[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (4) :81-88    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
富水大断面黄土隧道开挖流固耦合效应分析
(兰州交通大学,兰州 730070)
Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel
(Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070)
Download: PDF (4167KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 兰州市轨道交通1号线东岗站后配线区间大断面隧道洞身黄土层含水率达到28.5%左右,饱和度达95%以上,施工中会诱发初期支护沉降变形过大、围岩长时间难于稳定等复杂问题。文章根据室内土工试验数据,建立三维有限元模型,基于流固耦合和不耦合效应,分析对比了富水大断面黄土隧道采用CRD法和双侧壁导坑法施工时的初期支护受力和变形特征、地表沉降及孔隙水压力场分布特征。结果表明:在该地层条件下,考虑流固耦合作用较不考虑流固耦合作用,地表沉降、初期支护竖向和水平位移无论是增长速率还是最终值都要大,后期无明显减小,且更接近现场实测值,但两者作用下的初期支护受力变化不大;基于流固耦合效应,采用CRD六部法在地表沉降和隧道变形控制效果方面更加有利,两种工法初期支护受力数值近似,但分布形式不同;流固耦合作用下,地下水水力梯度较大的地方主要位于隧道边墙和仰拱,施工时易发生渗漏,同时应做好拱部喷混凝土密实和回填注浆等,防止渗流场发生转移。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李 明 严松宏 潘春阳 张旭斌
关键词:   
Abstract: The water content of loess layer of the tunnel body with a large section in the rear distribution area of Donggang station of Lanzhou rail transit line 1 is about 28.5% and the saturation is over 95%, which induces large settlement of primary support and long time to get stable for the surrounding rock. Based on the data of laboratory geotechnical test, a three-dimensional finite element model was established, the mechanical and deformation charac?teristics of primary support, ground surface settlement and pore water pressure distribution during construction by CRD method and double side drift method were compared and analyzed based on fluid-solid coupling and uncoupling effects. The results show that the ground surface settlement, vertical and horizontal displacements and their increase rates of primary support considering the effect of fluid-solid coupling are larger than that without considering the effect of fluid-solid coupling, there is no significant decrease in the later period and they are closer to the measured values at site, while there is no big change of mechanical behavior; it is more favorable to adopt the construction method of CRD with six excavation sections to control ground surface settlement and tunnel deformation based on fluid-solid coupling effect and the force applied on primary support are approximate under the two construction methods but the distribution forms is different; under the effect of fluid-solid coupling, the places with large hydraulic gradient of groundwater are mainly located at tunnel sidewall and invert, which is prone to leakage during construction, and compaction of shotcrete at crown and backfill grouting should be carried out to prevent the seepage field from shifting.
KeywordsWater-rich loess,   Large-section tunnel,   Fluid-solid coupling,   CRD method,   Double side drift method,   Numerical analysis     
作者简介: 作者简介:李 明(1984-),男,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程的设计和研究工作,E-mail:80789850@qq.com.
引用本文:   
李 明 严松宏 潘春阳 张旭斌 .富水大断面黄土隧道开挖流固耦合效应分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2019,V56(4): 81-88
LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin .Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(4): 81-88
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2019/V56/I4/81
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 邓铭江 1 谭忠盛 2.超特长隧洞集群TBM试掘进阶段存在的问题与施工技术发展方向[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 1-12
[2] 宋勇军 车永新 任建喜 张 琨.锚固岩石蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 13-18
[3] 严耿升 1,2 何小亮 1,2 韩金明 3 赵 爽 3 赵 成 1,2.盾构隧道工程中砂卵石地层勘察技术分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 19-25
[4] 张 恒 张 港 孙建春 朱亦墨 陈寿根.Q值与围岩力学参数的相关性分析与工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 26-34
[5] 李俊达 1,2 李远富 1,2 李世琦 1,3 刘 凯 1,3 王广开 1,2.基于CBR的山区铁路隧道开挖方法辅助决策模型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 35-41
[6] 王秋懿 1 杨 奎 2 毛金龙 2 杨清源 3 赵伯明 3.九度地震区公路隧道二次衬砌结构抗震综合措施研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 42-49
[7] 赵立财 1,2 余建星 1.长大隧道斜井快速掘进设计方案优化及工期测算[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 50-57
[8] 汪 旭 1 孟 露 1 杨 刚 2 卢 松 1.隧道超前地质预报多源地震干涉法成像结果影响因素研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 58-66
[9] 唐 斌 徐文平.瓦斯隧道施工机械车辆防爆改装形式探讨及建议[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 67-71
[10] 蔡亚宁 张晋勋 武福美.《GB50446-2017盾构法隧道施工与验收规范》中管片部分章节的修订简介[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 72-76
[11] 陈 曦 1 赵 勇 2 杨玉顺 3.岩体力学参数对隧道围岩稳定性的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 77-84
[12] 刘司伟 1 杨红运 1,2 潘瑞凯 1.巷道复合顶板分层厚度反演研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 85-91
[13] 李风云.某地铁车站开挖边坡失稳影响因素上限分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 92-97
[14] 崔光耀 1 王雪来 1 左奎现 1 王明年 2 荆鸿飞 3.强震区高岩温隧道刚柔并济综合减灾技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 98-103
[15] 王 星 1 覃 维 2 马 佳 3 王 蕾 1.公路隧道通风系统局部结构阻力研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 104-113
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术