spacing between circumferential blind drainage pipes, the plastic zone of grouting reinforcement ring first appears in the area where the surrounding rock is good and appears in the fault area at the latest; the reinforcement effect of anchor bolts in the fault area is poor, so the circumferential spacing between steel ribs can be reduced to improve the structural rigidity and make the axial stress on the grouting reinforcement ring more reasonable. After due consideration of various factors, it is recommended that regarding the studied tunnel project the spacing between circumferential blind drainage pipes in the fault area should be 3 m and the spacing in the areas near the fault should be 4 m.
KeywordsWater-rich fault,   circumferential blind drainage pipe,   fluid-solid coupling,   Seepage field,   Plastic zone     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(51978668);广东省交通运输厅课题(DFH(201904)YS1-001).
作者简介: 傅鹤林(1965-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学及隧道工程等方面的教学与研究工作,E-mail: fu.h.l@csu.edu.cn. 通讯作者:安鹏涛(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要从事富水区隧道涌水量预测及处治研究,E-mail: apengtao@csu.edu.cn.
引用本文:   
傅鹤林 1, 2 安鹏涛 1, 2 成国文 3 李 鲒 1等 .富水区隧道环向盲管间距优化分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2022,V59(2): 20-27
FU Helin1, 2 AN Pengtao1, 2 CHENG Guowen3 LI Jie1 etc .Analysis on Spacing Optimization for Circumferential Blind Drainage Pipes of Tunnels in the Water-rich Area[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(2): 20-27
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2022/V59/I2/20
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 张付军 1 胡 俊 2,3 段 宇 4 朱才辉 4.某富水断层隧道涌水治理方案优化分析及工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(2): 122-131
[2] 潘旭东 1 白云龙 1 白云飞 2 张志强 2 廖 霖 1.富水地层冻结法施工渗流场对温度场的影响规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(5): 122-128
[3] 惠 强 1 张 军 2 姜海波 1.深埋高地应力水工隧洞节理岩体开挖塑性区特征及分布规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(4): 86-94
[4] 郭咏辉 1 阳军生 2.施工冷缝条件下富水铁路隧道结构裂损模拟分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(1): 141-147
[5] 施玉晶.基于两种拱盖法修建的青岛地区上软下硬岩质地层大跨隧道结构稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(2): 117-126
[6] 陈 曦 1 赵 勇 2 杨玉顺 3.岩体力学参数对隧道围岩稳定性的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 77-84
[7] 陈 鑫 1,2,3 张 泽 1 李东庆 1 周攀峰 4 张 虎 1.无充填裂隙岩体渗流地层冻结温度场演化规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(4): 135-142
[8] 李 明 严松宏 潘春阳 张旭斌.富水大断面黄土隧道开挖流固耦合效应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[9] 黄振恩 吴俊 张洋 刘陕南.考虑流固耦合效应的盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(5): 61-71
[10] 李倩倩 1 尹 凡 2 张顶立 3.复杂位移边界下地层空洞的稳定性分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(4): 87-96
[11] 张金夫 汶文钊.大瑞铁路大柱山隧道高压富水断层处理技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018,55(3): 160-166
[12] 刘 喆 何 平 张安琪 王秀英.土体力学参数随隧道施工动态变化对地层扰动影响的研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017,54(4): 131-136
[13] 屈家旺 1 刘泉声 2 马 昊 2.泥质软岩隧道穿越富水断层带初期支护变形侵限机理及处治对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017,54(3): 181-189
[14] 梁小勇 靳 静 张春会.卵石地层地铁隧道近接施工位移特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017,54(1): 110-115
[15] 符亚鹏 1 方 勇 2 崔 戈 2 郭建宁 2.小规模下伏薄煤层采空区倾角对隧道开挖稳定性的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016,53(4): 70-76
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术