[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (1) :183-194    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
双线不同盾构机掘进地表变形及施工参数影响分析
(1.浙大城市学院土木工程系,杭州 310015;2.绍兴文理学院土木工程学院,绍兴 312000;3.澳门大学土木与环境工程系,澳门 999078;4.宏润建设集团股份有限公司,上海 202035)
Analysis on Ground Surface Deformation and Influence of Construction Parameters Caused by Two Different Shield Machines in Double-tube Tunnelling
(1. Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000; 3. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau, Macau 999078; 4. Hongrun Construction Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 202035)
Download: PDF (4362KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 文章依托杭州地铁2号线某盾构区间段工程,对软土区双线采用不同盾构机施工引起的地表变形进行了现场实测,得到了双线盾构掘进引起的地表变形规律,并验证了修正的双线Peck公式的适用性。结果表明:软土区先、后行线盾构掘进参数不同,其影响大小也不尽相同,地表变形量在盾构机通过前后急剧变化,由于注浆的影响,在盾尾通过时会有回弹现象发生;软土区盾构刀盘扭矩可由5个计算因子组成,计算结果与实测值吻合度较高;盾构刀盘开口率越大,其平均扭矩值越大,土体损失率大的占比也就越高,引起的地表最大沉降量也越大;以刀盘扭矩T和单环排土量Q的比值作为控制参数,分析得到了其与地表沉降值存在一定的正相关关系,且刀盘开口率越小,拟合得到的结果就越精确。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
丁 智 1
2 冯丛烈 1
2 仇 硕 1 陆 钊 3 范俊聪 4
关键词铁路隧道   地表变形   现场试验   双线盾构   软土地区   土体损失率   刀盘扭矩     
Abstract: Based on a shield-driven running tunnel project of Hangzhou Metro Line 2, this paper carries out field measuring of the ground surface deformation caused by two different shield machines in double-tube tunnelling in soft soil areas, obtains the laws of the surface deformation caused by shield-driven double-tube tunnelling and verifies the applicability of the modified Peck formula to double-tube tunnelling. The results show that in soft soil areas the impacts on ground surface deformation caused by different shield construction parameters in the previously and subsequently excavated tunnels are different, while the surface deformation changes sharply before and after the shield machine passing through the cutting face, and a rebound phenomenon occurs when the shield tail passes through the cutting face due to the influence of the grouting; The cutterhead torque of the shield machine in soft soil areas can be composed of five calculation factors, and the calculation results are in good agreement with the measured values. The larger the opening rate of the shield cutterhead is, the larger the average torque value will be, the higher the percentage of large ground loss rate will be, and the larger the maximum ground surface settlement will be; The ratio of cutterhead torque T to mucking volume per ring Q is used as the control parameter for analyzing the ground surface settlement, and a certain positive correlation between the ratio and the surface settlement value is determined, the smaller the cutterhead opening rate is, the more accurate the fitting results will be.
KeywordsRailway tunnel,   Ground surface deformation,   Field test,   Double-tube shield-driven tunnel,   Soft soil ar? ea,   Ground loss rate,   Cutterhead torque     
基金资助:浙江省自然科学基金(LHZ20E080001);浙江省重点研发计划项目(2017C03020,2020C01102);杭州市科技计划项目(20191203B44)
作者简介: 丁 智(1983-),男,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事轨道交通施工及运营对周边环境影响研究工作,E-mail: dingz@zucc.edu.cn
引用本文:   
丁 智 1, 2 冯丛烈 1, 2 仇 硕 1 陆 钊 3 范俊聪 4 .双线不同盾构机掘进地表变形及施工参数影响分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2022,V59(1): 183-194
DING Zhi1, 2 FENG Conglie1, 2 QIU Shuo1 LU Zhao3 FAN Juncong4 .Analysis on Ground Surface Deformation and Influence of Construction Parameters Caused by Two Different Shield Machines in Double-tube Tunnelling[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(1): 183-194
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2022/V59/I1/183
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 葛正辉1 郑建国1 李新志2 陈 鹏3 宁志玮2 王鹏程2.不同形式拱架初期支护变形规律实测与数值研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[2] 张 欢1,2 张世殊3 李天斌1,2 杨 罡1,2 李世森1,2 肖华波3 陈卫东3.基于GAPSO-LightGBM的TBM施工隧道围岩等级智能预测方法[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 98-109
[3] 匡 亮1 粟 威1 陶伟明1 田四明2 申玉生3 黎 旭2 汪辉武1.跨走滑断层隧道结构影响分区及设防范围研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(6): 45-54
[4] 冯 通1 胡锦健2 李 研1 张 箭2 梁 禹3, 4 丰土根2.基于TCN-LSTM的盾构刀盘扭矩实时预测研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 120-128
[5] 魏荣华1,2 张康健1,2 张志强1,2.铁路隧道深埋水沟防排水技术参数优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 183-192
[6] 宋越鹏1 范晓锋2 梁 禹2,3,4 彭红国5 张晗炜5.城际铁路隧道深大圆形竖井开挖阶段变形监测分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 219-226
[7] 周晓军.基于横断面几何参数的高速铁路隧道预制拼装二次衬砌分块设计方法[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(4): 232-243
[8] 高树全1,2,3 蒋良文1,2,3 牟元存1,2,3 李 星1,2,3 王树栋1,2.西南复杂艰险山区铁路隧道超前地质预报技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(2): 52-59
[9] 王明年1,2 邓 涛3 于 丽1,2.中国交通隧道运营及防灾通风技术发展与展望[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(2): 152-166
[10] 马华兵1 冯良平2 王恒栋3 霰建平4 商冬凡5 崔光耀6.长节段大吨位预制拼装综合管廊接头防水现场试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(1): 208-215
[11] 曾弘锐1,2 孙文昊3 何 卫3 郭亚林1,2 郭 春1,2.基于机器学习的铁路隧道施工碳排放预测模型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 29-39
[12] 朱星宇 刘 征 张志强 冯 应.铁路隧道结构设计参数对二次衬砌裂缝影响规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 1-10
[13] 陈 伟1,2 张明红2 张 莹2 林 玲2.中老铁路某隧道盐岩工程地质特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 234-242
[14] 范文昊 1,2 谢盛昊 1,2 周飞聪 1,2 王志杰 1,2 张 凯 3 骆云建 3.新建双线盾构隧道下穿既有隧道近接影响分区及控制措施案例研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 43-57
[15] 朵生君.铁路隧道TBM长距离施工通风技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 222-228
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术