[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :25-34    DOI:
研究与探讨 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
高地应力软岩隧道快速施工围岩稳定性分析
(1.中铁十二局集团有限公司,太原 030024;2.西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031)
Stability Analysis of Surrounding Rock in High-geostress Soft Rock Tunnels under Rapid Construction
(1. China Railway 12th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030024; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering,Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (6152KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 研究长进尺快速施工下高地应力软岩隧道围岩的稳定性对保障施工安全、提升施工效率意义重大。首先以掌子面滑移失稳模式讨论围岩失稳问题,采用极限分析上限法,利用耗散功率与外力功率间的关系分析不同地质环境、开挖参数对围岩稳定性的影响;而后,以软弱围岩松散破碎失稳模式讨论围岩失稳问题,采用围岩整体安全系数法揭示高地应力软岩隧道围岩的稳定性演变机理;最后总结提炼出复合两种失稳模式的高地应力软岩隧道围岩稳定性判定基准。研究表明:极限分析上限法不仅可用于评价掌子面稳定性,还可用于求解推断掌子面的失稳形迹;岩体黏聚力与内摩擦角对稳定性具有重要影响,但随着二者的增大掌子面稳定系数并非线性增加,增长速率逐渐放缓;掌子面安全系数随开挖进尺、台阶高度增加呈非线性变化,可根据变化曲率确定最优开挖参数;提出高地应力软岩隧道快速施工下围岩稳定性评价方法,即逐次判定隧道是否发生静态滑移失稳和动态松散破碎失稳。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
包烨明1 陈子全2 周子寒2 汪 波2
关键词高地应力   软岩隧道   快速施工   稳定性分析     
Abstract: Studying the stability of surrounding rock in high-geostress soft rock tunnels under rapid construction with long excavation round length is of great significance for ensuring construction safety and improving construction efficiency.Firstly, the sliding instability mode of the working face is discussed to analyze the instability problem of the surrounding rock using the upper bound limit analysis method. The relationship between dissipated power and external force power is used to analyze the influence of different geological environments and excavation parameters on the stability of the surrounding rock. Secondly, the instability of the surrounding rock is disscussed using the loosening and fractured instability mode of weak surrounding rock, the evolution mechanism of the stability of surrounding rock in high-geostress soft rock tunnels is revealed using the overall safety factor method for surrounding rock. Finally,a comprehensive criterion for determining the stability of surrounding rock in high-geostress soft rock tunnels,which combines these two instability modes, is summarized and refined.The research shows that the upper bound limit analysis method can not only be used to evaluate the stability of the working face but also to infer the instability trajectory of the working face. The cohesion and internal friction angle of the rock mass have a significant influence on stability, but as they increase, the stability coefficient of the sidewall does not increase linearly, and the growth rate gradually slows down. The safety factor of the working face varies nonlinearly with the excavation round length and bench height, and the optimal excavation parameters can be determined based on the change in curvature. A method for evaluating the stability of surrounding rock in high-geostress soft rock tunnels under rapid construction is proposed, which sequentially determines whether the tunnel undergoes static sliding instability and dynamic loosening and fractured instability.
KeywordsHigh geostress,   Soft rock tunnel,   Rapid construction,   Stability analysis     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(52008351);四川省交通运输科技项目(2021-B-01).
作者简介: 包烨明(1980-),男,高级工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究,E-mail: paper19108201794@163.com.
引用本文:   
包烨明1 陈子全2 周子寒2 汪 波2 .高地应力软岩隧道快速施工围岩稳定性分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(3): 25-34
BAO Yeming1 CHEN Ziquan2 ZHOU Zihan2 WANG Bo2 .Stability Analysis of Surrounding Rock in High-geostress Soft Rock Tunnels under Rapid Construction[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 25-34
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I3/25
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 陈志敏1 王 洪1 龚 军2 李增印2 彭 易1.高地应力软岩隧道双层初期支护围岩变形特征[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 85-95
[2] 疏梓宸1 刘 阳 1,2 张建经3 马旭超4 杨辉宗1.深埋软岩隧道围岩力学响应及支护受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 184-
[3] 王 锋.基于SSA-LSTM模型的软岩隧道变形特征智能预测及应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(1): 56-66
[4] 侯守江.基于多元算法融合的软岩隧道围岩变形预测模型及应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(6): 151-164
[5] 王 冠.严重挤压性围岩隧道平行导洞双层支护作用机理研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 138-146
[6] 陈锡武 1 卿伟宸 1 刘国强 2.高地应力断层带超大断面隧道施工设计[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 204-212
[7] 陶玉敬 1 袁传保 1 王茂靖 1 宋 章 1 刘国强 2.成兰铁路跃龙门隧道深埋越岭段大变形原因分析研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(4): 229-236
[8] 刘国强.跃龙门隧道软岩大变形两台阶快速成环法施工技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(3): 252-258
[9] 蒲 松 1 向 龙 2 廖 杭 1 余 涛 1 姚志刚 1 方 勇 1 朱牧原 1.极高地应力层状围岩隧道偏压演化规律及围岩控制[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(1): 90-99
[10] 姚志雄 1,2,3 刘梦飞 1 吴 波 4 刘耀星 1 陈希茂 5 郑国文 5 罗芷祎 1.基于承载特性的群洞稳定性及初期支护优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(1): 119-129
[11] 王子健 1 刘 腾 2 冀晓东 1 刘学彦 1.斜坡条件下盾构隧道开挖面稳定极限上限研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(6): 42-50
[12] 王亚琼 1, 2 杨 强 1, 2 潘红伟 3 高启栋 1, 2 张士朝 1, 2 王志丰 1, 2.基于3DEC模拟的高地应力水平层状隧道围岩变形破坏特征分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 127-136
[13] 马 栋 晋刘杰 王武现 黄立新.基于数值模拟与实测数据拟合的高地应力软岩隧道二次衬砌施作时机探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 137-146
[14] 刘志良 1 林后来 1 李 亮 1 李东贤 1 高 原 2 徐 亮 1 胡 俊 3.基于多重响应面法和蒙特卡罗法的隧道系统可靠度分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(3): 78-87
[15] 崔光耀 1 魏杭杭 1 王明胜 2.高地应力强风化炭质板岩隧道大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(3): 183-189
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术