[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (4) :187-195    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
侧向荷载作用下损伤隧道粘钢加固效果试验研究
 
(1.同济大学土木工程学院,上海 200092;2.上海同岩土木工程科技股份有限公司,上海 200092;3.上海地下基础设施安全检测与养护装备工程技术研究中心,上海 200092;4.上海同济工程咨询有限公司,上海 200092;5.贵州高速公路集团有限公司,贵阳 550001;6.浙江省交通规划设计研究院有限公司,杭州 310030)
Test Study on the Reinforcement Effect of Bonding Steel to Damaged Tunnels under the Lateral Loads
 
(1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092; 2. Shanghai Tongyan Civil Engineering Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092; 3. Shanghai Research Center for Underground Infrastructure Safety Inspection and Maintenance Equipment Engineering Technology, Shanghai 200092; 4. Shanghai Tongji Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092;5. Guizhou Expressway Group Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550001; 6. Zhejiang Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd,Hangzhou 310030)
Download: PDF (4116KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
文章导读  
摘要 为了研究侧向荷载作用下损伤隧道衬砌粘钢加固效果,采用1∶10的模型试验,研究了侧向荷载作用下隧道衬砌结构和不同损伤状态粘钢加固结构的变形、破坏模式。试验结果表明:侧向荷载作用下,隧道衬砌结构破坏模式为脆性破坏,破坏发展过程为拱腰开裂—拱肩脆性剪坏—拱腰延性受弯破坏;衬砌结构拱顶和左右侧边墙—拱腰处裂损集中发育,截面刚度快速衰减,是结构的脆弱点和危险点;粘钢加固后,结构拱腰处结合面剪应力引起的粘钢剥离是加固结构失稳的主要因素;结构剩余承载力占比为30%时粘钢加固结构承载力未提高,在剩余承载力占比为48%时粘钢加固结构承载力提升4.1%,在剩余承载力占比为60%时加固结构承载力提升10.2%。因此,侧向压力作用下隧道损伤衬砌采用粘钢加固后结构的承载力提升皆不明显,加固效果有限,侧向荷载引起的衬砌损伤不宜采用粘钢加固。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘学增 1 谷文川 1 杨芝璐 2
3 郭乔堃 4 何国华 5 冯 劲 6
关键词公路隧道   损伤衬砌   粘钢加固   模型试验   侧向荷载   加固时机   加固效果     
Abstract: To research the reinforcement effect of bonding steel to the damaged linings of tunnels under lateral loads, a 1∶10 model test was conducted, and the modes of deformation and damage of the tunnel lining structure under lateral loads and the steel-bonded structure in different states of damage were researched. The test results showed that under lateral loads, the damage mode of the tunnel lining structure was brittle failure, and the damage development process was as follows: arch waist cracking — brittle shear failure of arch shoulder — damage to arch waist ductility and bending; damage was concentrated on the crown of the lining structure and the side wall-waist on the left and right sides, and the section stiffness was rapidly attenuated, which was the vulnerability and dangerous point of the structure; after steel was bonded for reinforcement, the stripping of bonded steel caused by the shear stress of the bonding surface at the structure waist was the major factor causing the instability of the reinforced structure; when the remaining bearing capacity proprtion was 30%, the bearing capacity of the structure reinforced by bonded steel was not increased; when the remaining bearing capacity proprtion was 48%, the bearing capacity of the reinforced structure was increased by 4.1%; when the remaining bearing capacity proprtion was 60%, the bearing capacity of the reinforced structure was increased by 10.2%. Consequently, after the damaged tunnel lining was rein? forced with bonded steel under the lateral pressure, the bearing capacity was not significantly improved and the reinforcement effect was limited, and the lining damage caused by lateral loads should not be reinforced by bonding steel.
KeywordsHighway tunnel,   Damaged lining,   Bonding steel for reinforcement,   Model test,   Lateral load,   Time of rein? forcement,   Reinforcement effect     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(51878497);贵州省科学技术厅重大科技专项(黔科合重大专项字[2018]3011);浙江省交通运输厅 科技项目(2018011).
作者简介: 刘学增(1971-),男,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事隧道建设安全风险评估、新型监测检测技术、结构健康诊断及加固设计理论等关 键技术研究工作,E-mail: xuezengL@263.net.
引用本文:   
刘学增 1 谷文川 1 杨芝璐 2, 3 郭乔堃 4 何国华 5 冯 劲 6 .侧向荷载作用下损伤隧道粘钢加固效果试验研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2022,V59(4): 187-195
LIU Xuezeng1 GU Wenchuan1 YANG Zhilu2, 3 GUO Qiaokun4 HE Guohua5 FENG Jin6 .Test Study on the Reinforcement Effect of Bonding Steel to Damaged Tunnels under the Lateral Loads[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(4): 187-195
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2022/V59/I4/187
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 徐 湃 1,2 朱代强 1,2 蒋树屏 1,2 邢荣军 1,2 李亮亮 1,2.重庆长大公路隧道结构安全保障技术及策略研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 18-28
[2] 于建游 1 姜逸帆 2 林 铭 2 刘建其 1 蔡李斌 2 蒋新政 2 王志杰 2 周 平 2.考虑渗流与裂隙作用的寒区隧道保温层厚度计算方法[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 108-117
[3] 叶 飞 1 张兴冰 1 苏恩杰 1 温小宝 1 夏天晗 1 魏艳春 2.基于驾驶舒适性的公路隧道侧壁装饰研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 196-203
[4] 刘洪亮 1 章邦超 2 郭 佳 2 焦叶飞 2 张 敏 2.土压盾构穿越上软下硬地层洞内超前注浆加固技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(4): 240-247
[5] 梁荣柱 1,2 韦 实 1 王新新 3 孙廉威 3 吴小建 3.内支撑式和悬臂式锁口钢管桩基坑围护结构变形对比试验分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(3): 172-182
[6] 黄世光 1 杨艳娜 2 范全忠 2 黄靖宇 2 余 磊 2.隧道堵水限排设计参数变化规律试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(3): 201-210
[7] 张付军 1 胡 俊 2,3 段 宇 4 朱才辉 4.某富水断层隧道涌水治理方案优化分析及工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(2): 122-131
[8] 赵 威 1,2 张 科 1,2 郭 春 1,2.特长高速公路隧道通风斜井钢波纹板式中隔墙技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(2): 132-140
[9] 程咏春 1 曾祥纪 1 王振佳 1 王 栋 1 杨 蕴 2 吴咏敬 3 董 平 3, 4.岩溶隧道排水管结晶堵塞试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(2): 159-166
[10] 包逸帆 1,2 王明年 1,2 秦鹏程 1,2 陈湛文 1,2 韩常领 3 严 涛 1,2 陈劲宇 1,4.遮阳棚对隧道进出口明暗适应的影响规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 111-117
[11] 王 飞.深厚砂卵石地层超深竖井施工降水模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 176-182
[12] 陈志敏 1,2 李江鹏 1 薛智文 3.极高地应力软岩隧道丢失变形与控制模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 164-175
[13] 崔光耀 1 蒋梦新 1 王明胜 2.高烈度地震区隧道洞口段纤维混凝土衬砌抗震效果分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(1): 207-213
[14] 吴铭芳 春军伟.富水软岩隧道仰拱病害的综合处治与设计反思[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(6): 233-243
[15] 卢冠楠 1 王 鹏 1 杨 蕴 2 毛成君 3 吴咏敬 4 吴剑锋 3 董 平 3, 4 吴吉春 3.岩溶区隧道排水系统地下水渗流结晶堵塞机理及阻垢技术研究综述[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021,58(6): 11-20
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术