[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :96-107    DOI:
数值分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
软岩大变形隧道支护拆换力学与时空变形行为研究
(1.西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031;2.四川绵九高速公路有限责任公司,成都 610041;3.四川高速公路建设开发集团有限公司,成都 610047)
Study on Mechanical Behavior and Spatio-Temporal Deformation during Support Replacement in Soft Rock Large Deformation Tunnels
(1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2. Sichuan Mianjiu Expressway Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041; 3. Sichuan Expressway Construction and Development Group Co., Ltd.,Chengdu 610047)
Download: PDF (9429KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 针对九绵高速软岩大变形隧道非仰拱部分支护失效所面临的拆换问题,结合现场监测与数值模拟方法,探究支护拆换时的力学行为与时空变形规律及其作用机制。结果表明:(1)研究条件下,靠近非拆换段的新支护受力小,远离非拆换段的新支护受力大;离非拆换段距离相同的新支护,先拆换的受力大,后拆换的受力小。(2)支护拆换工作面位置对新作初期支护受力的影响大于对新作二次衬砌的影响,新作初期支护-二次衬砌应力分担比例与拆换引起的围岩松弛应力呈正相关,改善围岩物理力学参数后进行支护拆换是解决软岩大变形的有效措施。(3)距离非拆换段前后1D(D为隧道等效直径)范围内结构的位移受支护拆换影响小,拆换段中间部分的位移基本相同且比两端大。(4)对于软岩等岩性较差的隧道,拆换时应至少在拆换位置前后1D范围内施加必要的临时保护;拆换前的注浆能起到施工预加固的作用,通过“坏-注-换-抗”的过程,能有效抑制软岩流变效应。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
浣宇翔1 田礼勇2 杨文波1 李昊豫1 刘 勇3 唐 浩3 姚超凡1
关键词软岩大变形   支护拆换   现场监测   力学行为   时空变形     
Abstract: In view of the support replacement problem induced by support failure (exclusive of invert arch) in the soft rock large deformation tunnel on Jiuzhaigou-Mianyang Expressway, this study explores the mechanical behavior and spatio-temporal deformation characteristics during support replacement through field monitoring and numerical simulation methods. The results show that: (1) Under the research conditions, the new support near the non-replacement section bears less load, while the new support further away the non-replacement section bears more load.Among the new supports at the same distance from the non-replacement section, the one replaced earlier bears more load, and the one replaced later bears less load. (2) The position of the support replacement working face has a greater impact on the load of the new initial support than on the secondary lining, and the proportion of stress sharing between the new initial support and the secondary lining is positively correlated with the relaxation stress caused by the replacement. Conducting support replacement after improving the physical and mechanical parameters of surrounding rocks is an effective measure to solve the large deformation problem in soft rocks. (3) The displacement of the structure within 1D (D is the equivalent diameter of the tunnel) in front of and behind the non-replacement section is less affected by the support replacement, and the displacement in the middle part of the replacement section is basically the same and larger than that at both ends. (4) For tunnels with poor rock types such as soft rocks, necessary temporary protection should be applied within a range of at least 1D in front of and behind the replacement position. Grouting before replacement can play a role in pre-reinforcement, and the process of "failure-grouting-replacement-resistance" can effectively suppress the rheological effect of soft rocks.
KeywordsSoft rock large deformation,   Support replacement,   Field monitoring,   Mechanical behavior,   Spatio-tempo? ral deformation     
作者简介: 浣宇翔(1999-),男,硕士,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作,E-mail:240207620@qq.com. 通讯作者:杨文波(1985-),男,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学和研究工作,E-mail:yangwenbo1179@hotmail.com.
引用本文:   
浣宇翔1 田礼勇2 杨文波1 李昊豫1 刘 勇3 唐 浩3 姚超凡1 .软岩大变形隧道支护拆换力学与时空变形行为研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(3): 96-107
HUAN Yuxiang1 TIAN Liyong2 YANG Wenbo1 LI Haoyu1 LIU Yong3 TANG Hao3 YAO Chaofan1 .Study on Mechanical Behavior and Spatio-Temporal Deformation during Support Replacement in Soft Rock Large Deformation Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 96-107
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I3/96
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 杨绍玉1 王啸天2 张培元1 刘胜臣1 李树忱2 李洛宁2.钻爆法隧道喷膜防水技术研究综述[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 1-14
[2] 王立川1,2 闫广天1 袁 玮3 高红兵4 李利平2 张春瑜1,5 吴 剑4 张 龙3.TBM搭载式全角法向深锚孔钻机研制与应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 67-74
[3] 陈 相1,2 林 志1,2 冯万林1,2 杨红运1,2.公路隧道素混凝土衬砌裂缝扩展特征及力学行为试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 212-220
[4] 张昕阳1,2 申玉生1,2 常铭宇1,2 刘 童1,2 孙天赦3,4 胡 帅3,4.克泥效工法对泥岩地层盾构隧道地表变形控制规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 283-290
[5] 陈 旺1 彭焱锋1 刘维正2 张思宇2 陈常辉1.三孔顶管上穿施工对既有隧道与地表变形影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(1): 170-182
[6] 薛青松.大断面矩形顶管上跨地铁隧道施工变形分布特征及控制措施[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(6): 148-161
[7] 王圣涛1 张俊儒2 彭 波1 燕 波3.拱隧一体结构跨越巨型溶洞段处治技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 263-273
[8] 周 嵩1 潘 岳1,2 刘永胜1,2 谢 韬1,2 张理蒙1 张继超1.极高地应力破碎地层斜井进正洞力学行为分析及施工优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(4): 142-150
[9] 朱建林1 王立川2,3 刘志强1 马利遥2,3 李庆斌2.考虑流变效应的软岩大变形隧道多层支护作用机理分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 18-24
[10] 陈志敏1 王 洪1 龚 军2 李增印2 彭 易1.高地应力软岩隧道双层初期支护围岩变形特征[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 85-95
[11] 杨赵峰1 汪 波2 杜永全1 黄长宽1 樊 勇1.主动支护技术在海东隧洞软岩大变形中的应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 245-252
[12] 陈一凡1 黄书华2 沈 翔1, 3, 4 盛 健2 陈湘生1, 3, 4, 张 良2.密集城区超大直径盾构切削群桩对上部建筑物振动影响规律分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 266-275
[13] 魏传文1 王相龙1 杨旭旭2 赵玉棣1 邵 行3 满新杰1张长安3 周洋洋1 张作顺2.薄层状岩体隧道冒顶机制及支护方案优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(1): 252-259
[14] 田宝华 1 赵永明 1 吴行州 1 张 彪 1,2 高 嵩 1.杉阳隧道软岩大变形控制方法及结构力学特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 242-251
[15] 燕 波 1 张俊儒 2 张新锦 1 彭 磊 1 宁 波 1.基于围岩径向位移释放率的超大断面隧道下穿施工围岩稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(2): 115-124
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术