[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :220-227    DOI:
数值分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
建筑敏感区隧道破除抗滑桩进洞转换体系设计与施工方案优选
(1.广州市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,广州 510060;2.广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院,广州 510006)
Optimization of the Design and Construction Scheme of Tunnel Entry and Conver? sion System for Removal of Anti-slide Pile in Architecturally Sensitive Area
(1. Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006)
Download: PDF (5883KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要  依托攀枝花阳光隧道,进行隧道开挖方案分析,并基于破除抗滑桩过程中围岩-结构受力特征,提出进洞转换体系设计方案。建立隧道开挖全过程精细计算模型,探讨不同工法对应的围岩、隧道及建筑物变形响应特征,综合考虑安全性、经济性、可行性及工期等多项指标进行方案优选研究,并进行现场实测验证。结果表明:在“扶壁式挡墙+抗滑桩”组合结构转换体系作用下围岩-结构位移得到有效控制且能满足整体稳定;预留核心土法施工较CRD法施工产生的力学扰动更明显,最大相差约40%,但两种工法开挖引起的地层、转换结构及建筑物位移均满足要求;隧道破除抗滑桩开挖阶段地层主要发生竖向位移,转换体系在紧贴截桩位置响应最明显,既有建筑向隧道侧发生微倾;原施工方案CRD法力学扰动小,但工程费用高、技术难度大、工序复杂、工期长,综合比选后采用预留核心土法进行施工。现场实测表明,所选方案具有合理性,依托工程取得了较理想的施工效果。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨春山1 杨雪强2 王雅甜2 林永贵1
关键词山岭隧道   破除抗滑桩   方案优选   转换体系设计   力学响应   数值模拟   现场实测     
Abstract: A tunnel excavation scheme analysis is conducted by using the Yangguang Tunnel in Panzhihua, and the conversion system is proposed based on the stressing characteristics of surrounding rock and structure during removal of anti-slide pile. The fine calculation model for tunnel excavation process has been created, the deformation response characteristics of surrounding rock, tunnel and building corresponding to different construction methods have been investigated, the study on scheme optimization has been conducted by taking into account the indicators including safety, economic efficiency, feasibility and duration, and field test and demonstration have been completed.The results indicate: under the effect of the conversion system in "counterfort retaining wall + anti-slide pile" composite structure, the surrounding rock-structure displacement is effectively inhibited and overall stability is maintained; compared with CRD method, reserved core method will generate more obvious mechanical disturbance, with maximally 40% difference between the two, but both construction methods meet the requirements for the displacement of stratum, conversion structure and building; during excavation for removal of anti-slide pile in tunnel, the stratum mainly experiences vertical displacement, the conversion system shows the most obvious response right at the pile cutting position, and the existing building is slightly inclined towards the tunnel side; in the original construction construction method, the CRD method generates less mechanical disturbance, but comes with high engineering cost, high technical difficulty, complex process and long duration. After a comprehensive comparison, the reserved core method is selected. According to field survey, the selected scheme is rational and brings desirable construction results in the project.
KeywordsMountain tunnel removal of anti-slide pile,   Scheme optimization,   Conversion system design,   Mechani? cal response,   Numerical simulation,   Field survey     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(51878192);广东省住房和城乡建设厅科技创新计划项目(2022-K4-094918).
作者简介: 杨春山(1986-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事隧道与地下结构设计研究工作,E-mail:soildoctor@163.com.
引用本文:   
杨春山1 杨雪强2 王雅甜2 林永贵1 .建筑敏感区隧道破除抗滑桩进洞转换体系设计与施工方案优选[J]  现代隧道技术, 2023,V60(6): 220-227
YANG Chunshan1 YANG Xueqiang2 WANG Yatian2 LIN Yonggui1 .Optimization of the Design and Construction Scheme of Tunnel Entry and Conver? sion System for Removal of Anti-slide Pile in Architecturally Sensitive Area[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 220-227
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2023/V60/I6/220
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 薛光桥1,2 肖明清1,2 封 坤3 王少锋1,2 薛皓匀3 郭文琦3.特大直径双层公路盾构隧道管片-内部结构复合体系横向抗震性能研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 67-77
[2] 于建新 刘文金 王金星 刘焕春 周志彬.层状岩体隧道爆破对支护体系的振动影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 99-110
[3] 苗回归1 黄 飞1,2 李树清1,2 罗亚飞1,2 苗德华1 焦杨洋1.基于数值模拟-多元线性回归的大断面隧道平均瓦斯浓度检测位置研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 128-135
[4] 马亚丽娜1, 2 陈雅琪1, 2 刘继国1, 2 崔 臻3 周光新4.跨走滑断层铰接式隧洞衬砌错断破坏机制研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 136-147
[5] 陈 龙 封 坤 吴柏翰 郭付康 王 维.大埋深盾构隧道结构受力现场实测分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 148-157
[6] 周 舟1 钟长平2 谢文达1.泥岩地层盾构常压开舱对既有隧道结构变形的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 205-212
[7] 胡威东1,2.超大直径泥水盾构隧道施工通风设计方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 186-194
[8] 郭英杰1,2 丁文其1,2 李晓冉1,2 马 畅1,2 张清照1,2.新型不锈钢波纹板抗弯力学特性试验与数值分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 262-268
[9] 罗 勋 1, 2, 3 王明年 1, 2 于 丽 1, 2 张 霄 1, 2 杨恒洪 1, 2 唐浪洲 1, 2.斜滑断层不均匀错动下隧道三维力学响应计算模型[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 86-94
[10] 赵大能 1 王 毅 2 任志华 3.考虑断层错动-地震动共同作用的隧道结构力学响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 95-105
[11] 王立川 1,2 付柏毅 2 章慧健 2 冀国栋 1 耿 麒 3 王铮铮 4 王灿林 5 王 锋 6.TBM滚刀切削花岗岩和灰岩的力学响应差异[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 81-89
[12] 叶连超 1 何江陵 2 李 科 3 邱志雄 2 江星宏 3.基于三角模糊数与GWO-ELM模型的公路隧道改扩建方案优选研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 55-64
[13] 胡振宇 1 封 坤 1 郭文琦 1 彭长胜 2 李姣阳 2.内部结构不同施作时机对特大断面盾构隧道管片衬砌受力的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 90-101
[14] 张学军 1 聂启强 2 龚元江 3.滇中红层隧洞软岩大变形规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 156-163
[15] 刘禹阳 1 席龙龙 1 来弘鹏 2 赵永宾 3 孙卫星 3 贾 能 1.富钙围岩隧道排水系统结晶物与水环境时空变化规律及结晶路径分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 217-226
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术